Some thoughts about the Chimpictures we all have fun with ......
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 02:52 PM
Original message |
Some thoughts about the Chimpictures we all have fun with ...... |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 02:57 PM by Husb2Sparkly
Has any previous president ever had so many truly bad pictures of them published? It seems there's not a day goes by that a new one doesn't surface. That prom dress thing in West Virginia on the 4th. The famous one of him juggling Barney while saluting. The horribly unflattering one of Laura getting onto Marine One (the helicopter).
I suspect a part of this is the ability to take pictures as fast as a machine gun. Anyone who is photographed that way will inevitably have some shots that are awful.
But the bad ones of idiot son just keep on coming.
Why? How? Who?
There's no doubt the WH knows this happens.
<Bad pictures? How about my bad slepping? :) >
|
ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 02:53 PM by ck4829
You are right, I never have seen so many bad photos of a bad President before.
|
cry baby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. cause he's just plain U.G.L.Y. |
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Are you talking about him standing on a podium and the bunting looks like a dress? I thought that was a PShop! No???
If that's the case and seeing Laura's butt, finally the photographers must be hating them too.
As much as I hate to say it, Bush is really not an ugly person if you didn't know his deeds.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
plus a non-photogenic president.
Clinton's bad photos just looked puffy. Bill was a fairly photogenic guy.
I bet bush sr took some really bad ones, though. yikes.
|
tenshi816
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-11-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I wonder if it's because |
|
the publications that publish them aren't allowed (by their Republican-loving owners/shareholders) to say anything bad about the Dumbass, so they get around it by using the silliest, most unflattering photographs they can come up with.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.