Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The fact that Robert's children are adopted makes him dead set against

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:52 PM
Original message
The fact that Robert's children are adopted makes him dead set against
abortion. This seems likely to be a very strong personal issue to him and I cannot see him making decisions on a woman's right to choose based on the law but on his own feelings (and that of his wife). Even if his record did not already indicate this, I think this is a very distinct tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not
How the hell can you assume that? This is a silly argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because people who have worked as hard as these did to have
children and do not get pregnant naturally and then adopt are always against abortion because they feel like that baby which did not get here might have been there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. wide net
again, this is silly. We are assuming that people who "adopt" are always against abortion? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If you could do me the favor of not dismissing my opinion as "silly",
not once but twice then we can have this discussion. I find that term sexist and condecending. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Oh please
First of all, it is an attack on the opinion and not you. I'm sure you are a fine person.

You find the opinion "sexist"? Re-read what I wrote, and tell me what could possibly be construed that way (btw I don't know what gender you are and I don't care).

That said, I might as well be consistent. For the third time, that opinion is silly. It is based on no evidence but on preconceptions.

#4: Silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I think there is a point here
to consider. I would suspect that parents who adopt are more likely to be anti-abortion. Makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. HA!
I've rarely met anyone who has adopted who is "anti-abortion". Most adoptive parents I've met are pro-choice.

This is one of the arguments I make to the anti-choice crowd - when you get off your duff and start adopting these kids you insist that women have - then I MIGHT listen to you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unrepuke Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. So, we're all here because we're not all there?
;-) Old joke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Interesting choice of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Bull pucky
Family friends adopted a girl then conceived 2 on their own. Through the usual circumstances growing up, one of them eventually got in trouble and needed to be taken to another state for an abortion as a teen. (this was back in the old days and is admittedly anecdotal but my point is folks who adopt aren't any more likely to be against abortion or not - anybody with compassion for a girl or woman's life would favor safe legal abortion, only controlling busybodies - who usually have NO interest in those fetuses once they're born - are in favor of returning to the days of dead poor women and "free choice" for the rich only.

Making abortion illegal stops NOTHING except women's lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Wouldn't the opposite be more likely?
The fact that they adopted means they are likely pro-choice because Anti-Choicers "Love the Fetus but Hate the Child."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. ummmmmmm.........
I don't think you can make that generalization. I adopted and I'm pro-choice.

I think they're just very anti-abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. That might be true in his case, but it's hardly true of everyone who
adopts. I mean, just thinking of the people I know who've adopted.

I'd pay more attention to what he's said on the subject, and that's revealing enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's a right wing wet dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm non-compromisingly pro-choice and I'm a huge supporter of adoption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Those are 2 different things. I am the same as you. I am talking about
people who go through the life experience they went through to have children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I went through those things
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 01:03 PM by Solly Mack
and am in the process of adopting. I tried for years.

I remain pro-choice.


While I do know of people who have turned bitter and ugly because of that experience, it just isn't true of all of us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. You, however, are a liberal and a strong believer in choice in most
things, I would bet. Which is why you will be a great parent. (Good luck, by the way.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree that it could be part of his reasoning for being anti-choice
it's very possible.


but I don't know what his personal reasons are for being anti-choice....can't say that I care what they are either. :)

He's against choice and that says it all to me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Well, you are closer to this than I. I do agree that the reason does not
matter for his being anti-choice. It could be something else entirely but I bet this experience had a great deal to do with it and not just the usual male dominance thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Of course it could be they have trouble conceiving themselves
That isn't unheard of, you know. Don't build a damning case against the guy because there are two children who now have a family who might not ever have had one otherwise.

We'll look real strong knocking Roberts for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. because he shoots blanks?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I find it interesting that they adopted 2 perfect little white replicas of
themselves. Where are the babies that actually needed them, not these 2 specimen who would be fought over anywhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. So these 2 white babies should have been raised by wolves?
How many of the "needy" have you adopted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Here is the difference I believe STRONGLY in abortions rights.
Go to any newspaper and you will see hundreds of ads for white children. Very few if any for special needs, children of color, etc. I worked for years with families in need and saw the devastation, crime, neglect, torture, that happened in families where children were not wanted and this was in a time when abortion was legal. Most of these children were brought into this world because of male dominance in the family and church dictates. Wonder what will happen when the rw gets it way and even more children are born when they are not wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. Perhaps people who sit in front of computers and complain
will have to get off their hypocritical asses and practice what they preach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Thank you!!! God, this whole thing is making me absolutely fucking sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Why did he have to go out of the country
to find those that would fit his view of 'proper'?

And did they adopt or did they buy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. exactly----
what I've been thinking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. I am sure the children ( rememeber them?) don't ask such stupid questions.
Again.....how many of the "needy" children have you adopted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. None. I am not eligible due to my health.
However, I do work with mentoring programs, Girl Scouts, and other enrichment programs here in the shelter for abused, abandoned and foster children so I suppose I have come into contact with several thousand over the last 35 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. I would like to think we can all agree
that whether or not Roberts will make a horrifying Supreme Court justice, it's commendable that his family chose to provide a home for children that needed one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. His wife chose to have a career first
By the time she chose motherhood she was already in her forties. That's something the left has always wanted women to be able to do without stigma. By the times she was ready for motherhood, adoption was the best option available. I think they made a wonderful choice and I hope objections to Roberts as a nominee don't get ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Get ugly as in we think his personal politics and opinions do matter
and should be discussed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. If we discuss his personal opinions we should know something
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 01:38 PM by creeksneakers2
about them and not just decide he has the opinions we expect him to have. Mrs. Roberts is far more complex. She's a feminist. The focus of her pro life efforts have been on creating alternatives for women facing unwanted pregnancies. That's something the left has supported too, as it offers women more, not fewer, choices.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/23/politics/politicsspecial1/23jane.html?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. So is that "getting" ugly. His wife is not a feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. She IS NOT a feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. And by your logic, women who have abortions are dead set against children
This is a nowhere argument.

He and his wife adopted children because they had fertility problems, and could not have their own.

It has nothing whatsoever to do with his views on abortion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Know How To Do it Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'd say Roberts is more pro - "Village of the Damned."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I have seen you ref this in several threads...
I don't understand. Can you explain your allusion? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Know How To Do it Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Sure Man. But I only said this in two threads. It's a 60's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Thanks!
I do remember it...it was a book too, I believe...read it when I was a wee thing...boy, that was a long time ago!

I'll have to put it on my re-read list. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. I don't agree... My parents adopted 19 kids and they're staunch Democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. I was adopted. My republican parents and I are/were pro-choice.
My republican sister is pro-choice as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. All my siblings are staunch Democrats!!! All 21 of us + my parents=23
We all staunch Democrats!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. Anybody Bush picks will have one goal.....
Killing Roe v Wade. Don't fool yourselves into thinking otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. This is just plain bigotry
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 03:20 PM by dsc
nothing more and nothing less. Replace childless, which is really what you are saying here, with say Asian or Jew or African American, and you would be called the bigot you are being. Imparting beliefs and not only that but bitter motives for those beliefs based on nothing more than the fact they are evidently incapable of having children is no less bigotted than the oponents of Justice Marshall who felt he was not qualified due to being black. Shame on you.

On edit One of my favorit aunts, actually my mother's aunt, was childless due to some medical condition and it was amazing the idiotic things that were said about and to her. Of course, this is while I was growing up in a small town in the unenlightened 60's and 70's. I had hoped that crap died out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. If his views on abortion and adoption were connected then
wouldn't they have adopted without going through years of infertility treatment first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. I know people who are desperate for children.
Both male and female, and they are strongly anti-abortion. And their "Pro-life" stance stems only from their mindset that pregnancy is the most sacred thing in the world, since it is something they can't obtain. They're obsessed with having children, so it's unthinkable to them someone would terminate a pregnancy.

I totally agree with you. That type won't be able to check their personal emotional issues at the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC