Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Voice: Edith Clement Pro-Killing, Not Good for Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:09 PM
Original message
Conservative Voice: Edith Clement Pro-Killing, Not Good for Supreme Court
Edith Clement is being touted as proper and clean for Supreme Court appointment. Not if the pro-lifers have anything to say and do about it.

She has stated that the United States Constitution permits the right to have an abortion and that "the law is settled in that regard."

"The thought of Clement on the bench also has eased fears among abortion-rights advocates. She has stated that the Supreme Court, 'has clearly held that the right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution includes the right to have an abortion' and that 'the law is settled in that regard.'" — Fox News, July 19, 2005

Nix on Clement.

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/articles/article.html?id=6992
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Orin Hatch....the WH has a make-up date for you upon Rehnquist retirement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that is true, fine by me.
Considering we're not going to get a liberal on the bench, this might be the best we can get.

That said, it's always a crap-shoot how any nominee will actually perform while in office. They tend to get a little independent once inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gosh I hope so, however
she is apparantly a super-corporatist --- I'm just as concerned about that, maybe moreso... Corporations already have too much power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes
The GOP is a coalition of fundies and corporatists. She is definitely a nod to the latter -- while it is the former who are foaming at the mouth expecting "payback".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Counterpunch: Laura's Justice? Meet Edith Brown Clement
July 19, 2005

Laura's Justice?
Meet Edith Brown Clement
By JOSHUA FRANK

Washington is abuzz with speculation that Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Edith Brown Clement is to be President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, which the White House has announced this evening during a televised address at 9pm EST.

Pro-choice advocates will likely be relieved if Clement ends up being the nominee, as she has said on several occasions that she believes the Supreme Court has already spoken definitively in favor of abortion rights.

Judge Clement is supposed to be one of the few potential Supreme Court candidates on Bush's short-list that would have a speedy confirmation process. Many top Democrats, including Harry Reid, speak highly of her. She's had only a few controversial decisions to her name, but the few she has ruled on are quite telling about her penchant for justice.

Take a case last January in which Clement blocked a jury award for Rickey Brown who had been injured working on an offshore Texas oil-rig. Brown injured his back in the incident, and because he had not told his employer, Parker Drilling, prior to his being hired that he had previously been treated in an emergency room for a back injury (which had no relation to his injury incurred on the job), Clement felt that the company owed him nothing for injuries suffered while working for the drilling company.


snip


http://www.counterpunch.org/frank07192005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. pro killing? so is bush.. a perfect match nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. If this is true ...
... and not a smokescreen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC