Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I know it's waaay too early for this, but is anyone else drooling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:40 PM
Original message
I know it's waaay too early for this, but is anyone else drooling
over the prospect of the presidential debates?

The possibilities are just incredible.

Here's how to pick a candidate that would shred Bush in the debates:
1) Find a dartboard. Hang it on the wall.
2) Tape pictures of the 10 current Democratic candidates randomly on the dartboard. Or in alphabetical order. Or in order of preference. Doesn't matter.
3) Close your eyes.
4) Throw a dart.
5) Pick the dart up off of the floor. Repeat steps 3-4 until your dart finds a candidate.

That candidate will just demolish Bush in the debate.

Strangely, the possible matchup that generates an evil grin the most for me is Sharpton/Bush. No way Sharpton will be the nominee, of course, but can you just imagine Bush blubbering trying to counter Al's wit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to worry, boxster:
Bush will be blubbering trying to counter any democrat's points. This is really a job for Will Ferrell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sharpton would have Bush for breakfest
then he'd chew on Gephardt and Kerry for lunch. Dinner would be Dean and Clark.

But Sharpton isn't gonna win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, To Tell The Truth
I have every expectation that I will indeed get to see the debate that I wish to see. I whole heartedly expect to see Bush have to debate Clark, and it doesn't take a third eye to see how that will go.

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. The chimp* ain't going to debate
not if kkkarl can help it. They'll find some lame excuse to avoid it, because he know that the moron* would be lunch for anyone coming at him.
The only way the trained monkey* comes close to a debate is like chicken ahnold, have the questions in advance, no deviation, the moron* isn't about to debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichV Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He'll have to debate
It's tradition at this point. But it's also worth remembering how badly we all thought Gore would tear Bush to shreds. Didn't exactly happen that way, as far as the public was concerned.

Sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. MMMMMMMMMMMMWAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAHHH...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eric_schafer Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. killer!
I'm for Dean, but that's freakin' awesome!

"Dress-up box"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't you remember that they said this about Gore, too?
This is naive chatter. The debates are structured so that it's very difficult to deal at the level of substance. The whole 90 minutes can pass with only soundbites being uttered. How else could Arnold even be on the same stage with Camejo the other night?

Gore possessed great advantages in terms of knowledge, quality of positions, & supposed debating skill, yet didn't "demolish" Bush at all. He barely laid a glove on him. Gore was a pretty high-quality candidate -- at least as good as many in the current field. So I'd be cautious about making such cheerful predictions.

I do agree, though, with your point about Sharpton. THAT's a matchup I'd pay to see -- no matter how the debates are structured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. it's different now
in reality, Gore DID demolish Bush. The only reason this wasn't obvious to everyone is that people gave Bush the benefit of the doubt.

But now we know Bush, and that makes a HUGE difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Plus Gore LIED about going to a wildfire of flood with some guy.
That obliterated any intelligent discussion the next 3 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yeah, and don't forget the schooldesk "scandal".
That was just about the most pathetic excuse for a front-page-for-a-week story I've ever seen. That's when I began to think Gore was screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Bush LIED about the Patients Bill of Right in Texas
He said he led a bi-partisan coalition to get this passed.

In fact, he vetoed it the first time. The second time it came to his desk it had a veto-proof majority so he just "didn't veto it". He didn't sign it, he just didn't veto it.

That was an out-and-out LIE! He knew it, he intended to do it, and he did it. But what's worse is he got a pass on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Exaclty
Bush "won" because people had misunderestimated him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. bush 'won' because the public accepted the media whore spin.
The first polls just after the first debate showed a majority who thought that Gore won. But after a few days, and RELENTLESS media whore ridicule of Gore, and their categorical insistance that Dumbo won, the polls reversed. At that point I knew we were f----d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. But the media whores will prevail,
unless our guy TOTALLY cleans bush's clock. As you saw this week, after the CA debates, they will absolutely hand bush each debate. No matter how bad bush is. So we have to have a candidate who can demolish bush, in such a way that the most dimwitted swing voter 'gets it'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Actually, the media just spun it that Bush "won" the debates.
Will they do it again? Maybe. No matter how stupid his remarks, there'll be some commentators out there who drool about his "clarity" or "leadership qualities" shown in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes, you are correct, though Gore needed to
lay off the "lockbox"!

Seriously though, I half expected Gore to have a Dukakis moment, "I can't believe I'm losing to this guy."

The media just killed Gore after the debates. They disected every word he said while ignoring the obvious BS answers Bush spouted. Bush has even more control over the media now than he did then, so it's very likely we could see more of the same.

The difference, I believe, is that the public has had some time to realize just how transparent and phony Bush is. Though, 49% still inexplicable support him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. A crackhead wino could kick Chimpy's ass in a debate.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 04:00 PM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. What makes you so sure there will even be a debate?
I'd be surprised if Bush agrees to three debates like last time. Instead, they'll probably proposed a single debate, moderated by "fair and balanced" Bill O'Reilly, to be broadcast at 2:00 am on Fox New.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Only someone such as you, dolstein,
would be able to actually have me concern myself about this...but, when you suggest it, I pay attention!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. It won't matter
50% of the population lives in a delusional world where no matter what Dubya says, it has to be the greatest thing ever said, therefore it is the greatest thing ever said.

He could get up there, drop his pants and wiggle his banana and they would call him America's saviour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hey, I tried it
I missed, hit my Tickle-Me Elmo and your theory still holds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That is just about the best posting I have seen today.
Thanks for making me laugh. :D

The scary thing is that I still see Bush blubbering.

Of course, Fox would accuse Elmo of being a commie/pinko, America-hating liberal even before the debate starts.

Hey, wait a minute, if Bush wore his flight suit to the debate, both candidates would be stuffed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Then
yours has to be the second best. (Stroke, stroke)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I tell ya....
this is a hell of a lot less stressful (and more fun) than trying to talk sense to the conspiracy theorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's if Rove allows an open debate forum...
that's not completely staged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. NONONONONONONONONONONONONONO!!!!
ACK. Don't you remember 2000? We couldn't wait for the debate between Bush and Gore because Gore would destroy Bush. Expectations of Bush were so low that when he walked onto the stage with his shoes tied he'd already done better than anyone thought. Everyone thought Bush had won!!! (Gore sighing didn't help. Dang.)

Don't build up expectations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. There are other responses in the thread similar to this -
and you're partially correct, though "lockbox" and sighing certainly didn't help Gore. He was right about the "lockbox", but I think the average person tired very quickly of that. Once that happened, he was screwed.

One difference this time is that I think the public knows Bush better now. If his poll numbers continue to drop, people will be more likely to actually expect something coherent out of him. I don't think he can compete if that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. gee, I thought Gore demolished Shrub, but people actually said otherwise
Nobody seems to understand anything anymore, and all anyone has to do is say a few cute one-liners to "win" a debate.

Started with Reagan and "here he goes again".

Disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC