So, the Dems are not going to filibuster
ikojo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:13 PM
Original message |
So, the Dems are not going to filibuster |
|
Roberts? Do they know what an opposition party is and what it does? If they need an example then perhaps they should look at how the Repugnicans treated CLINTON during his TWO administrations.
Wow! To think these people will come whining to us in 2006 and 2008 about how we need to put Republicans with D's after their names in power to undo what the Republicans with R's after their names did.
|
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. that's a reasonable starting position |
|
we want the dems to have at least a shred of credibility don't we?
|
K-W
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Who needs credibility when you irrationally fight everything!!!! |
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
didn't filibuster Clinton Supreme Court nominees.
|
ikojo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. No they were too busy investigating him |
|
for a failed real estate deal and an extra marital affair.
So what the pugs didn't filibuster Clinton's nominations.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
because many here will say the Dems aren't real dems if they don't filibuster. That is why.
|
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
They never scheduled hearings for his nominees. Much quieter, same result.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. we're talking about supreme court nominees |
|
both Ginsburg and Breyer were easily confirmed.
|
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. No, they just never let most of his judicial nominees out of committee |
|
100's of positions went vacant for years!
Just another rose by another name.
|
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. and Dubya's been filling those with Federalist Society hacks ever since |
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. I wasn just addressing the supremes |
|
not all judicial appointments. What they did on the lower courts was reprehensible.
|
immoderate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think it's smart to lay low for now. |
|
And then rip this guy open at the hearings. Bush pulled him out now to distract from the Plame affair. I think Dems should ignore him now and build up ammo and then bring out all the conflicts of interest that he apparently has when he's on the hot seat.
In the meantime let's roust the administration and keep their transgressions in the forefront.
--IMM
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
9. You got it. Since the sorry showing of 2004, I've been asking myself |
|
if it's any longer worth it to vote. And wondering if it ever was
What's that Lily Tomlin quote? "No matter how cynical I get, I can't keep up,"
|
ultraist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
12. How can they filibuster ? |
|
Roberts was unanimously confirmed for his last judicial appointment by those same Dem Senators. At least most of them are still there.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.