Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Is What Novak Wrote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:03 AM
Original message
This Is What Novak Wrote
"Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two
senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report."

That is exactly what was printed by Novak. Where in it does it does Novak say that 'I told a senior administration official what or who Wilson's Wife was"?

So if he lied in the article he should be fired and if he lied to the prosecutor he should be jailed. Your choice, doesn't matter to me one single bit as long as everyone knows which it was. Did he lie in the article or is he lieing now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. All the White House spin means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. That appears to be treasonous.
Perhaps one of these days Novak's employers will notice . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's probably lying both times
But it is at least theoretically possible that it happened like this.

Some senior administration official, let's call him "Cheney" just for conversation, calls up Novak and says "Hey, this is Cheney, you should tell your reporter buddies to back off on joe wilson; I didn't hire him, his wife, who works for the CIA as an operative, got him the job!"

Then a few minutes later Rove calls up and says "Hey Novak, how's it hanging man?

"Oh it's hanging fine man. I scored some primo cannibus from south of the border man. You want to come over and toke up?"

"NO man. I was wondering; you hear any trippy rumors lately?"

"Oh yeah, that space case Cheny called up and like tottaly told me that Joe Wilson's Wife is like a CIA Operative. That's how that dude got the job."

"Whoa. You mean she's like a spy."

"Yeah, I guess so."

"Wonder what it's like doing it with a spy. He he he he"

"Yeah, i looked it up. She has a really cool spy nam. It's . . ."

"Hey don't tell me man. I got an even better name in my head. So like are you going to write about it."

"Yeah man. Easy article. Writes itself."

"OK man. Later."

"Later."

So you see it is possible. But not likely I suppose.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alien8ed Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There's an operative term involved....
The RWW end is claiming variations upon the theme of information reaching Novak that Plame was "an analyst" through whose insider appointment her husband, Wilson, got some kind of a "boobdoggle" free ride to Niger - although why anyone would want to go to Niger, even cost-free seems to be a point that even Rove cannot successfully fantasize.

Thus, their escape clause rests mainly upon the cartoon of an "analyst" sitting in some CIA basement, analysing god-knows-what, but most likely in antique Vatican code.

Your direct quote, however, clearly uses the term "operative", meaning an active, covert officer on duty.

And that, kids, is what the guys with the handcuffs term, "an operative, dead-cinch, BUST".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. HI Alien8ed!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Welcome to DU :^D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Certainly, I'm not defender of Karl Rove, but I've read 3 articles
online today from NYT, WPo, and Associated Press. They all say that Rove was given the information about Plame from reporters, one of them being Novak. Do I believe that? Hell, no! I think that's their concocted story to give to the grand jury.

But lets say it is so: Could 2 WH officials, other than Rove, told Novak and he told Rove what he had heard and he wanted a third confirmation from Rove???

After reading the above articles from these news sources and hearing it on C-Span, it sounds to me like either Rove's lawyer leaked this info to the paper and/or someone from the Fitzgerald's office did...someone who is sympathetic to Bush and his lying scoundrels.

I also keeping remembering what Novak said one day not long ago on CNN that he would write about this when the investigation is over and that we would be surprised. I'll be surprised if anyone is indicted because of all the lies being told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Wonder who the other......
reporter was? IF there WAS another reporter. We need to find out who the second reporter was. novak is always smug but on this, his smugness is enough to make me wanna reach in the TV and slap the you-know-what outta him. No, actually, I ALWAYS wanna smack the snot outta him :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. TWO SENIOR
those are the key words.

We need TWO names and they have to be SENIOR administration officials-kinda narrows it down huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. As Cooper's attorney said yesterday
the Court's reviewed sealed investigation documents relative to this case and determined that two reporters must reveal their sources as a result. There is something very serious afoot here and neither we, nor any reporter for the NYT, WAPO, etc. know what information those sealed documents contain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. they are claiming that Rove wasnt one of those 2 senior officials
2 Senior officials told Novak and then Novak told Rove.

Rememeber Rove runs Washington and everyone is to save him 1st.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. He doesn't have to say anything in his article about telling a senior
administration official. This was a smear piece but not testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alien8ed Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Hi!" Back, and Thanks!
Karl Rove, bulk mailing list salesman, is a plain case of reaching a level of incompetence which he should never have even approached.

If Karl's down to, "Turn it ass-backwards and hope the fools don't notice," he's scraping the bottom of the umbrella stand, on his way out of the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC