Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So let me see if I have the new Treason-gate information flow figured out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 02:11 AM
Original message
So let me see if I have the new Treason-gate information flow figured out?
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 02:18 AM by Quixote1818
The plan seems to have been, have someone leak to Miller, have her leak to Novak and Cooper, have two Administration officials call Novak and get him to leak to them while at the same time have them confirm Plame was CIA so Novak would write the story, making it look like they didn't know anything about what happened. Then have Rove call Cooper and have Cooper leak to Rove just like with Novak. After Rove gets off the phone with Cooper, to cover himself Rove sends an e-mail reporting that Cooper told him that Plame was CIA even though he confirmed that she was CIA to make sure Cooper would write a story.

Meanwhile it looks like everyone is covered and can't be touched by the law and anyone looking into this would just give up.

Then enters Fitzgerald who smelled fish and didn't give up.

Did I get it right or did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. You forgot Scooter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am only mentioning those we know for sure. Do you think Scooter
leaked to Miller or was one of the two officials that talked to Novak and confirmed Plame was CIA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not sure, but I'd bet he was one source. Read this:
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 02:23 AM by Carolab
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1629014

{snip}

Moreover, evidence suggests that President Bush was aware as early as October 2003 that Rove and I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, were the sources who leaked Plame’s undercover CIA status to reporters. And after the president was briefed about the issue the president said publicly that the source of the leak will never be found.

Furthermore, a few aides to Condoleeza Rice, then head of the National Security Council, may have played a role as well by being the first officials to learn about Plame’s role as a CIA operative and giving that information to Rove, Libby and other senior administration officials.

{snip}

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think Gannon was used to leak to Miller (or whoever)
I think that idiot was brought in to serve such a purpose but I don't know the entire timeline backwards and forwards so I could be wrong.

It would make sense (to me)that Gannon was given the goods on Plame (shown classified info etc) that is why he wasn't signed in and out of the WH.

That way if everything were to blow sky high this could be pinned on Gannon being a rogue nosy guy in the whitehouse snooping around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent summary - I think that's what the WH will use as their "defense"
but I don't believe that these crooks actually plotted and planned out this as cleverly and well...I also think that there are far more people involved from the White House and I also believe that in the end, even if your scenario was proven to be the case, I think that Fitzgerald will eventually be able to prosecute based on the "coverup" of the crime, not the crime itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. You missed the important point
Cooper was not supposed to testify. The Novak/Rove cooked up story does not fly if Cooper tells that Rove leaked to him. No mention of Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC