What if Coopers Testimony Contradicts Rove's?

[Quixote1818]

Sure we were leaked Roves testimony to the Grand Jury but so what? Of course if he was covering himself he would lie about what actually transpired between him and Cooper. It's a he said, he said situation and all we have as real evidence is Coopers notes and e-mails which seem to suggest something very different from the picture Rove painted.

It's obvious that Cooper came away from the conversation all excited about learning about some secret information. Why are we supposed to take Roves testimony as gospel? It's just his account and the only thing that is rock solid about what he said was the e-mail he wrote. He obviously new that that E-mail might end up being evidence eventually so he had all the time in the world to think about exactly what he wanted to say in it.

Am I missing something here?

[fob]

1. nofacts already contradicts rove so I suspect that cooper may

have a different version than rove too. The constant being rove is a LIAR.