Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Gang of 14 seems to be on board with Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:43 PM
Original message
The Gang of 14 seems to be on board with Roberts
"The group of maverick Democrats and Republicans who reached a truce in partisan warfare over judicial nominations this year decided Thursday that President Bush's nomination of John G. Roberts Jr. to the Supreme Court was not "extraordinary" enough to break that peace."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-roberts22jul22,0,6802277.story?coll=la-home-headlines

If they agree, there pretty much ain't nothing that's going to stop this from going through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is so "maverick" about rubber-stamping the Bush agenda?
Gotta love that "Liberal Media."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. maybe they meant mav-wreck?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Now the press and the Dems can concentrate on Rove/treason and DSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highnooner Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I believe the tactic of outing Roberts now
has backfired. There are bigger fish to fry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If they wanted to distract attention they should have nominated
someone much less safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Explain to me again this logic
Rove will either be indicted or he won't be. What can we really do until then? Endlessly debate this for 4 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I had no doubts that this would happen when we backed down
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 03:51 PM by Horse with no Name
Just like the bully that keeps drawing a line in the sand and then daring you to cross it.
When you do, they draw another one and then keep daring you, ad infinitum.
It was all for show. Hope you all enjoyed it.
These asshats never had any integrity to start with--why would anyone think they would have acquired some on the way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Even without the deal Roberts wouldnt get a filibuster.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 03:56 PM by K-W
The Democrats, having little power, would need large scale popular support for a filibuster, that and an indication that the next nominee would be any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. This could be a pre-emptive strike from a known Bush-friendly paper
:puffpiece:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The LA Times is Bush friendly?
I've always felt it made the NY Times look like Newsmax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. What is so demeaning
about this is how the Bush people have blown off this swing vote RINO/DINO "power" bloc until they realized how defanged and pathetic they really were. Until they were needed for show purposes only.

If the Bush people had not been so scared and maniacal in pursuit of the extreme they would have made a lot of valuable use of these people to get everything they wanted smoothly, to the despair of all normal Democrats.

They are really considered mainly a plaything to back off from the blowback of the absolute contempt they have shown everyone not in the Bush inner circle. It must a source of comic relief in the WH to watch these weakest and most idiotic of loyal opposition leaders pose and strut as they wheedle and abet things now going down the toilet faster than Lieberman's presidential aspirations. Even the plain reasons for predestined electoral defeat cannot educate some people.

If the Bush people have tested the true mettle of all Americans they certainly have shone that some people earn contempt in bipartisan fashion
beyond the derision of Mt.Olympus itself. The "moderates" have failed in extreme fashion. They have proved they never were a good "third way" out of the world's mess. Roadkill in suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC