Sandy Berger's "Documents In His Pants" Coverage vs. Rovegate Coverage
Yavin4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-05 11:55 AM
Original message |
Sandy Berger's "Documents In His Pants" Coverage vs. Rovegate Coverage |
|
Two men accused of compromising National Security. One man worked for Clinton. The other man works for Bush. It would be a good little experiment for some Liberal bloggers out there to contrast and compare the coverage of each story, though the Rove accusation is far, far greater than what Berger did.
|
ChiDem
(238 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The Rove story is EVERYWHERE |
|
Just take a look around you, the coverage is amazing
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
2. The wingnuts already claim Berger got a free pass on that... |
|
...I guess because he wasn't shot.
|
Garbo 2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-12-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Also, what Berger took were his own notes from when he was in the WH. |
|
Dumb thing to do, but in no way comparable to leaking the ID of a CIA agent associated with undercover ops on WMD proliferation and a CIA front company.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.