Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone see Lanny Davis (Clinton Lawyer) on CNN w/Blitzer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:59 PM
Original message
Did anyone see Lanny Davis (Clinton Lawyer) on CNN w/Blitzer?
He was saying that Dems need to "back off" the Rove/Libby thing. That Bush should apologize to Wilson/Plame and "wait for the Prosecutor" to have his final say.

I'm watching him...and wanting to throw rocks at Lanny & my monitor...but he actually pused Wolfie into pointing out all the crap the Bush Lies have caused: from Scotty's saying Bush said he'd fire people down to today when Scotty says that "we have to wait for the final report of the Independent Counsel." ...blank...blank...no comment ..no comment...repeat...repeat ....repeat.

But Lanny said Dems should NOT come out at this point and confront the Repugs...because it's better to let them hang on their own rope...but that Bush should "apologize for for the outing of a CIA Agent."

What do you all think about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. apologize?
He can resign and stand trial for treason if he wants to make amends. "Apologies" are irrelevant to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. All the PR dueling that is going on is somewhat irrelevent
The only talk that matters at this point is what is said in front of that Grand Jury.

The Democrats should feel free to throw a few haymakers if they feel it will help them politically, but the case itself won't be affected by anything that is said in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbwarming Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Smooth. He's pushing responsibility for the leak onto Bush*.
(Not holding my breath for the apology)

I'd prefer that Rove is still in the employ of the administration when he's indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Lanny is smooth--and did a great job of suggesting that Bush
is the one ultimately responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. If the Repugs
had stepped back and said nothing about Clinton I'd agree with him. But we had 8 years of unrelenting crap. Guess they think we've forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I had "mixed feelings" about his spiel....Having heard Tom Daschle say
the same thing after Bush stole the Election 2000 and going into the "Mid-Term Elections" that he cautioned Dems to pull back..and give the FUCKERS the Noose to hang themselves.

Here we are in 2005...Daschle got defeated due in part to Jeff Gannon/Guckerts work for Rove and he's making millions and his "rope to hang them" is frayed and rotten out there somewhere and has not netted one Repug Neck!

So..when Lanny says ...wait! hold back! don't speak out...and yet every day our Dems are trashing Howard Dean...I do wonder what the F**k our party stands for! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think he probably means Dem Senators and other spokespeople.
Personally, I think some Dems have excellent sytles of dealing with propaganda. Podesta is excellent, Blumenthal, Conason, Dean and others . They talk straight. They phrase issues in original ways. They don't use hackneyed and predictable arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC