Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you diggin on the new WaPo Traitorgate story in LBN?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:16 AM
Original message
Are you diggin on the new WaPo Traitorgate story in LBN?
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 12:16 AM by Goldmund
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's coming dangerously close to the very top
which means GOP congress will do all they can to impeach... Fitzgerald. After all, this is so minor compared to a stain on Monica's dress. Watch Starr talking for the rest of the week and beyond about prosecutorial excesses -- on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Traitorgate is still going on? *sarcasm*
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 12:33 AM by darkism
From cable "news," you'd think it was all Aruba girl and John Roberts.

Good to see that Fitz is still on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. watergate never would have ended the way it did without Alexander
Butterfield

without the tapes, Nixon would have made it through his term before the media/courts caught up with him

unless something similar happens here, I'm afraid they're going to skate, just as they have past EVERY SINGLE other treasonous act they've committed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am now that you clued me in!
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is very strange
At the top of page 2:


In a strange twist in the investigation, the grand jury -- acting on a tip from Wilson -- has questioned a person who approached Novak on Pennsylvania Avenue on July 8, 2003, six days before his column appeared in The Post and other publications, Wilson said in an interview. The person, whom Wilson declined to identify to The Post, asked Novak about the "yellow cake" uranium matter and then about Wilson, Wilson said. He first revealed that conversation in a book he wrote last year. In the book, he said that he tried to reach Novak on July 8, and that they finally connected on July 10. In that conversation, Wilson said that he did not confirm his wife worked for the CIA but that Novak told him he had obtained the information from a "CIA source."


Somebody explain this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, I am
Every new story raises this scandal higher to W and Cheney, and it's going to reach critical mass very, very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Someone's Setting A Trap
Remember, the clock's still ticking here. Fitzgerald is still in the investigation stage...and I'll bet he's getting some interesting feedback from his investigation. Hopefull his people are scowering the papers and websites for all the distortions and lies. They will come in helpful later.

Yep...the can has been kicked further down the road and there's gotta be more brownstaining going in in the Department of Crashcart. That AF1 memo is gonna turn into one hell of a smoking gun here.

Yep...I'm starting to really believe my hopes for a conspiracy or obstruction charge is getting closer to occuring.

Now what????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Does anyone know when the Statute of Limitations runs out for some of the
possible crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Thought It Was 7 Years
except for murder.

Don't worry about that clock running out here, yet. While we'll never get this regime for all its crimes, let's start with just one. Could be we're on the way.

I keep hoping the UN would get its head out of the sand and start looking at this invasion from the international law standpoint. Since 2003 there have been incredible attrocities inflicted upon innocent people. Who did it? Why? Calling the Hauge...wrap up the Milosevich work there's a bigger case in Washington that needs your attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I read some where the times up in November for Fitzgerald's
investigation. We know he will never be able to get an extension, so for all intents and purposes the Statute of Limitations runs out when Fitzgerald's clock runs out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not so - this grand jury has been extended before..... n/t
From a random newspaper article from 6/28/05:

It is unclear how long the two reporters would be detained because of secrecy surrounding grand jury proceedings. Hogan originally ordered the reporters to spend 18 months in jail or the remainder of the grand jury session, whichever was less. The grand jury session ended in May, according to sources, but was extended. The reporters would presumably have to serve whatever time is left in the extended session -- as little as a single month but perhaps much longer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062700489.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Interesting
Could be it got extended because Miller/Cooper's appeals were still pending.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. I sure am. Thanks for sharing. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. No wonder they're going after Fitzgerald
He's on to something they want kept out of sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC