Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Roberts for the SC? I think the answer is simple.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 06:53 PM
Original message
Why Roberts for the SC? I think the answer is simple.
For the Bushies at this juncture, there is only one bottom-line litmus test: Loyalty to the Emperor. All the other issues--Roe, torture, etc. matter only insofar as they will make it easier or harder to get the nomination through. The fact is, years ago Roberts stuck his head through the same noose that the BFEE is wearing. He helped the Bush putsch in 2001 and stands ready to do whatever he needs to to keep his owners' figurehead on the throne.

Look for another one just like him to replace Renchley. (That's what Nixon used to call Rehnquist because he could never remember his name.) The Bushies need a stacked court to maintain their ultimate grip on power when things start going funny and they need to do tricky things like squelching the Rove hunt with bogus legalisms from the SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Up the flagpole just once, little thread
before letting you sink into merciful oblivion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the plan had been
to go with Gonzales. But recent events have unfolded in a way that they did not want senators -- including John Kerry -- to ask him about that silly little twelve hour gap that's of such interest to Fitzgerald. Some are comparing it to the 18 1/2 minute gap on the old Nixon tape.

After Gonzales, there was a need for a "safe" secong choice. That meant the loyalty factor, plus membership to a little club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Think Watergate Tapes SC decision...
and realize that RoveGate will probably have many such decisions before all is said and done...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great hypothesis, JR!
This is payback for Coup 2000...NO doubt about it!

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ...And, as junk points out, they want a "safe" court
that will continue to do the moral equivalent of Bush v. Gore when necessary to keep the junta in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another thing too -
Roberts is being marketed in the typical Bushco way - style over substance. He has little record to examine, so the focus is on his personality. They keep gushing about what a nice guy he is. Does that sound like anyone else we know? Remember the line - "someone I'd like to have a beer with"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC