Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At What Point, During Nixon's 2nd Term, Would A SCOTUS Nom. Been Untenable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:06 PM
Original message
At What Point, During Nixon's 2nd Term, Would A SCOTUS Nom. Been Untenable
Was it during the breaking of the story, was it during the Congressional hearings???

Just positing the fact that, AT SOME POINT, nixon could not get away with anything!!!

Let alone getting a Supreme Court Justice through.

Just wondering if we play the Rove\Plame\Libby\Cheney\AF1\... right, we may sit better in a SCOTUS proceeding!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Harry Blackmun was ole number three--the third nominee
May 1969 - Nixon nominated Clement Haynsworth, Jr. which the Senate rejected 55 to 45. Nixon then nominated G. Harrold Carswell who also was rejected by the Senate.

Harry Blackmun - the author of the Roe v. Wade decision was ole number three.

The next old number three was a Reagan appointee - Anthony Kennedy
Reagan nominated Bork, then Ginsberg, then Kennedy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah... But At What Point Was A SC Nominee NOT Gonna Happen ???
When his own party stood up to him... I think!

Could it happen again???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. when Republican senators and reps starting coming out . . .
in favor of impeachment . . . once the leadership of his own party turned against him, he was toast . . .

but those were vastly different times . . . times when a good portion of Republican senators and reps actually had integrity and, when the chips were down, were willing to put aside their own interests and those of the corporate oligarchy and do the right thing for the nation and its people . . .

sadly, that's not the case today . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC