Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DIEBOLD: Md. to use 'high-risk' voting machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:00 AM
Original message
DIEBOLD: Md. to use 'high-risk' voting machines
Md. to use 'high-risk' voting machines
By TOM STUCKEY
Associated Press
09/25/2003

ANNAPOLIS -- Maryland will go ahead with plans to buy $55.6 million worth of electronic voting machines, relying on a consultant's report that numerous potential security problems can be fixed before the presidential primary next March.

"We remain very confident in this voting system," James "Chip" DiPaula, state budget secretary, said Wednesday.

He said Diebold Election Systems has already incorporated three new security features to correct problems that critics of the touch-screen machines say made them vulnerable to massive election fraud.

Other "vulnerabilities" cited by the consultant, Science Application International Corp., will be corrected by security procedures to be implemented by state and local election boards, DiPaula said.

----snip----

The report did not satisfy Avi Rubin, an associate professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University, whose study released in July prompted national debate over the security of electronic voting systems. Rubin, lead researcher on the report, said at the time that the Diebold system was so flawed it could be easily manipulated.

Rubin noted Wednesday that the consultant's report said the existing system "is at high risk of compromise" and that it confirmed some of the major flaws he found in the voting machines.

"I think the logical thing to do at this point is to suspend plans to use that system," he said.

David Dill, a Stanford University computer science professor, said he still has concerns about the machines, including the possibility that a malicious code could be inserted by a programmer at Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. This deal would never have gone through under a Dem. governor.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, unfortunately, it probably would....
Georgia is a case in point.

The real problem with stupidity in politics is that it is truly non-partisan.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. watch for Maryland
to vote overwhelmingly republican for the first time ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC