Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why would Shrub try to upstage Traitorgate NOW???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:43 PM
Original message
Why would Shrub try to upstage Traitorgate NOW???
Doesn't he have until October to announce his nominee? And isn't October also the month when the Grand Jury will be finished and will likely hand down indictments?

So, wouldn't it make more sense to try to upstage it THEN, when it's likely to be much bigger than it is right now?

Does this mean something really big is about to break re. Traitorgate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, actually he would want to appoint with enough time to
allow the Senate to confirm by October. That being said, he is grandstanding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Point taken --
-- but my question still stands. As it is, by the time Fitz is done, the SC nomination story will likely have settled, and is unlikely to be good fodder when they will REALLY need fodder: when Rove, Scooter & Co. are indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. because with Scooter Libby's name coming up, the talk
is edging closer to Cheney. Now we're talking about Cheney's aide, soon we'll be speculating about Cheney himself, and after that, who will the media be speculating about? The net keeps getting bigger and the implications are not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. packing the bench for the trial
It's transparent enough already without thinking very hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. He figures it's a lot easier getting a SC nominee through now ...
than when he is getting impeached.

These boys are going DOWN. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. He needs to get Rove out of the headlines! It's hurting Shrub!
His ratings have been falling and this Rove mess is making it worse, so he believes he can get it off the front page with this nominee. He's probably right, but only temporarily.

He doesn't really have until Oct. The Senate Confirmation will take a while, and if there's hostility, it's will take a lot longer! You also have to remember, the Senate takes the month of August off and doesn't come back until after Labor day (I think). That only allows a little over a month for fighting! Not very long in Senate time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is called flailing. Even if he diverts media attention from Rove
for awhile, the Abu Ghraib photos and videos are being released on Friday.

And the leak investigation is legal matter, not a PR issue. It's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I totally agree -- it's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cheney*s name is currently hitting the fan. The president won't let
bush* hang him out to dry like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe he's banking on Renquist's resignation
He seems to get bailed out when he needs it. And then for October, there will be the yearly budget fights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC