Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RANT: Barry Levinson and David Mamet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:26 PM
Original message
RANT: Barry Levinson and David Mamet
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 11:27 PM by Montauk6
First off, three words you don't seem to hear much of: "Wag the Dog"

Yet, I would imagine that the Washington Outfit has given us several vignettes that would qualify for this phrase, thanks to Capo Rove.

Prior to 2000, it was all over the place, you couldn't escape it, the ultimate catchphrase/soundbyte/cliché, courtesy of the rushed, highly overrated political satire of the same name, the timing of which coincided too conveniently with the pseudo (in hindsight) scandal involving President Clinton and Mata Harinsky.

As I'm sure we all know (even those that didn't see it), the film involves the grunt work of a presidential advisor and a Hollywood producer to fake a war in order to distract the nation from a sleazy sex scandal involving the Chief. Now I don't know the exact timeline involving the release of the movie and when the Monica deal hit the headlines but does it really matter???

Allegedly, the film's creators were riffing on the Reagan Administration's weaselling attention from the 200-plus Americans killed by a bomb attack in Beirut by invading the pathetically harmless Grenada (remember them yellow ribbons?). But, HELLOOOO, that was, at the time, over 10 YEARS AGO! Well, I guess better late than never, right?

But, come on, who would've truly made the connection between "Old Shoe" and Grenada? Even if you take off the table the Monica thang, you still have a Prez that the right-wing spin leviathan went overtime in portraying as a lying sleazeball who'd jump on anything with big hair, a hole and a heartbeat. Paula Jones, Troopergate, you know the lyrics.

So, after the movie becomes part of the culture, skip a bit. Terrorist bombings; Clinton orders retaliation in dogged pursuit of one Osama Bin Laden. BUT, because this happened during the Mess on the Dress Mess, the MSM and the machine started taunting, "WAGTHEDOG WAGTHEDOG WAGTHEDOG WAGTHEDOG!!!"

You know, I'm starting to think that maybe Bill should wear the asterisk, since now the common trick is to pull him down in the mud with the snakes by claiming that he shares a LOT of the blame for 9-11 because of his due to his own bungling of the Osama Affair.

But stamp an * there because how do you expect a guy to fully concentrate on popping terror cells while also dealing with preparing for depositions, lawsuits (thanks to the SCOTUS making him open season), (not so) Special Prosecutors turning every little thing into some kind of Gate (from haircuts to leaving the toilet seat up)?

So, skipping further ahead, what happens? Over 3000 wiped in one hellish day, many more destroyed by this pseudo war, REAL scandals plaguing the idiots in charge (the only difference is the woefully dismal lack of enthusiasm in prosecuting).

But, at least, we had "fun" chuckling over how art imitates life (or whatever).

OK... </rant>

So how was your day?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, it amazed me
that the catchphrase got stuck to Clinton. The book the movie based on, American Hero, was an hilarious roman a clef on the Bush administration, rife with footnotes in case you couldn't readily match the fictional events with the real ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC