I was wondering if Rove & Company must had ever tried the "Get 'em through their Wives" ruse before.
On August 4, 2003, the Washington Post published an article stating that Powell planned
to step down due to a promise to his wife:"WASHINGTON (Aug. 4) - Secretary of State Colin Powell and his top deputy have told the White House they will not serve a second term if President Bush is re-elected, The Washington Post reported.
But a State Department spokesman vigorously denied the story on Monday.``There's no basis to the story at all,'' said Philip T. Reeker. ``There was no such conversation.''
Citing ``sources familiar with the conversation,'' the paper said in a story for Monday's editions that Powell deputy Richard L. Armitage recently told national security adviser Condoleezza Rice that he and Powell will leave on Jan. 21, 2005, the day after the next presidential inauguration.
"The Post said Powell has indicated to associates that
a promise to his wife, rather than any policy disagreements with others in the administration, is a key factor in his intention to serve only one term."
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/b68802b16ec3eef2?as_umsgid=20030804111558.04816.00001251@mb-m26.aol.com
"The Post said Powell indicated a commitment made to his wife was a key factor in his desire to serve only one term.Rice and Wolfowitz are the leading candidates to replace Powell, The Post said. Rice appeared to have an edge because of her proximity to Bush, it added.
''My gut tells me that he will leave at the end of this term,'' said one official.
The Post story is not helpful to Powell, who could find his effectiveness diminished if he is seen as a lame duck for the remaining 18 months of Bush's current term.
In Crawford, Texas, where Bush is on vacation at his ranch, White House spokesman Scott McClellan attributed the story to the Washington ''rumor mill.''
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.cambodia/browse_thread/thread/22e06bb9a9c30b3f/b65c1356dbd29580?q=powell+ranch+texas+(colin+OR+col%C3%ADn)&rnum=1&hl=en#b65c1356dbd29580
Remember when Powell "resigned" on November 15, 2004? Again, his wife's wishes were given as the reason for his resignation:
"The 67-year-old reportedly
promised his wife he would serve only one term as secretary of state. He said in his resignation letter it was time to return to a private life."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4013621.stm"Powell will leave on Jan. 21, 2005, the day after the next presidential inauguration, sources familiar with the conversation said. Powell has indicated to associates that
a commitment made to his wife, rather than any dismay at the administration's foreign policy, is a key factor in his desire to limit his tenure to one presidential term."
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/jumped_ship.htmlBUT, ACCORDING TO THIS NYT ARTICLE BY Maureen Dowd, THE ENTIRE "STORY" ABOUT POWELL'S WIFE WAS A LIE!!
August 6, 2003
Neocon Coup at the Department d'Etat
By MAUREEN DOWD NY TIMES
Let others fight over whether the war in Iraq was a neocon vigilante action disrupting diplomacy. The neocons have moved on to a vigilante action to occupy diplomacy...
President Bush staged a Texan tableau vivant last night, playing host at his ranch to the secretary of state, his wife, Alma, and his deputy, Richard Armitage. Mr. Bush wanted to show solidarity after a Washington Post story on Monday that said that Colin Powell, under pressure from his wife, said he would not be part of a second Bush term, nor would Mr. Armitage.
Mr. Bush might be trying to signal his respect for Mr. Powell, but the president is not always privy to the start of a grandiose neocon scheme...
Countering the Post story, Mr. Powell's posse claimed that neither the secretary of state nor his deputy had ever said they intended to step down, and charged that the neocons were leaking a canard to turn the two men they consider lame doves into lame ducks."This is the revenge of the neocons for two months of bad news, looking like they're falling all over themselves in Iraq," said a Powell confidant, noting that Alma Powell was furious she had been dragged in.In The Post, nearly all of the names of those who could move up if Mr. Powell moves out are Iraq hawks: Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz and Newt Gingrich were mentioned as candidates for secretary of state; Wolfie, Cheney Chief of Staff Scooter Libby and Condi deputy Steve Hadley, who may be radioactive after the uranium mistake, were mentioned for national security chief.
The move against the popular Powell had all the earmarks of the neocons' pre-emptive strike on Iraq:
2.) Sex-up the intelligence. The leakers spread word that Mr. Armitage told Condi that he and Mr. Powell would leave on Jan. 21, 2005, the day after the next presidential inauguration. "Nonsense," said Mr. Powell. "Nonsense," said Mr. Armitage.
3.) Create a false rationale. Everyone knew the pair might not stay for a second term. But the neocons were impatient to give them a push,
blaming poor Alma Powell for henpecking her husband when they were.So, it looks like the neocons used a lie involving Powell's wife to squeeze Powell out of office. Even his denials couldn't save him.
Secretary of State Colin Powell on Monday dismissed as ''nonsense'' a Washington Post report that he and his deputy Richard Armitage planned to step down in early 2005. ''It's nonsense. I don't know what they are talking about. I serve at the pleasure of the president...''