Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reverse Leaking? MILLER as "Carrier". Obstruction. 8 Redacted Pages Docs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:34 AM
Original message
Reverse Leaking? MILLER as "Carrier". Obstruction. 8 Redacted Pages Docs.
*******QUOTE*******

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000977538

.... So Miller was fingered by an administration official back in the summer of 2004, and then she was subpoenaed? Then, one theory goes, she covers for him or her by claiming she was working on a story, hoping to throw the cloak of "reporter's privilege" over the conversation. By not agreeing to testify, Miller -- along with that official -- might thereby have been involved in obstruction of justice. It would require her oral testimony to confirm what games the White House-level official was playing. ....

A novel theme emerging in some press coverage of the Plame case raises the possibility of unnamed journalists being participants in a potential crime, and not just witnesses. Carol Leonnig of The Washington Post wrote on July 6: "Sources close to the investigation say there is evidence in some instances that some reporters may have told government officials -- not the other way around --that Wilson was married to Plame, a CIA employee." ....

She may have just been helping to spin the neo-conservatives' gossip. Her "source" is incidental, as she wrote nothing. No evidence has been presented that she even contemplated writing a story. None of her colleagues at the newspaper that I have spoken to over the past two years have suggested that she was actively working on a story about Plame.

But talking to someone at a high level somehow got her on Fitzgerald's list. She may have both received the information on Plame from a high official, who was trying to smear Wilson, and spread it as a "carrier" to another one. Or maybe she already knew what Plame's job was, as her government beat was WMD.

If this scenario is close to the reality of what happened, her "cover" is likely to be blown if and when the special prosecutor releases the information from those crucial redacted eight pages of court documents that persuaded one judge after another to hold her in contempt in the first place. What's in those pages is obviously key to the whole Miller case. ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reverse leaking . . . wouldn't that be sucking?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I still wonder if Bolton had a hand in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pat Buchanan raised the possibility that Miller may be charge with....
"obstruction of justice" if she is covering for something criminal. On the Imus show, they were guessing as to what possible information she could have??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is OLD NEWS
It has no validity to it, they are just speculating out of their ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. So It's News, Old, AND Speculation Simultaneously. Nice Job.
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 10:00 AM by UTUSN
"Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine." --Rick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes, they say it is speculation themselves
"Speculation grows that the special prosecutor is looking at the possibility that unnamed journalists "started a chain of conversations,"..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, & Just about Every Media Yakker Also Says Nobody Knows.
Meaning that just about everything posted here on the topic is speculation. The post was intended as food for discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. remember Jim Angle/FoxNews RAN to WH w/ info on an
interview that "exposed" Richard Clarke as knowing/saying something that didn't jive w/ his testimony on the hill? (during the "your country failed you" days)

--OMG I can definitely imagine a faux weasel tripping over him/herself to HELP the WH can't you????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC