Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Secret means the document was TS, but the paragraph was still S secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:45 PM
Original message
Top Secret means the document was TS, but the paragraph was still S secret
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 08:59 PM by jsamuel
From what I understand, and correct me if I am wrong, but the paragraph containing Plame's identity was Secret, not Top Secret.

The reason the entire document was TS was because it had some other paragraph that is considered TS. The document is rated with the highest level of any one paragraph in the document or "various Secret paragraphs became Top Secret when compiled."

Just wanted to clear the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's the difference in top secret and just secret?
I heard several hours earlier on CNN that the page with Plame's identity had "S" at the top and not TS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Top Secret is higher classified than Secret is
However Secret is more classified than Classified.

I am not sue the exact difference between TS and S, but the S at the top of the page is a summary of the highest level paragraph on that page. So that means that no TS information was on the page that had Plame's identity. However, no one should have been looking at the memo without TS autorization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The levels are:
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 08:55 PM by Rufus T. Firefly
Classified, Secret and Top Secret.

If you have classified clearance, you don't have clearance for S and TS. And so on. But technically it's all "classified," which may make for a little confusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information#U.S._Government.27s_Classification_system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. That's not quite right
Classified information includes:

Top Secret
Secret
Confidential
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The difference is the level of damage a leak would cause
Top secret = exceptionally grave damage to the national security
Secret = serious damage to the national security
Confidential = damage to the national security

And the OP is correct. Assuming the paragraph was Secret, but the overall document was Top Secret, there are two possible explanations:

1) other paragraphs were Top Secret, or
2) various Secret paragraphs became Top Secret when compiled. Sometimes classification guides are written that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for #2 there, that is important enough to edit the original post
Thanks :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. What does that mean.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmcatt Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. But wasn't her paragraph "SNF"?
meaning "Secret - Not Foreign", such that it was considered important enough that it couldn't be shared with friendly foreign intelligence agencies.

Even if the entire document was TS simply because of a single (other) TS paragraph, that doesn't detract from the significance of the paragraph about Ms. Plame, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No, it doesn't distract from the importance, I just wanted to make sure we
had our information CORRECT, unlike the people on the other side of the fence.

I am not sure if it was SNF or S. Either way, the document was TS and on a need to know basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. That is the Talking Points from the GOP, it is all spin..
Don't start parsing Phrases. That is how it begins to be Diminished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. huh?
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 09:11 PM by jsamuel
I am interested in the truth, not parsing phrases...

Like I said, it doesn't diminish anything, just don't want to see someone go out on a limb saying Plame's identity is TS and them be proven false on a technicality like Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Correct.
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 09:37 PM by Starfury
The following link will give you more information than you probably ever wanted to know on properly marking sensitive documents. (It's a .mil link, for those who are paranoid...)

http://www.dss.mil/search-dir/training/csg/security/S1class/Marking.htm

In particular, look at the section under "portion marking".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well that makes it "Fair Game"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC