Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqi Women May Lose Basic Rights Under New Constitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:31 PM
Original message
Iraqi Women May Lose Basic Rights Under New Constitution
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0723-06.htm

UNITED NATIONS - The irony is not lost either amongst women's groups in Baghdad or activists in the United States: Iraqi women who enjoyed basic human rights under one of the world's most repressive regimes headed by former President Saddam Hussein are now on the verge of losing their hard-won freedoms under a U.S.-blessed administration in the insurgent-ravaged country.

”We express our deepest concern and worry about the drafts lately released by the (Iraqi) Constitutional Committee, specifically relating to the chapter on duties and rights, in which the (Islamic) sharia law was clearly stated as the main source of legislation in the new Iraqi constitution,” the Iraqi Women's Movement said in an appeal to the United Nations.


I think that the United States should be held accountable for its disregard of the impact on women's rights of the (military) occupation -- something many people said in advance when the Bush administration tried to claim the war would benefit women, and many pointed out that Iraq had some of the best laws and policies regarding women's rights already.

Charlotte Bunch of the U.S.-based Center for Women's Global Leadership
According to this draft, the new Iraqi transitional government acknowledges the equal rights of men and women in all fields -- ”as long as it doesn't contradict with sharia law.”

If implemented, the proposed new laws will restrict women's rights, specifically in matters relating to marriage, divorce and family inheritance. A marriage enjoined by a woman's free will is likely to be made more difficult, and divorces by men relatively easier.

Several key rights that were included in the interim Iraqi constitution are also at risk of being taken out of the new constitution by the drafting committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yay for freedom and democracy!
Except if you have a vagina. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And liberty, don't forget neocon-styled liberty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oy vey.
:cry:
What have we done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. bush frequently points out women and the new freedoms. ta tah!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Apparently Freedom is on the March

Well, Republican-brand freedom anyway.

Anyone know if Promise Keepers is opening affiliates in Itaq ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Burqua is On the March
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rlev1223 Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. From the very beginning...
...it was clear that whatever else happened, at least 50% of Iraqis were going to have far fewer rights under "'democracy" than under Saddam.

It was hypocritical enough for the Bush PR machine to revup indignation about the Taliban's treatment of women as a sort of hot-button insurance policy for support for the Afghan war, but the rapidly evolving theocracy in Iraq puts the US in an even worse position...having to publicly support a regime that is adopting sharia law for a previously highly secularized population. Osama couldn't have picked better enemies than the idiots at the PNAC.

Of course, Bush is probably just jealous...he is doing all he can to create a sort of American sharia as well....one of Karen Hughes's first "goals" is to create more 'inter-faith' communication, probably so we can better learn how they do it.


Ecrasez l'enfame!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC