Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Clarke's (yes, that Clarke) first novel to be purchased for film

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:21 PM
Original message
Richard Clarke's (yes, that Clarke) first novel to be purchased for film
by Sony Pictures. Even before it's released in bookstores! Get a load of that plot!

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/film/brief_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000991606

Clarke novel at Sony gate

Sony Pictures is negotiating to acquire film rights to counter-terrorism expert Richard Clarke's first novel, "The Scorpion Gate," which Putnam Adult will publish in October. John Calley will produce the project, which the studio hopes will become the first in a series of John Clancy-style political thrillers. The realistic geopolitical thriller is set five years in the future as oil-hungry forces in Washington are ready to reshape the map of the Middle East to further their own ends by launching a global nuclear war. The plot involves a fictional takeover of the House of Saud by extremists. (Anne Thompson)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'five years' -- I think they mean 'five weeks in the future'.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 5 years ago is more apt isnt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for his pocket book...
...but am sure this will be used against him by wingnuts trying to discredit any real world analysis of his they don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well, the GOP slimed him so badly he'll never be able to get another govt.
position, so he has to do something to make some money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have wondered why he doesn't come
out and say something about the VP Affair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Evening kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. love it -- poetic justice?? probably
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Get outta here!
And I thought "Against All Enemies" was his first. Good deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "Against All Enemies" wasn't a novel. At least I hope it wasn't.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 09:36 PM by NYCGirl
Edited to add: Although all the critics thought that his first couple of chapters read like a suspense novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. exactly....that's how I describe the first chapter to anybody I tell about
the book

I still can't figure out how he changed his story about the FBI and their allowing the Saudi royal family out of the country, though

his/Michael Moore-Craig Unger's stories don't jive, and I went back to the book to see what the deal was.

IIRC his story in the book vs. what he's said lately do NOT agree

anybody here recall that?

M. Moore used to have something on his site, dealing with the brouhaha caused by that creep Isikoff's Newsweek BS about it, which showed Isikoff to be the administration stooge he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I read that book and I think Clarke is terrific.
I can't remember anymore specific details other than it was clear he thought Bush was a horse's ass on a number of counts and that to Bush, terror attacks were a backburner issue. (my apology to horses)

This new book sounds like he is once again exposing Bush... just in thinly veiled fiction form

PS I like Isikoff too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. what do you like about Isikoff? his being one of those MOST
resonsible for the impeachment process to get rolling?

you do know his role, don't you?

his impassioned defense of Judith Miller's "journalistic" integrity?

his being caught in a web of lies about the Saudi family?

that Isikoff?

just curious....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. He is a good investigative reporter.
There was some issue recently, like the last 6 months) where the WH wanted Newsweek to apologize and about 3 weeks later it was all true. Damned(!!!!!) if I can think of what it was.

His personal views on J. Miller, bah, I don't care what he thinks, just on his tracking of a story.

I don't know what particulars you are referencing on the Saud family, was it recent or not.

As to clinton, there were so many stories on his womanizing for so many years, I wouldn't credit or discredit one particular reporter. The right was trying to get him for years on this or anything else and they finally succeeded. I don't know his role in it as Idon't know any other reporter on that story...every reporter in the country was doing it, every newspaper, etc., it seemed to me at the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds very interesting
Way to go Clarke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. cast of characters:
a cowardly, dim-witted puppet president?

conniving, manipulative, craven vice president and his conniving, manipulative, craven wife

feckless, powerless, uninformed CIA head

feckless, powerless Sec of State

mendacious, in-over-her-head NSC head, hopelessly in love with Pres. Dumbass

mendacious Megalo DOD chief, found to have long-lasting ties to ME potentates

etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Blurb Posted Here Struck Me As White Knuckle Material...
what with the words 'nuclear war' and all...

Daddy, I'm scared. Make the bad men stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC