Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stripes letters on the "I miss Clinton" T-shirt controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:04 PM
Original message
Stripes letters on the "I miss Clinton" T-shirt controversy
Nothing wrong with T-shirt

In response to “T-shirt inappropriate for GI” (letter, July 14), the writer explains that a T-shirt stating “I miss Clinton” is wrong for a GI to wear.

How is this wrong to wear? A soldier has the right to vote. This means that they are often affiliated with one side or the other of our political spectrum. I do not, however, see how wearing a T-shirt could be viewed as a strike against our current president.

I, along with a number of my squad, are Democratic. I would agree with the T-shirt. In no way does this mean that I will not perform the duties I am tasked to do; that doesn’t mean I will fail to follow the orders of my commander in chief just because I do not agree with his party.

Since when do we as a country have to alter what we can and cannot wear based on who controls the White House?

I took an oath to follow my commander in chief. This in no way means that my views and beliefs are null and void. Does this mean that bumper stickers denoting a bias to one side of politics over another are wrong if the opposing party is in office? I think not.

We are a free nation, able to debate issues that concern us, and vote. If we were unable to voice our opinions in the military, then wouldn’t you think that would coincide with having the right to vote stripped from the military as well?

This would never happen, and just goes to show that although our brothers and sisters in arms might not agree with the current way issues in our nation are handled, we still perform our jobs as our oath of enlistment requires us to do.

**************

Another offensive T-shirt?

While we’re busy getting rid of T-shirts that offend captains (“T-shirt inappropriate for GI”), we should take a hard look at the patently offensive “World’s No.1 DAD” T-shirts, whose blatant disrespect toward mothers is unparalleled in the casual-apparel industry.

Any person who ever spent any time in a womb should find these T-shirts an egregious slap in the face of motherhood.

I wonder: Had the T-shirt in the picture read “I miss Reagan” instead of “I miss Clinton,” would the captain still have been offended?

***********************

It’s just a T-shirt

My grandfather served in the Army during World War I. My father served in the Navy during World War II. Both of my brothers served in the Army during Vietnam. My sister also served in the Navy in the early 1970s.

I’m sure they missed Clinton, too — Clinton, Iowa (“T-shirt inappropriate for GI”).

Sometimes a T-shirt is just a T-shirt.

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=30464



http://stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=29455&archive=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think it's wrong for them to wear that T-Shirt either, but
when I visited my son when he was stationed in Whidby Island Wa. we took a tour of the base. When we walked past the wall displaying a picture of every US President, (Clinton was at the time) he got a disgusted look on his face, and said that's my current CIC. I noticed and asked "Oh, you don't like him huh?" He told me we are not permitted to speak against our Commander in Chief!

I think this has been a philosophy of the military for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Petty Officer wore the T-shirt on his time
and wore it off base, while jumping from, I presume, 15,000 feet. The Petty Officer paid money out of his own pocket to jump at a private jump club. He can wear what he wants to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's not the way the military looks at it.
They will all tell you, when you sign up, you give up all your rights! You are NOW THE PROPERTY OF THE US MILITARY!

I'm not kidding! They are really told that, and I suspect, the papers they sign confirm it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Petty Officer had to be BEGGED to reenlist because he doesn't like *
What's Rummy going to do? Kick him out of the Navy??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. If he has the option, he shouldn't reenlist!
I spent the last 18 years telling my son that the military brain washes everybody, and I still believe that! It's gotten a little more lax in the last several years, but they still wont take no for an answer. You do what your told!

I'm not sure why he would beg to reenlist, that he would have to tell you.

I know you don't like to hear what I'm saying, but I have no reason to lie here. My son is not in the Navy anymore, although he is still working on a civilian Navy contract for a civilian employer. He detests Shrub almost as much as I do, but that don't speak ill of the CIC is still there. The worst I've heard him say was "He's responsible for THAT TOO?" After I told him some other BS thing ShrubCo has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The petty officer had to be begged, not the reverse
Though, on the blue to green program, perhaps the T-shirt logo was "overboard," especially if the Petty Officer hopes to stay blue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. yep, kid in the reserves, she mention it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Freedom of expression. There is no issue here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should all get this t-shirt and wear it day in and day out cause
it's the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. I had a prick USMC captain berate me in front of my platoon
Because my dog tag read: religion: "no preference". All I could do was stand there @ the position of attention and listen to his mush brained oratory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You didn't write your senator later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. My son was pressured into
putting down a denomination on his dog tags during boot camp at Parris Island. He couldn't spell Presbyterian...the church he'd been baptised in but we'd rarely attended. So he said Baptist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is a Keeper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. : ) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Policies need to change
Uniformed personnel must be allowed to openly criticize the president and his policies, not to disobey orders, but to criticize political decisions of the Administration without fear of punishment.

If that bothers the Administration and the other civilian nose-picking pussies at the Pentagon then perhaps they should do a better job at running a foreign policy that the troops can heartily support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC