...See what readers in Milwaukee think of what KKKarl Rove did and what consequences he should get.
<snip>
The Morning Mail
From Journal Sentinel readers
Last Updated: July 16, 2005
KARL ROVE
Leaking incident should mean the end of Rove
In response to the July 13 editorial "Should this leak sink Rove?" the obvious answer is "yes."
Advertisement
Rove and his attorney may claim plausible deniability by saying he didn't actually divulge Valerie Plame's name, but the Intelligence Protection Act states that the disclosure of "any information identifying (a) covert agent" is illegal. Rove may also attempt to dodge culpability by claiming he didn't know Plame was an agent. However, Time reporter Matt Cooper's e-mail says Rove was speaking on "double super secret background." Why would Rove insist on such a level of confidentiality unless he knew what he was divulging was sensitive information?
All of the evidence points to Rove as a source of the leak. President Bush has previously pledged that he would fire anyone in his administration who was involved in the leak. There are ample grounds for firing Rove, not the least of which is that his recklessness with intelligence information is detrimental to national security. Yet the latest word out of the White House is that Bush has every confidence in Rove.
The question now becomes: "Is Bush a man of his word or not?"
Lynda R. Prout
Milwaukee
<more>
<link>
http://www.jsonline.com/news/editorials/jul05/341288.asp