Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woodward sucking up to the admin once again (RE Plame)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:35 PM
Original message
Woodward sucking up to the admin once again (RE Plame)
Disgusting. What's wrong with this guy?

There's nothing wrong with what Rove did. Rove was unlikely to have leaked the source...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that just like when people said Nixon was "unlikely" to have been
involved with Watergate, huh Woodward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Here is a great Article that exposes Woodward and the Washington Post
for the Bush loving enabling assholes they are:

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Media/020504Hasty/020504hasty.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for the link...I'm gonna read it in a bit
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Idiot Woodward relies on the same "inside sources" as Novak.
Doesn't he realize his "inside sources" are all trying to avoid condemnation for dirtbag story planting in Woodward and others, if not indictment ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's wrong with him? He's a Republican. Always has been.
Bernstein's a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. getting a "ruh-porter's perspective from Woodward is like
getting landscaping advice from a baseball player because he mowed lawns when he was a kid..


Woodward had ONE big story, and he stole the thunder from Bernstein. He's been riding taht wave for decades..Two words for him... HAS BEEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. pronounciation was driving me cah-razy"-love the
pic in your sig, he's so swirly & everytime I see it I hear theme from "Oklahoma" :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I keep hearing....
"I feeeeeel pretttty and wittttty and....." West Side Story??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Source on this?
Just out of curiousity.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Sorry about that
He was on Larry King. They should probably play the interview again at 12 EST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have a theory about this
Get out the tinfoil...BUT I think Woodward was used by the bush contigent (Oliver Stone's *oil guys*) to take down Nixon in Watergate because they were afraid he would crack about the Kennedy assassination.

Hey, it's my theory...what can I say?

I did watch that tonight and was totally nauseated by Woodward (as usual) although Bernstein didn't mince any words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. there's nothing wrong with that theory at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It's not tinfoil.
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 09:56 PM by scarletwoman
Woodward is an operative working for the BFEE and Associates. They wanted Nixon gone -- too much of a loose cannon -- and Woodward, whose background was in INTELLIGENCE, not journalism, was just the guy they needed.

People have bought into the bogus fairy tale that democracy was "saved" when Nixon was brought down. The fact is, it was internicine warfare between crime syndicates, and the REALLY EVIL guys won.

The Watergate scandal was essentially the triumph of the totally fascist wing of the Republican Party. Nixon was a paranoid nutcase who was careening out of control. He made the mistake of thinking he was actually in charge, when it was really his handlers who were busy consolidating power. Once he became a possible liability, he had to go.

And Woodward was just the guy in the position to do the dirty work. Never forget that the Washington Post has been a CIA-owned propaganda organ since the 40's. Do a search on "Project Mockingbird".

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You just framed my theory way better than I could ever attempt to do
I didn't know about "project mockingbird" but what you just described above is exactly what I now think about Watergate.

I had to laugh last night... Woodward was going on and on about the terrible crimes of Nixon when Nixon IMO was like mother Theresa compared to this *thing* we have in charge now.

I didn't agree with the policies of Nixon nor did I like tha man,
but I would welcome his ghost running the country right about now over this bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Exactly the same as my longheld belief. No doubt about it for me.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 12:29 PM by blm
Woodward is longtime BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. He needs to shit or get off the pot NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. He just dosent want anything to over shadow Watergate and kick him
out of the spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC