Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Republican Reps. response on the Downing St. Memo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 04:59 AM
Original message
My Republican Reps. response on the Downing St. Memo
I'm in Connecticut, and Republican & ex-CIA "analyst" Rob Simmons is my congressional representative. A few weeks back, I had emailed him on the Downing Street Memo and last night he sent back a PDF of a Washington Post editorial from June 15, 2005 that basically says it adds no facts to the debate:

(forgive my bad cut & paste job, I'm not sure how to do from PDF)

Iraq, Then and Now

AFTER LAGGING for months, debate on
Iraq in Washington is picking up again.
. That's a needed and welcome devel-
opment, but much of the discussion is being
diverted to the wrong subject. War opponents
have been trumpeting several British government
memos from July 2002, which describe
the Bush administration's preparations for invasion,
as revelatory of President Bush's de-
'ceptions about Iraq. Bloggers have demanded
to know why "the mainstream media" have
,not paid more attention to them. Though we
"~'t 'speak for The Post's news department,
the answer appears .obvious: The memos add
not a single fact to what was previously known
'al;)out the administration's prewar delibera-
'Jions. Not only that: They add nothing to what
~s publicly known in July 2002.
, " Three summers ago the pages of this and
,other newspapers were filled with reports
.about military planning for war to remove Saddam
Hussein and Mr. Bush's determination to
force a showdown. "Debate over whether the
'United States should go to war against Iraq, "
\ve stated in a lead editorial on Aug. 4, "has
-lUrched into a higher gear." Concern that the
"B!1shadministration was not adequately pre-
"pared for a postwar occupation - another
supposed revelation of the British memos -
'prompted widely reported public hearings by
.the SenateForeignRelationsCommitteestart-
'mg on July 31, 2002.
.....<rest cut out>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't hear a word you said, did he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. nope
still repeating that "old news" meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've had the same thing happen with the addition
that they wanted to know the source I heard it from... Yep. That's right. They wanted to know the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Somedays it's not even worth chewing through the restraints" is it?
It's so frustrating isn't it? It's like all of the DC Republican politicians are all walking around with their fingers stuck in their ears loudly singing "La la la la la I can't hear you La la la la la" in the hopes that if they ignore us long enough we and the situation will shut up and go away. :eyes:

If it wasn't going be like teaching a pig to sing you could always respond with a nice big pdf of FACTS from one of the wonderful "talking points" and/or case against BushCo postings here complete with LOTS of links to good sources to back it all up. Ask that he please address each point individually, thoroughly and with more then just an editorial *opinion* to back up what he's saying. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Is there a good summary somewhere?
Of all the facts?

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The GOP is a bunch of "Vancome Ladies" :) n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rob Simmons is part of the problem
He's a fascist enabler.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. late morning kick
hoping to get some a place for a good summary that I can email back to him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. hope this helps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC