Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Mary Matalin may have told

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:03 PM
Original message
I think Mary Matalin may have told
what she knows also..been thinking.
When she got the summons to testify, I would think she discussed it with Carville and he would have told her, "tell them what you know, babe".
They have young children and I seriously doubt they would want to see her in jail because of this. I know she's a rabid republican, but just maybe with advise from Jim, her family came first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
This is exactly what my husband and I discussed at dinner yesterday. Family has to come first, even with a rabid type like her.

I never have understood that marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I haven't either, but I'm sure she
would have discussed her predicament with Jim and I really think that's what he would have told her. He's pretty straight forward most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read on DU that carville
said on one of the shows that this traitorgate was nothing..move along.

Paraphasing, but that's the gist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sounds to me he was downplaying it cause he
knew his wife was involved, but that doesn't mean he wasn't worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That may have been an attempt by Carville to protect his wife, but he's...
...wrong about "traitorgate", very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Precisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How is Mary M. involved. Carville was on msnbc today and I have to
say, he was not his usual cut down the Repugs self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Carville is a strategist, not a constitutional scholar
There is no way he and his wife cannot be in cahoots with each other, and Carville seems so different than he used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. What the hell makes anyone here think that Carville is on OUR side?
He works for the Ruling Class, just like his wife. His first loyalty is to POWER -- NEITHER of them are going to endanger their cushy insider lifestyle for mere principles or ethics!

These people are totally engaged in their own little games, it's got NOTHING to do with truth or justice.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Amen, Sistah!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks! I confess, I have NO patience anymore with political naivité. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I wish you'd keep your cynicism to yourself - Yea right
Seriously, i feel the same way as you. We have ourselves a government of the corporation, by the corporation, for the corporation.

No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up.
Lily Tomlin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Sure it's about POWER! But when something might involve
THEIR power, or THEIR own hide, my $$ is that either or both will talk and protect thier own a**es.

Someone asked why is Mary involved. She was on AF1 on the trip to Africa when Ari "supposedly" read the memo labled "Top Secret".

Since she is Cheney's rhight hand, I suspect she heard the reading.

Nobody knows how many people this investigation is going to touch, and posssibly ruin!

I hope it's ALL OF THEM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. well said!
and rarely heard and understood, I'm afraid.

Keep saying it though. Maybe it will sink in to more people as time goes on. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. What is up with Mary Matalin and Andrea Mitchell...Both had to testify...
and I have been SO suspicious of Andrea...I do not trust her and think she is somehow involved in the leaks. Her appearance yesterday in Africa with Rice seemed like a show; a planned diversion, and so ironic that she should screaming charges of lack of freedom of the press, when our free press is probably protecting criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I keep thinking back to when this first broke
K-Street was on HBO at the time (remember George Clooney production, part live, part script?) and Mary looked panicked about it, because they did follow a leak (didn't say Plame, just a leak), but I think she knows how serious it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. okay, I've officially lost it . . .
when I read the headline of this thread, I actually wondered for more than a few seconds what a deaf actress could possibly have told anyone . . .

think it's time to adjust the meds . . . :sigh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Marlee/mary matlin..
Very similiar!

Forget about the meds:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. she is a republican whore
they put the interests of their party above the interests of their COUNTRY - what makes you think their FAMILY would be of real concern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Carville was falling all over himself defending Ms. Hughes
on CNN yesterday afternoon. Oh she would have nothing to due with the leak, I know her so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC