|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:43 PM Original message |
The Gang of 14 seems to be on board with Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. What is so "maverick" about rubber-stamping the Bush agenda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. maybe they meant mav-wreck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good. Now the press and the Dems can concentrate on Rove/treason and DSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highnooner (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I believe the tactic of outing Roberts now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. If they wanted to distract attention they should have nominated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Explain to me again this logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
5. I had no doubts that this would happen when we backed down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Even without the deal Roberts wouldnt get a filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. This could be a pre-emptive strike from a known Bush-friendly paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The LA Times is Bush friendly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. What is so demeaning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC