Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript from todays Press Briefing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:09 PM
Original message
Transcript from todays Press Briefing.
David "Franchie" Gregory

Q Scott, you know what, to make a general observation here, in a previous administration, if a press secretary had given the sort of answers you've just given in referring to the fact that everybody who works here enjoys the confidence of the President, Republicans would have hammered them as having a kind of legalistic and sleazy defense. I mean, the reality is that you're parsing words, and you've been doing it for a few days now. So does the President think Karl Rove did something wrong, or doesn't he?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, David, I'm not at all. I told you and the President told you earlier today that we don't want to prejudge the outcome of an ongoing investigation. And I think we've been round and round on this for two days now.

Q Even if it wasn't a crime? You know, there are those who believe that even if Karl Rove was trying to debunk bogus information, as Ken Mehlman suggested yesterday -- perhaps speaking on behalf of the White House -- that when you're dealing with a covert operative, that a senior official of the government should be darn well sure that that person is not undercover, is not covert, before speaking about them in any way, shape, or form. Does the President agree with that or not?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, we've been round and round on this for a couple of days now. I don't have anything to add to what I've said the previous two days.

Q That's a different question, and it's not round and round --

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier.

Q It has nothing to do with the investigation, Scott, and you know it.

MR. McCLELLAN: You heard from the President earlier today, and the President said he's not --

Q That's a dodge to my question. It has nothing to do with the investigation. Is it appropriate for a senior official to speak about a covert agent in any way, shape, or form without first finding out whether that person is working as a covert officer.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, first of all, you're wrong. This is all relating to questions about an ongoing investigation, and I've been through this.

Q If I wanted to ask you about an ongoing investigation, I would ask you about the statute, and I'm not doing that.

MR. McCLELLAN: I think we've exhausted discussion on this the last couple of days.

Q You haven't even scratched the surface.

Q It hasn't started.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050713-7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pay no attention to the scandal behind the curtain
Hey you guys hear about that missing girl in aruba?

Sharks. Everywhere Sharks. Sharks! With big scary Teeth. Sharks. Look out! Sharks!!!

We must not dishonor those who died on september 11th by continuing to speak of lies I may or may not have spoken.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bj2110 Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And don't forget the hurricanes! Emily's a'comin!
And I live on the Gulf Coast for God's sake. I'm sick of the damn hurricane coverage....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Well i'm from Florida
So may have a different perspective. Or to put it another way, I'm sick of it too but not for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bj2110 Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I live in FL also. On the gulf, north of Tampa.
I'm sick of it because it ain't that important until about two days ahead of time. And anytime before then, it doesn't deserve any more than a mention and a quick glance at the map. I see it as just another device of fear. Why the hell does Joe Blow in Nebraska care about hurricanes on CNN? Why does every time I'm on the phone with somebody up north, the first question is, "So, what about those hurricanes??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Fair point
And that's about what i do as well - and they are less likely to hit me than you.

Mostly I go do my grocery shopping earlier cause going right before a hurricane is total madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Isn't Brad Pitt in the hospital? How's Michael Jackson doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bj2110 Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody's balls are getting bigger daily.... lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw Bush* speak to reporters during the Cabinet meeting and
he looked sheepish, like he knew it was going down and there is nothing he can do to stop it. So all he could say was "not to pre-judge" the investigation, hoping to buy a little time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. and Rove was right behind him-watching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah! The fourth estate! Good to see you!
Where the hell have you guys been? Hey! Have you heard about these Downing Street Minutes? Or this guy Jeff Gannon? How about *'s National Guard service?

Now that you guys are back, maybe you can FINALLY look for some of these answers!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is great stuff! Will he do it on any other subjects besides Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. more surface scratching, please!
good to see somebody besides Helen Thomas having the, um, gumption to ask tough questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. This was a fascinating question:
Jessica can't get him to confirm that the prosecutor did indeed ask him not to comment:

"MR. McCLELLAN: Let me go to Jessica, and then I'll come back to you.

Q Scott, I've spoken to one person at least who says that when -- after being interviewed by the special prosecutor was asked not to discuss subjects, the substance of their interview, but was free to talk about this investigation more broadly. So my question is, has the White House been asked by the special prosecutor not to talk about specific testimony, or to discuss nothing about this at all?

MR. McCLELLAN: These questions came up the last couple of days, and again --

Q But you haven't been explicit. Did the special prosecutor say to the White House --

MR. McCLELLAN: Again --

Q -- don't discuss this?

MR. McCLELLAN: I want to help the investigation proceed and come to a successful conclusion. And the best way to do that, as I've said, not only the last couple of days, but going back nearly two years, is to not get into discussing the investigation from this podium, and those questions --

Q Because the prosecutor asked you not to?

MR. McCLELLAN: And those questions I've been through the last couple of days, this morning, and there's really nothing to add. And I appreciate it, but we've exhausted this discussion, I think. And we need to let that investigation proceed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC