|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:44 PM Original message |
So has Bush been questioned yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Both have been interviewed and both have retained private attorneys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, Bush definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. retained private attorneys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. But not sworn testimony, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. From what I remember it was just an interview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Right...not "under oath" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Here's a link: June of 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Thank you for posting this link (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. Anyone remember the term "Un-Indicted Co-Conspirator"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC