Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Judith Miller in cahoots with the Bush Administration?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:15 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is Judith Miller in cahoots with the Bush Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "cahoots" = "bed"??? If so, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. bed?...lets just say cahoots. I can't take the word picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Other: Always has been, always will be
Whoever voted 'no' needs to google "Judith Miller" and "MET Alpha."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Judy is a Major Bush Whore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. can't we refrain from smearing whores and prostitutes. When
have they ever screwed the entire country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. She went to jail, Cooper didn't
I don't know either of them personally. I'd like to say that it's possible she feels a confidential source should remain just that, because it would set a precedent wherein no source could be protected.

It's possible that it's about journalism and being able to write without fear of being jailed every time one side disagrees with your article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. um, the SCOTUS, not her gets to make that decision
it has never been the case where the state could not imprison someone for not reveling information directly related to the commission of a crime.

miller is simply a bad human being and a profound liar. she is directly responsible for much of the disinformation that led to the iraq invasion, endangered our soldiers while she was imbredded with them in iraq, and has acted above the law on numerous occasions. she is getting what she deserves.

she is not joan of arc, she is pond scum and i hope when all is said and done she is run out of town on a rail.

but yes, as you say..."It's possible that it's about journalism and being able to write without fear of being jailed every time one side disagrees with your article."

and it just as possible monkeys will fly out your butt someday too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. "... not reveling information directly related
to the commission of a crime."

So, when Rove weasels his greasy way out of this, and I have confidence that he will, as all the "untouchables" in Washington will run off unscathed, does she get an apology because "no crime was committed"?

I'm honestly trying to understand the law regarding this, regardless of what may or may not fly out of my butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. nope, you have to present what you know to a grand jury
the purpose of sitting a grand jury is to find out if there is enough evidence to have the state say that a crime has been committed. the only way you get around it is to plead the 5th.

btw, madeline had a nice butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thanks for the info.
She may have a lot of confidential sources who would have been sweating bullets if she'd told about that particular one, so she went to jail. Someone may pay her a hefty sum when she gets out for staying quiet. ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. well, i voted 'yes', but what i think...
is that the bush admin set themselves up as the ultimate 'thing' you'd want to be a part of, or embedded with, if you were a 'journalist' & that access to them & their smug-ass, smirky world was parsed out by the ass kiss. miller isn't the only one who will be seen as willing to toss it all into the wind to sit at 'the mean girls' lunch table imo they're all over wash dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Haha
Rove the brain Miller the mouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Haha
:rofl:

If Rove's the brain, and Miller's the mouth, what's the Christian Cowboy? hahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Ahhh
Don't compare Christian and Cowboy to that piece of excrement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. I think he must be
Cheney's enlarged colon.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nabia2004 Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Judith Miller has always been with the Dark Side of the force
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is she just a corporate whore or a 'player'?
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 11:39 PM by LiviaOlivia
http://billmon.org/archives/002016.html

~snip~

We're into some deep ethical shit here, at least if you're a journalist or still have the values of one. Utlimately, it gets to a debate over the future of the First Amendment in a system increasingly dominated by money and power. But along the way, it makes an intermediate stop at the question of whether, net-net, it is still in the public interest for journalists to protect their sources from the long arm of the law.

I've always been an absolute supporter of the duty -- not the right, but the duty -- of reporters to protect their sources. There was a time when I would have been an equally unthinking, knee-jerk supporter of a federal shield law. But, after what's come to light about the Rovians and their cozy little circle of journalistic collaborators, I have to think about it.


Left to their own devices, corporate journalists seem increasingly inclined to act as an arm of the government, not a watchdog of it. Which means the licence granted by the traditions of the profession -- which in some ways extend even further than the legal rights guaranteed by the First Amendment -- can and are being used against the public interest, not to protect it. We seem to have run into yet another variation on the old Roman question: Quid custodiet ipsos custodes? Who shall watch the watchers?

~snip~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm betting Hannah was her source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call me Deacon Blues Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's simpler than that . . .
She's like every other Repug -- she's out for number one, and she's covering her own ass now that she's gotten caught. A Real Journalist is only after the truth; she's protecting a lie. News Flash Judy, your Pulitzer is worthless now. You can play the martyr all you want, but no one will ever believe another thing you write. She's not in bed with the Bushistas -- she's made her own bed. Now she has to lie (and that's a double entendre) in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Judy didn't 'Go' to the Dark Side
That's where she was all along.

The bed she made might be getting pretty lumpy about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. I agree. She whored the idea that Gadafi was a big threat
to the US during the Reagan years.

She didn't start whoring for Republican administrations just recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Judy Miller, NOC?
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 12:13 AM by RUMMYisFROSTED
:shrug:

Se-cret Agent (wo)man
Se-cret Agent (wo)man
They've given me a number
And taken away my Plame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Karl Rove needed a big megaphone to out Plame.
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 12:32 AM by Xap
Guess who he called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. I hope the prison
guards are having some fun with that nasty crack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. She always has been. Once a criminal neoconster, always a criminal ...
... neoconster. Judy used the 1st, first. She will soon only have the 5th on which to attempt to evade the truth. The Constitution that she has worked so diligently to destroy is the only reason she might get out of jail during the time of her trial for an untold number of acts of conspiracy and worse.

I just wonder how many of her bosses at NYT are complicit, but I have the fullest confidence Mr Fitzgerald will uncover that fact, as well.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. She is protecting herself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC