Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Do Bush and Cheney not have to Testify Under Oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:51 PM
Original message
Why Do Bush and Cheney not have to Testify Under Oath
regarding the Plame case?


Why do they not have to be Under Oath like everyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. When they touch a bible it burns their flesh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL! OMG that's funny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Beat me again, ya rascal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. whether to take testimony under oath is up to the person...
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM by mike_c
...or committee, etc taking the testimony. Likewise, anyone can simply refuse to testify under oath-- then it's up to the persons seeking testimony to decide whether to compel an appearance or whether to take their testimony anyway.

on edit-- I like reply #1 better....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3.  Uhm why do they stand in the sun and not burst in flames?
Or enter into rooms into uninvited or touch holy items and not scream ? The ways of the undead are not for the ways of living to know :D JK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are not Bill Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. They took an oath when they were sworn into office????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am sure they may be saving the best for last.................
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 04:57 PM by Rebellious Republica
Once the impeachment proceedings begin, they will have no choice!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have yet to hear any top Democrats call for them to go under oath....
In fact, I dont recall any top Democrats having a problem with them refusing to go under oath during the Iraq hearings either.

All I can tell ya is to keep spinning your wheels- "Why wont they go under oath and clear this up?" is a GREAT talking point, but dont expect Top Democrats to have your back on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Depends on whether they got blowjobs or not
Presidents who get BJs have to be under oath. All others do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody has Nailed Bush re: He Should Have Asked Rove Already
Nobody in the press or the opposition has held Bush's feet to the fire and asked him why he hasn't gotten a full explanation from Rove and Libby and Cheney. Because either he has and doesn't care or he hasn't because he craves plausible deniability.

The new frame (meme) is: Bush Failed to Fire Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. If they go before the Grand Jury they have to go under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. It Was The 9-11 Commission They Refused To Be Sworn At

When they testified as puppet and puppeteer.

Filthy traitorous bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know the situation regarding
Kings and Queens but I take it they just don't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who the fuck would believe them if they did, anyway??
God how I despise these bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paula777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think being under oath would keep them from lying
It's not like they really believe the religous stuff that they spout - that's just so the merican people find em likeable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Duh. They'd have to tell the truth.
Come on. We can't have that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC