Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Roberts is the Nominee for Supreme Court!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:47 PM
Original message
John Roberts is the Nominee for Supreme Court!
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 06:51 PM by Nimble_Idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. you're kidding
Ok, let's get ready for a real battle!! And I mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. yeah he chose to shut down the govt
what a pissant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. we are screwed
General Background. Mr. Roberts, a partner at the D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson, has long-standing and deep connections to the Republican Party. He is a member of the Republican National Lawyers Association and worked as a political appointee in both the Reagan and Bush I administrations. President George H.W. Bush nominated Mr. Roberts to the D.C. Circuit, but he was considered by some on the Senate Judiciary Committee to be too extreme in his views, and his nomination lapsed. He was nominated by President George W. Bush to the same seat in May 2001.

Reproductive Rights. s a Deputy Solicitor General, Mr. Roberts co-wrote a Supreme Court brief in Rust v. Sullivan,1 for the first Bush administration, which argued that the government could prohibit doctors in federally-funded family planning programs from discussing abortions with their patients. The brief not only argued that the regulations were constitutional, notwithstanding the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, but it also made the broader argument that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided - an argument unnecessary to defend the regulation. The Supreme Court sided with the government on the narrower grounds that the regulation was constitutional.

Environmental Issues. As a student, Mr. Roberts wrote two law review articles arguing for an expansive reading of the Contracts and Takings clauses of the Constitution, taking positions that would restrict Congress' ability to protect the environment. As a member of the Solicitor General's office, Mr. Roberts was the lead counsel for the United States in the Supreme Court case Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, in which the government argued that private citizens could not sue the federal government for violations of environmental regulations.

As a lawyer in private practice, Mr. Roberts has also represented large corporate interests opposing environmental controls. He submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the National Mining Association in the recent case Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Association. 3 In this case, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit reversed a district court ruling that had stopped the practice of "mountaintop removal" in the state of West Virginia. Citizens of West Virginia who were adversely affected by the practice had sued the state, claiming damage to both their homes and the surrounding area generally. Three Republican appointees - Judges Niemeyer, Luttig, and Williams - held that West Virginia's issuance of permits to mining companies to extract coal by blasting the tops off of mountains and depositing the debris in nearby valleys and streams did not violate the 1977 Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act.4 This decision was greeted with great dismay by environmental groups. In another case, Roberts represented one of several intervenors in a case challenging the EPA’s promulgation of rules to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions.5

Civil Rights. After a Supreme Court decision effectively nullified certain sections of the Voting Rights Act, Roberts was involved in the Reagan administration's effort to prevent Congress from overturning the Supreme Court's action.6 The Supreme Court had recently decided that certain sections of the Voting Rights Act could only be violated by intentional discrimination and not by laws that had a discriminatory effect, despite a lack of textual basis for this interpretation in the statute. Roberts was part of the effort to legitimize that decision and to stop Congress from overturning it.

Religion in Schools. While working with the Solicitor General's office, Mr. Roberts co-wrote an amicus brief on behalf of the Bush administration, in which he argued that public high schools can include religious ceremonies in their graduation programs, a view the Supreme Court rejected.7

Pro Bono. Mr. Roberts has engaged in significant pro bono work while at Hogan and Hartson, including representation of indigent clients and criminal defendants.

Other Information. Mr. Roberts is a member of two prominent, right-wing legal groups that promote a pro-corporate, anti-regulatory agenda: the Federalist Society and the National Legal Center For The Public Interest, serving on the latter group's Legal Advisory Council.

Mr. Roberts lists his net worth as over $3.7 million.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I might as well get my pink triangle out
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Mainstream", huh?
I'm sure he'll interpret the Bible EXACTLY as it's written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Time To FIGHT!!! Bring It George!
Remember Bolton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. SHUT IT DOWN!!
yeaaaaaaaarggg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hate Bush...I just can't hate anyone, anymore than I do him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If Only We COULD Hate Him More!
I have maxxed out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. OK. Tell me about John Roberts!
Who the hell is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ugh! The damned Federalist Society! Shit!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just what about women don't you like?
Just what about the environment don't you like?

Just what about minorities don't you like?

This - person - looks to be a real step backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Come on kids- did we really think that he'd give in to the left on this?
Bush did exactly what we knew he'd do- appoint one of his own AND Rovegate is off of the front page. Fasten your seat belts- this is going to be an interesting ride. Press is saying he's a moderate conservative with good qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. he's not saying "nuke Mecca"
So he's "moderate" compared to some of the neofascists. What a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. lol
so true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. *
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 07:05 PM by enid602
Why should he select anyone less doctrinaire and controversial, when * has so much political capital to spend to ensure things get done his way. I think this is a message; despite all the recent drubbings to which he and his underlings have been subjected, despite high dissatisfaction, low polls and a now comparatively restive media, he still wants things done his way or no way at all. I think he's saying he'll go down with the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeachyDem88 Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't think so.
I don't think he's saying that he wants to go down with the ship.

I think that this move pleases a great deal of people... People in all the right states. I think that this move not only raises his approval ratings, but, along with the 24 hour conservative media frenzy, will cause Democrats to seem like obstructionists.

That's assuming that our beloved Democrats don't roll over and play dead from the outset.

We've got a lot of fighting to do, and our Senators will have to meet us half way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm betting on a complete sell-out after the perfunctory media show
for the suckers who they will drain of a couple million to pay for the show. RIP democracy and the late great Democratic Party rally round USA Inc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC