Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big Story in the New york Times!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:47 PM
Original message
Big Story in the New york Times!
The net has been cast far and wide.

For Two Aides in Leak Case, 2nd Issue Rises

http://nytimes.com/2005/07/22/politics/22leak.html?hp&ex=1122004800&en=da4770e9392bb1c6&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. HOLY CRAP! "related underlying issue"
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 09:50 PM by Lex
.

"WASHINGTON, July 21 - At the same time in July 2003 that a C.I.A. operative's identity was exposed, two key White House officials who talked to journalists about the officer were also working closely together on a related underlying issue: whether President Bush was correct in suggesting earlier that year that Iraq had been trying to acquire nuclear materials from Africa.

The two issues had become inextricably linked . . . "




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Does anyone know if Fitzgerald can also investigate whether
the Admin intentionally lied about the Niger-uranium connection?

That is the underlying incident that led to the Plame's name being divulged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. He can if he wants to
His authority is to investigate the Plame leak and that should include all crimes that are related to it. If he wants to he can indict for any crimes he sees and then after indictments are handed up let the bastards fight them on the grounds that he exceeded his authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. This question was asked in a previous thread today; and it was
argued pro and con...I'd love to know the real answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
66. One fact that stays with me is that the judges who have read the
redacted pages of Fitzgerald's case all agree that the charges are substantial, enough so that they override a journalist's right to protect their sources.

I don't think perjury will be the only charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. From what I've read, I agree w/you...but this would still address the
same issue; i.e. the leaking of a covert CIA agent's name, and the consequences of that. If Fitzgerald could address the entire question of intent, then it may well lead to the uncovering of false motivations for the Iraq War, which would have much graver consequences...IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #75
115. I agree
& that's what I'm hoping those blacked-out pages touch upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #66
122. How much longer before the indictments?

I can hardly sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. If he can find
a connection between the administration and the people who forged the Niger yellow cake documents. This appears to involve those caught up in the neocon spy scandal. There are not that many groups who share the same agenda, and have the same ability, as our friends in the Cheney administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
101. he can investigate
but honestly, I don't see where a crime was committed, I don't think the words yellowcake or Niger were ever uttered under oath. And it is not a ciminal act to lie to the public when one is not under oath.

I don't think the State of the Union is considered sworn testimony, after all, it was already admitted that there was a mistake in that speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Forgery
The documents were forgeries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #102
103. sure, but you'd have real trouble making that stick
you'd have to prove that anyone who used the docuemnts in an official capacity knew they were forgeries. And since I don't believe they were ever used in a legal manner, forgery laws wouldn't apply. Nor would fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #103
106. If connected to the same group who outted Plame
there would be some definite charges.

The connection is the only way there would be any charges, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #106
108. how can you tie forgery
to the plame matter? that's incredibly tenuous at best. I could see it as evidence in a RICO case, but not a direct crime in and of itself. Truthfully, it seems likely that the documents were forged outside the United States, by non-US actors who knew what the administration wanted to hear.

if the use of forged documents for any purpose was a crime, Dan Rather would be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #108
113. The two are inextricably linked
Read the arcticle in the original link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #101
107. Lying to Congress. A felony.
Testimony seeking approval of the IWR, 2003 SOTU... take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #107
110. find me a line
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 09:00 AM by northzax
from any one of those speeches that directly references the yellowcake-Niger connection. The administration has already admitted the SOTU was wrong, if that's perjury, Bush would be in jail. I don't believe that SOTU is considered to be 'testimony'. Any other officer testifying to Congress would have to be shown that he/she knew what they were saying was false. Telling information that you believe to be true, that later turns out to be false is not lying to Congress, if you did it in good faith.

It's like I don't think Scott McLellan lied to the press when he said Rove wasn't involved. I think that's what he was told, so he passed it on. The misinformation lies somewhere else.

now, an interesting question would be, if you deliberatly provide false information to someone who then uses it under oath, are you in trouble? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #110
112. You're right about the specific lie in the SOTU. I think there's more...
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 09:11 AM by Brotherjohn
.. blatant lying by admin officials re the IWR, but I don't have the testimony handy (I think some is even still secret).

The WH, in fact, specifically crafted the line of the SOTU to be technically correct, while knowing it had problems. The WP, I think, published a story on this way back... on the back and forth between the WH... now-NSA Hadley, I think... and the CIA.

So it was "technically" accurate (but intentionally misleading).

But I have a hard time believing something in the congressional testimony, by those in positions to know, would not pass muster as perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #101
114. But it's Constitutionally mandated for the Pres to do, so there is a
legal foundation for him to give this information. Lying during that would surely be illegal somehow (but I'm no lawyer).

The other side of that is the Martha Stewart law - until this all comes out, we don't know what questions Fitz has asked of whom, including Cheney and the Chimp. But lying to a Fed prosecutor conducting an investigation certainly got Martha a few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. That means Fitz is after the forged document
Don't you think? The SISME document, that might have originated with the neocons via Chalabi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
82. This is what I've been wondering . . .
that Fitzgerald thinks that the forged document might've emanated from these sleazebags: Rove, Fleisher, Hughes, Libby, etc.

Not that I think they did it personally, but put someone up to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
109. TPM points out that there are 2 likely souces from which Rove & Libby...
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 09:00 AM by Brotherjohn
... could have learned of Plame's covert status (given the fact that both Cooper and Russert have denied that they were the sources of the info, which conflicts with Rove and Libby's accounts).

1) Ari Fleischer, who was allegedly seen reading the memo marking the paragraph re Plame as "S" for "Secret".

2) The fact that the two were working back and forth with Tenet and Hadley on background for the Niger claim, in preparing drafts of Tenet's "fall-on-his-sword" statement.

The second possibility seems to me to give Fitzgerald a direct "IN" to the investigation of false claims about the Niger-Iraq-Uranium.

Although the very fact that the subject is linked at all, I think, gives him the impetus to investigate. As I pointed out in another post here, this particular lie was told to Congress by the administration in both the 2003 SOTU and testimony to garner support for the IWR.

Lying to Congress is a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. and what was our homework assignment today, Mr. Starr?!
<snip>
"In another indication of how wide a net investigators have cast in the case, Karen Hughes, a former top communications aide to Mr. Bush, and Robert Joseph, who was then the National Security Council's weapons proliferation expert, have both told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that they were interviewed by the special prosecutor.

Ms. Hughes is to have her confirmation hearing on Friday on her nomination to lead the State Department's public diplomacy operation. Mr. Joseph was recently confirmed as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security. As part of their confirmation proceedings, both had to fill out a questionnaire listing any legal matters they had become involved in."

Let's hope she gets asked! Several times until she answers - then the trap gets sprung later - because she WILL NOT tell the truth tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup, I noticed
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I sure hope they fry her ass tomorrow
This should be good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. me too
and I don't have to work, so I can watch it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
83. Am I dreaming?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Hughes should not be confirmed until it is determined if she ratted out
a covert CIA agent or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:22 PM
Original message
or lied about knowing who did, or if she was party to conversations
about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
76. Not likely
Most of our Dems in Congress don't have the stomach for that kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is code for 'a source at the WH' >
"Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation."

That is pure Scotty Mac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It sounds like Rove & Libby conspired to make Tenet take the fall
Right? They decided what Tenet should say and made him take one for the team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Holy crap! They are saying Rove was determining national security policy
doing it on political motives - they employed the natl sec apparatus as a campaign tool in the permanent campaign:

"The effort was particularly striking because to an unusual degree, the circle of administration officials involved included those from the White House's political and national security operations, which are often separately run. Both arms were drawn into the effort to defend the administration during the period. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yes, they are.
I think that both Hardball and Countdown (with Wilson!) will be worth watching tomorrow night. I expect there may be a little more then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. If they call Turd Blossom "Bush's Brain"...
What do they call Turd Blossom's "Body?"

Bush.

The whole Monkey House is BUSTED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. That must be why Tenet resigned in the middle of the night.
The guy knew what was coming and got the heck as far away from the scene of the crime as he could, as quickly as possible.

June 2004 timeframe. Poor bastard. He's probably going to still go down with Cheney and Bush and the rest of the treasonous neocon horde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. They made him take the hit.
Everyone knew that was fishy. It was like a mafia hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. ...And you don't bump off a made guy without permission from the Families.
...otherwise there'll be trouble like the fellah Joe Pesci played in that movie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
67. Tenet didn't HAVE to take the hit...
he coulda had some scruples and done the real patriotic thing: told the truth about what was happening.

OTOH, IF he has been actively working to right the wrongs, as we speak,
ie: working covertly with others in the Company to bring the whole house of cards down in order to save America, all is forgiven...

I cannot understand, though, how a Director of the CIA could possibly be intimidated by these thugs, insofar as lying for them and taking the heat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Probably.
But we do know that he called Hadley, and sent two memos that said the Niger business was not anything the CIA could back, because the investigation(s) showed it to be flawed.

This is getting interesting, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Now THESE are interesting times.
Scooter ties straight on through to Sneer. And Sneer helped Pakistan get their nukes in order.

Cheney gave the OK to, in the name of the BFEE:

1. BCCI funding for development of Pakistan Nuke Program
2. Khan Nuc-u-lar Nutwork spread of weapons to N Korea, Iran.
3. Destruction of Plame Brewster-Jennings & Assoc spy network working to control spread of WMD.

Gee. We might live through this madministration yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I want to do a website that is just you and H20Man discussing this
A two-hander blog. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Great idea.
Maybe MSNBC will give the two of us a show. Could we slap republican guests who lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. On my show you can slap them silly
I give you permission to pound them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. Let's take turns!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. You're a pal, Stephanie!
I dunno. I'm all thumbs when it comes to web work.



Still, it would be great to post all the links, articles, evidence, associations, circumstances and guesses connecting these turds to treason. Even better to do so with you, Waterman and the DU crew who give a damn. Heck ya.

Why don't we start with a thread or two discussing Plame, Cheney, Chimpageddon and the rest of their insane and satanic works? Once we get a bunch of resources on one aspect, we move to the next -- whatever historic, current or future conditions require.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
92. SERIOUSLY.
I'd love to see something like a daily blog in which you two summarize and analyze your picks of the top news o' the day from DU.

Even better if it's on a video clip under 15 min. and you're kinda cute.

You could be the Siskel and Ebert of progressive politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #92
99. I'm shaped like Ebert.
With a head that resembles Edna Boil from SCTV...



...except I need a shave.

In all seriousness: Thank you for the kind words. You have no idea how much they are appreciated.

Most important: A hearty, if somewhat belated, welcome to DU, snot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #99
105. I'll have to do
a sit-up to get into shape for any public appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #105
111. It will be a blog
A virtual appearance. This is what we should do with www.traitorgate.com - we just need someone who knows who to build a site - or we could do it on blogspot and just redirect the URL over there. It would be great to see just a dialogue between you two on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #111
118. Thank goodness.
I told my 18-year old son I was anticipating doing a sit-up. He said I should consider doing two crunches -- Nestles and Captain -- which is likely a better plan for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ocean girl Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #111
120. Stephanie - I agree
H20 Man and Octafish are my favorite master teachers.

Maybe we can get them a show on Al Gore's new TV network. Or how about Air America?

Thanks, guys!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #99
121. LoL! thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. I'll help.
I'm not a great graphic designer, but I can manage data well, and I can merge data well. So if you have lots of statements, urls, photos, etc. that need to be organized and plopped in a web format, give me a PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
85. I am hoping that they and MinstrelBoy write a book(s)
The real history of the 20th & early 21st centuries.

History needs to be told accurately, and our guys are the ones to do it. :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
77. Didn't Ari resign about this time, too?
Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
117. Time for Powell to step up and be the John Dean ( but he won't)



Too scared.


But somebody must step up. After the CIA Hearing the horse is out the barn door!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. that's what it sounds like to me, omigod
and there's yellowcake mentioned, the whole state of the union adress, it looks like it's really winding back to the DSM, finally.
yellowcake. woooo hooo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
69. Maybe that is why Tenet
got that medal. Eh? All for a public display and then if he did get the fall taken he couldn't squeal to people they set him up because Bush would just come back and say he was a great public servant and they honored him and all that nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. What the hell is this?
" People who have been briefed on the case discussed the critical time period and the events surrounding it to demonstrate that Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby were not involved in an orchestrated scheme to discredit Mr. Wilson or disclose his the undercover status of his wife, Valerie Wilson, but were intent on clarifying the use of intelligence in the president's address. Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation."

Let me guess, more shit from rove's lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Yes it is - the article has quotes from both sides.
But the reporter just tipped us off to who this one comes from. The clue is, "Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation." What does Scott McClellan say to every single question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Scotty says: "There is an ongoing investigation and the president...
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 10:18 PM by jim3775
doesn't want to prejudice that investigation"


I guarantee you that the quote is from rove's laywer "on background".

Edit:Then again I found this:

"MR. McCLELLAN: Well, and there were preferences expressed by those overseeing the investigation that we refrain from commenting on it while they're continuing to look at -- investigate it."

Maybe I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. sure, maybe it's rove's lawyer - they're all on the same talking points
i'm just saying it's someone from BushCO being quoted, using the talking points. But the article quotes anonymous sources from both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. smells like it's coming from the whitehouse....
"prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ugnmoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Times is a day late and a dollar short on this one
They have already been outscooped by Wa Po and Bloomberg as well as some bloggers. Also, if you read the article closely it is still trying to give credence to Rove and Libby for their alibi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Yep....Doug Jehl one of the reporters is always favoring the WH.
There's always a line or two put in their articlesthat explains away anything damaging to the Bushies. Plus with Miller out of commission they either have to defend her or continue her lies.. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am getting too excited!
Someone told me
It’s all happening at the zoo.

I do believe it,
I do believe it’s true.

It’s a light and tumble journey
From the east side to the park;
Just a fine and fancy ramble
To the zoo.

But you can take the crosstown bus
If it’s raining or it’s cold,
And the animals will love it
If you do.

Somethin’ tells me
It’s all happening at the zoo.

The monkeys stand for honesty,
Giraffes are insincere,
And the elephants are kindly but
They’re dumb.
Orangutans are skeptical
Of changes in their cages,
And the zookeeper is very fond of rum.

Zebras are reactionaries,
Antelopes are missionaries,
Pigeons plot in secrecy,
And hamsters turn on frequently.
What a gas! you gotta come and see
At the zoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. I couldn't find the words. This works for me.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. SO many bombs here! They WROTE Tenet's speech??
Rove driving national security on political grounds??

Wow.

What's lamer than a lame duck?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Yeah! They told Tenet what to say and then they kicked his ass to the curb
Or else he got the hell out of Dodge - wonder which?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. He got out when they wanted him out.
And Powell was likely in the same boat.


Damn, that Three Stooges graphic had it right: Powell was Shemp, the last guy to get slapped, with no one to slap back.




And to think at first I wasn't sure if that was fair to Powell. Alas: too fair, too fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. A sitting duck? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #59
116. LOL. Give the man a cigar. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
68. HA HA--Simon & Garfunkel got it wrong, though--with Chimpy,
monkeys do NOT "stand for honesty"!!! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you, Santa. It's perfect!
Finally got my christmas present: Reporters acting like reporters and reporting.

Halleluia!:toast::toast::toast::toast::toast::toast::toast:
:bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. They interviewed Karen Hughes! That's WHIG.
Oh this is getting soooo-oooo good!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Even Better - It's the NSC!
That's where this all connects back to Bush ;) Bush is the principal chair/client, Rice the advisor, Cheney a prinicpal, Tenet a principal, Rumsfeld a principal, and Powell a principal. One of the above authorized the WHIG of which the Chief of Staff chaired.

Then the underlings got together both political and secrity council to work together to ride out the crisis. Who was the adult supervision from the NSC of WHIG?

This is getting beyond redemption and will be a farce before it is all over. America loses its honor because they fixed intel to make false claims that were covered up by more false claims and then pointed fingers at everyone else. Irony at its finest.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Who was it?
Who was the adult supervision of WHIG? I will guess Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Since they used WH as part of the name,
I believe we are down to three choices:
Bush
Cheney
Rice
Who will step up to the plate and be that NSC adult sponsoring WHIG?

Oh, is this going to get interesting because this places "the conspiracy, obstruction of justice, perjury, traitor Party" squarely at 1600...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. DICK
I will bet you anything. Georgie doesn't have the energy for that kind of work. He's mean enough, but too lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. LOL! Taking that bet would require me to check my brain as luggage.
No way, Darth has definitely been under the weather lately.

It may be the lies are taking a toll on a whole bunch of folks who never even imagined this would happen when they picked Fitzgerald as Special Prosecutor.

:popcorn: Can't wait to look forward to watching the news again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. These TRAITORS are BUSTED!
The same sick fucks who make money off war, too.

Gee. I hope that's not tinfoil hat stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. I almost believe it! Can it be true?
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 10:17 PM by Stephanie

I swear to God, in August 2003 I was in a bar with friends after a show and I was blabbing on and on about Plame and Wilson and Novak and Rove and I actually wagged my finger in their faces and said, I swear to God, "Mark My Words. We will see indictments!" LOL! I am going to call them all up tomorrow. If terraists don't blow up our subway first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. This just feels
like the Nixon era. These aren't the kind of days that are good for an administration hoping to hide their crimes in the shadows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. What name ties Nixon to the present day?
Bush. The same name ties in bunch of other treasons, like:

-- Continuing to arm theNAZIs after Germany declared war on USA

-- Building up the Soviet threat during the Cold War to enrich their corporate masters

-- Killing JFK in order to have a war a go-go in Vietnam.

It's the same family name that turns up time and again: Bush. And you know they're just fronting for other big names.

So these days too seem familiar. For the Bush Transnational Criminal Enterprise, endangering the national security of the United States is just business as usual.

There's one thing different this time, though. Perhaps there are enough good people are in contact to do something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #54
89. Cheney and Rummy were floating around the Nixon WH
The faces haven't even changed, apart from Nixon himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. How so?
I'm too young to know what the feel was back then. Are you referring to the scent of perjury that is in the air?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. Yeah, that and more.
It was a strange time. Even when Nixon's administration was obviously tied to a serious scandal, the vast majority of people thought he'd get through it. (Nixon was a "survivor" -- I don't mean that as a compliment, just an accurate description.) I think other "older" DUers will confirm that Bob Haldeman was a tough SOB, and everybody in Washington DC was intimidated by him. McGovern knew the deal in 1972, but he got less traction with Watergate than Conyers is getting now .... and he was a presidential candidate!

A few people will remember that there were leaks about suspected criminal behavior before "Deep Throat." TIME had a leak about Henry Kissinger's tapings. (Almost definitely Felt.) But they had control ... Nixon was thrashing the US Constitution, much in the manner that Bush is. (Octafish & I discussed Tom Charles Huston a couple weeks ago; he was advocating a "Patriot Act" type of intel agency to be run out of the White House, exactly like Cheney has been setting up.)

So there was a real concern that an Imperial President would destroy the separation of powers then, as today. And those who saw the possibility of Watergate bringing Nixon down almost didn't dare say it out loud for some time. (In Woodward's new book, it's revealed he and Bernstein realized it one day at work: Nixon WILL be impeached! It was so intense, they agreed to never tell anyone they knew what was actually going to happen.)

Then. it seemed to pick up intensity. Nixon attempted to gain control. Believe it or not, he told Gray to "let Watergate hang out" at his confirmation hearings for FBI director! Gray introduced America to a young fellow named John Dean. Once Dean was a public figure, the tide was turned in a way Nixon couldn't control. Dean talked, and everyone turned against everyone!

Dang! I shouldn't ramble on here. But I hope that what I said makes sense .... and I'd recommend reading some of the better books on that era today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
79. Very informative.
Thank you for taking the time to reply in such depth. You outline the parallel feelings quite succinctly.

I just obtained a copy of "Watergate" by Fred Emery, which I'm about to read. I was told it was a good starting point book on the actual evidence and time-line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #79
95. Top notch book!
I just read it a week or two ago. Fantastic book. Do me a favor: read the parts about McCord while considering the possibility that his goal was to bring Nixon down. Emery points out a good dozen "warning signs" that people like Liddy had, but over-looked, because they assumed he was helping them.

Let me know what you think of it. I'd give the book an A+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
80. What do you mean about Kissinger & Felt?
My dad always thought Deep Throat was Kissinger. What Kissinger tapings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #80
94. Between May of 1969
and May of 1970, Kissinger was "in charge" of having a total of 17 White House aides and journalists' phones tapped (and taped)! These events would become some of the most controversial in the whole grand scheme of Watergate. Someone tipped off TIME magazine very early, but this was when the Nixon White House seemed too powerful to take on.

Kissinger was on a lot of people's "short list" for suspects, including those who believed that Deep Throat was a composite. The early leak to TIME certainly would have made it necessary that the character be a composite were Kissinger part of it ..... because those taps were one of the ugliest things that Henry did on the domestic scene.

Henery was one of the people who came to hold Nixon largely in contempt, when the alcohol abuse and mood swings created a very unstable president. He under-cut him in some fairly public ways, in regard to negotiations with North Vietnam. That was in large part because Henry wanted to get full recognition for everything he did, and he saw Nixon as inferior in regard to foreign affairs. He felt he was co-president. All of these would be reasons that your father would have viewed Kissinger as a likely suspect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. Umm WOW!
All I can say is, WOW, the Administration must be shitting it self, it is coming apart on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
46. Libby was working with Rove and Hadley was consulting with Tenet ?
Rove = Bush, Libby = Cheney, and Hadley = Tenet....

The right hand men of the people making the decisions. It appears more and more that Tenet was forced out. The Medal of Freedom was just a cover to make it all look legit. Is it Tenet that is now spilling the beans on all his former friends?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. We know that after
Wilson's article, Tenet tried to take the blame. But it came out that he had called and sent two memos to Hadley, saying the yellow cake claim was weak at best. Hadley appears to be the one who removed the information from fall '02, where Bolton attempted to put it in a State Department paper. However, it was then re-inserted in the State of the Onion speech. Hadley then took responsibility, when it was shown he had the knowledge that the Niger bit was bullshit. Hadley, of course, leads directly to Rice. Full circle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. What is Hadley's position exactly? He is a CIA/WH liaison?
He is Tenet's #2? What's his title?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Hadley was Condi's #1 aide...
Deputy National Security Adviser to the President ... or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. We always kind of thought he might
If they forced him to lie and then forced him out he might take great pleasure in assisting in their undoing. T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. And they say Ari never read the memo ??
But his logs show thatNovak called him the next day after Wilson's article in the NYTimes?? Hadley was consulting with Tenet, they say. So, Hadley was the one passing the information from Rove and Libby. Rove and Libby were getting their info from Bush and Cheney. That seems to be the way the chain of command was working....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. please repeat that - say it for me slowly
I'm still not clear on Hadley - he is Rice's asst?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. He was
her top assistant. He was, in many ways, the person that VP Cheney had to run things behind the scenes. He's an odd fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. On MSNBC just now, they said Ari read the memo on AF 1
It was said during the last part of Hardball with Chris Matthews.
They said Ari was seen reading the memo on AF1.

That was the first I had heard of Ari reading the memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #53
73. you're saying Bush&Cheney passed info to Rove&Libby who passed to Hadley?
Who took it to Tenet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. Hadley = Rice Strictly a WH op.
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 10:44 PM by Pithy Cherub
he was her proxy not Tenet's. The CIA management team started resigning en masse after Tenet's resignation and Goss's appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #46
84. Could this have anything to do with
the change in status of the DCI after Tenet left? Goss would agree to be on the outside, on-call basis, so that the CIA would not have access to maneuverings on this case. Also the big purge of the CIA when Goss took over, shutting out those involved from opportunities to contradict the White House on the "failure of intelligence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #84
98. Yes.
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. Ladies and Gentlemen..
We got him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #60
87. THEM
We got THEM.

Sounds like the net has been cast over the whole dirty bunch of 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
61. Regarding: 'Not Orchestrating' ....
The work done by Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby on the Tenet statement during this intense period has not been previously disclosed. People who have been briefed on the case discussed this critical time period and the events surrounding it to demonstrate that Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby were not involved in an orchestrated scheme to discredit Mr. Wilson or disclose the undercover status of his wife, Valerie Wilson, but were intent on clarifying the use of intelligence in the president's address. Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation.


Frankly this amounts to a 'I didnt steal the twinkies because I was hungry' defense. Their zeal in defending their own false claims forced them to ATTACK the messenger, because they couldnt attack the message.

Wilson was right; they couldnt refute him .... So ? ... like good republicans > They ATTACK ......

They 'orchestrated' an ATTACK on the Wilsons, using the exposure of secret classified information to form their polemic .....

Despicable .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #61
72. Orchestrated an attack=conspiracy; and that is what Fitzgerald
is thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. It's important to remember
to ask who is doing the leaking? Someone attempting to help Fitzgerald? Or someone trying to help their client?

I think that what is coming out may be a feeble attempt to help the Pilsbury Dough Boy of the White House. His attorney has been the most active "undisclosed source" in the entire investigation. I think he may be trying to spread the responsibility to the VP's office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #74
90. Wow. Very interesting theory.
When faced with a laser beam of inevitable scrutiny, refract the beam to allow a wider band of focus on the situation...

Perhaps the attorney is preparing for a way out ala "Look! There's bigger fish to fry!"...

TurdBlossom is such a backstabber and coward, I really wouldn't put this past him at all...

after all, that's what he does best...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
78. Just the beginning...
For ROve and the White House we always knew thier arrogance would be thier undoing...

And this is just the start of the unravelling of the Bush Presidency. The corruption and lies were eventually going to take hold of them and control them...rather than them controlling the lies.

The press is not letting up. The chink in the armour has been found and like the the piece of sytrofoam insulation that ultimately brought the shuttle to disaster so to will a few simple lies uncover the rotten core of Bush and company....a core WE ALWAYS KNEW was there...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Keep on rockin' in the free world!
"The press is not letting up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #78
91. excellent analogy.
rotton to the core...

and when running a crooked infrastructure such as the size they have, sooner or later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
86. My stomach hurts! This is wild!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
88. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #88
93. Thank you all for connecting the dots
It's a brilliant piece of sluething. Now the question is what will happen after these gangsters are jailled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
96. Man, this thread took off after I went to bed!
For everybody who contirbuted!

:thmbsup:

Great analysis, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. A reminder:
Joseph Wilson will be on Countdown tonight on MSNBC. As we watch it, we should keep in mind that Karl, Dick, and Scooter are watching it to. Do you think they will realize they fucked with the wrong guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #97
100. Rove, Libby,. Cheney, and Bush all considered themselves above the law
so of course they misunderestimated (sic) the spooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #100
104. Many, many years ago
I was boxing on an "undercard' in Albany, NY. This was an amateur card. There was a mean and ugly looking guy who was about my size, and I remember saying to my brother that he looked like a tough guy. My brother said naw, he had a scarred face because he wasn't tough, and that he'd be an easy fight. He said it's the guys who don't look tough who surprise you.

The mean and ugly looking guy got flattened by a clean cut looking kid that night. (grin) I always remember that. I don't think guys like Rove or Bush ever got into fights as kids, or young men. So they never learned that little lesson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
119. Is this, at long last, the scandal that WON'T go away?
Please, pretty please, oh Universe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC