Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Electing supreme court judges for life is just plain stupid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 04:57 AM
Original message
Electing supreme court judges for life is just plain stupid
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 05:07 AM by mopaul
we should put term limits on it like everything else. i don't want john roberts to be selected and then live a long happy republican asshole life leaving us all fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. But that's how they made that branch of the government independent
or thought they did.

It would have worked if it hadn't turned out to be so political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a complete list with how long each served
Most actually did not serve all that long, and a few served many years..

What I would like to see id this:

No one younger than 60..assuming that a person by age 60 would have had time to amass a paper trail that could be adequately studied...and preferably would have been a judge already so there would be cases judged to look at

One term of 10 years, and at the end of 10 years..a re-confirmation for ONE additional term of 10...20 years is plenty for any judge

Nine justices...3 women.. 3 minority..3 men.(minority could be male/female/klingon


People live longer these days, and allowing very 'young' and virtually unknown (to the public) judges to get in at 50 or less, sets up a slant that can do harm for 2 generations






http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. if bush appointed him, he's an asshole
and the plan seems to be to keep him there even past his death in 52 years.

it seem to stupid me that if a president determined to be a maniac and a treasonous bastard, was impeached for war crimes and such, his official appointments and laws should be null and void.

in other words, if a supreme court judge turns out to be a psychopathic born again maniac, that's just too bad, you're stuck with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think some job qualifications to be met would be quite reasonable.
I think they should have to serve a certain amount of time as a judge. That would create a paper trail and eliminate the pig in a poke system that Bush is racking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nope. Bad idea.
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 06:35 AM by bowens43
The reasoning behind life time appointments (they're not elected) is sound. Once appointed , they no longer serve at the mercy of the administration that appointed them. O'Conner and Souter are excellent examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC