Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

oh, the beautiful irony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:23 PM
Original message
oh, the beautiful irony
the possibility that jr. could be impeached because of a law sr. passed:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/07/17/ING17DNJT81.DTL

<exerpt>
Renegade ex-CIA agent Philip Agee spent years ripping the masks off fellow secret spies -- hundreds of them.

Troubled by U.S. covert activities in Latin America, in the 1970s he wrote an expose and launched the bimonthly "Covert Action Information Bulletin, " a Who's Who of CIA operatives with detailed biographies. By Agee's estimate, the Agency had 5,000 officers experienced in clandestine operations, and he gleefully predicted "it should be possible to identify almost all of those who have worked under diplomatic cover."

The CIA was flabbergasted to discover no law against this. But it had a powerful friend in the next U.S. vice president, a former CIA director. George H. W. Bush made it his mission to get legislation making it a felony to out a covert agent. "I don't care how long I live, I will never forgive Philip Agee and those like him who wantonly sacrificed the lives of intelligence officers, " he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's nice and all...............
but since Shrubby hates Poppy I think this particular bit of legislation will be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think it will be ignored, but all the legal beagles say it's very
hard to prove guilt under that particular law. They say it was really written to snag one guy, and you end up having to prove what somebody "knew". I think there are many other laws that are applicable in this case though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope you're right.............
justice needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Together, everybody: Perjury. Obstruction of Justice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC