Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sludge: NYT Plans FRONT PAGE Splash On Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:48 PM
Original message
Sludge: NYT Plans FRONT PAGE Splash On Rove
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3kr.htm

NY TIMES FIGHTS BACK: PLANS FRONT SPLASH ON ROVE; REPORTER SITS IN JAIL

Top editors of the NY TIMES made the decision Monday afternoon to turn up the heat on White House adviser Karl Rove.

The TIMES is planning to lead Tuesday editions with growing calls for Rove's resignation, newsroom sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT, a powerplay in DC all-star game of high stakes finger pointing and intrigue.

While TIMES reporter Judith Miller remains jailed for refusing to testy about sourcing before a grand jury investigating the outing of a CIA "operative," the paper's editors are splashing Rove's own lack of detailed explanation detailing his press contacts.

"Scott McClellan, Bush's spokesman, repeatedly declined to say whether he stood behind his previous assertions that Rove played no role in the matter or whether the president would follow through on his pledge to fire anyone in his administration found to be involved," report the NYT's David Johnston, Adam Liptak and Richard Stevenson in their front page lead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. "While TIMES reporter Judith Miller remains jailed"
How sweet the sound.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. i swear Rove better be guilty or else things are going to suck even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That is an EXCELLENT point, but we've got him in spirit, if not
technically.

Don't worry. There won't be a backlash, here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. lil' Scotty and the amazing technicolor ongoing criminal investigation
of doom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, don't knock the help!
You may want Judy in jail, and that's where she is. If the NYT is going to put the heat on the WH, why are you complaining?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. "turn up the heat on the WH and rover"
I like the sound of that. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Classic Sludge.
Whenever they know they can't spin it out of existence, they gove it to Marvelous Matt to splash around & pretend he got a scoop, thereby hoping to cling to some shred of a pretense of redeeming journalistic value.

So, yeah. It's coming out. They can't stop it. Matt gets to play reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. PUT JUDY IN THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM!
Make her turn states evidence and give her a new identity after.

How could it not be that important? They've done it to other people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shit, this is Fan. Fan, this is Shit.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. WHOOHOO!! We got 'em stepping on each other's toes!!
NOW the cards come crashing down. THIS is what is necessary.

Let's hope NEITHER SIDE folds anytime soon. Let them beat on each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why does the NY Times put up with their people leaking
information to Matt Drudge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like its a keeper issue
might buy a couple of issues for prosperity.

"Whats this Grandpap?"
"Why son, this was right when we started to get our country back......"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainman99 Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. FINALLY!!!! This is GREAT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. FRONT PAGE ALREADY ON WEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Rove Comes Under New Scrutiny in C.I.A. Disclosure Case
Rove Comes Under New Scrutiny in C.I.A. Disclosure Case

By DAVID STOUT
Published: July 11, 2005

WASHINGTON, July 11 - The White House went on the defensive today amid a barrage of questions from Democrats and reporters about the presidential adviser Karl Rove and whether he had disclosed the name of a covert intelligence operative in retaliation for criticism of the administration's Iraq policy.

President Bush's chief spokesman, Scott McClellan, declined to repeat his earlier assertions that Mr. Rove, the deputy White House chief of staff, had nothing to do with leaking the name of the operative, Valerie Plame of the Central Intelligence Agency, to get back at her husband, a former United States ambassador who had publicly challenged Bush administration policy.

Nor would Mr. McClellan repeat his earlier statements that any White House staff person who had leaked the name should be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Well, that's pretty good.
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 08:03 PM by BullGooseLoony
Not a SHOCKER, but they sure gave a lot of print to the Dems.

You know, what this actually looks like from Drudge is damage control spin- as if the NYT "has it in" for BushCo, and this is the "worst" of it...when really they're just reporting it straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It might be bigger on the actual printed page tomorrow
Let's hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You see what I'm saying about what Drudge is doing, though? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yup...I didn't go to Sludge though because I can't stand to stand in
crap. I did see the NYTime's headline on their page though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I don't think this is the piece Drudge is referencing
this was written mid-afternoon, he seems to be talking about tomorrow's editions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THX1138 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Is this the right one?
Not sure that this is the article dredge is referencing. He claims the story will be written by "David Johnston, Adam Liptak and Richard Stevenson ". This article is written by Davis Stout. I believe the NYT posts tomorrows edition at midnight ET

Happy to see this on their front page now but hoping the one tomorrow is a bit meatier. I love the smell of pork fat in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I think you're right
I think it's tomorrow's piece that's the sledgehammer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Resignation isn't good enough for Rove
or his accomplices. let's NOT forget *them*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainman99 Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. This is too much fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
18.  Judith Miller must have more to hide than just who leaked
the CIA's top secret personnel. We now know Rove is guilty. She has
become part of the cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randomelement Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Judith Miller deserves the jail time, but I think she's too scared to blab

My guess is that she knows who the other "senior administration official" is (recall there is another besides Rove) and is worried about any "repercussions". She did mention something about the government being "too powerful" in her statement. Put her (and her family) into Witness protection and we'd probably end up with a much bigger fish to fry -

my two cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Why would she be scared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. CIA "operative". Why the quotes?
Oh....I get it....sort of like....... "Drudge is a 'journalist'"....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. Here are the links:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC