Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When the White House refuses to release the papers this means

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 05:56 PM
Original message
Poll question: When the White House refuses to release the papers this means
Once again information is requested from the White House about SCOTUS nominee John Roberts and as reliable as the atomic clock, the White House refuses to release the documents. When you hear that the White House refuses to assist by releasing information needed by the senate to make informed decisions what does this mean to you?


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050724/ap_on_go_su_co/roberts_records_4

White House Won't Show All Roberts Papers

By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jul 24, 1:42 PM ET

WASHINGTON - Citing privacy and precedent, the Bush administration indicated Sunday it does not intend to release all memos and other documents written by Supreme Court nominee John Roberts when he worked for two Republican presidents.

The leading Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will conduct hearings on Roberts' nomination, disputed the assertion that privacy was at stake and called such a position a "red herring."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. This means they simply have something to hide??? --what else??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Yep. Careless scrubbing.
Probably relied on "guest workers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Duh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Damn, I've never seen everyone agree with me ever
this is a first - til some freeper shows up and ruins it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Dubya REALLY wants to "bring this country together",
he could start by nominating candidates about whom he has NOTHING to hide.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. These polls just keep getting easier and easier. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But Bush is crooked - he has much to hide!!!...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But this time it's not him he's protecting but Ronald Reagan
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other, if I may:
The White House is obfuscating by refusing to release documents as a matter of course, claiming that the White House is the final arbiter of what can be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Those criminals need to know in no uncertain terms, they
work for us, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is possible to read to much into this
This is politics on both sides. We are demanding the papers because we know they won't want to give them - unless I've missed something, people haven't made specific accusations against him. We want the papers so we can "go fishing" and find bad stuff about Mr. Blank.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's our job right now.
Anything less is the so-called "rubber stamp."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. this administration has more hidden documents
Another Bolton Nomination-Sorry Senators can't see this information...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. quite obviously they have something they don't want you to know!
what else??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Other.
President Bush has already warned us that the terrorists are cold-blooded. They could shoot an innocent person in cold blood, and feel no guilt. President Bush is simply protecting us, by hiding papers/records on this court nominee and everything else, because of the cold-blooded threat of the terrorists. You aren't privy to all the secrets he is. Trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC