http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2005/07/27/conventional_over_there_holds_its_fire/Sure, it has the visceral intensity of every combat opera since ''Apocalypse Now" -- the battle anarchy, the numbed-out kids losing their religion, the horror, the horror. And it's filled with hauntingly hallucinogenic visual poetry -- an electric-peach sunset across a torn land, white smoke twisting through ruins. It gives us the indelible image of a pair of legs still running after their torso's been blown off.
But the series, which premieres tonight at 10, is a surprisingly conventional war story in praise of Americans fighting on foreign soil, broken but unbowed. The title of the show, which reaches back to World War I and the Yankee Doodle innocence of George M. Cohan, carries little irony here. Despite its edgy stylings, ''Over There" is a straight, well-made homage to our boys and girls in Iraq -- the duty-bound young mother, for instance, and the newly injured hero longing to return to his post. It portrays very few of this particular war's moral and political twists, even while it strongly captures a general sense of band-of-brothers bravery and battle suspense.
And that's too bad. ''Over There" is the only TV series about an American war to air during that war. As such, it's a missed opportunity to dislodge some of the issues about this fight while they're still incendiary. It doesn't need to be a political screed on one side or the other to fold in psychic elements specific to this conflict.
----------
I won't watch this show, it ain't my thing, and i think it's fucking bizarre besides, and sickly surreal. it makes the whole bloody atrocity look like an entertainment, which i find vulgar and sad.
and that title: "Over There" which harkens to bush's famous lie, 'we're fighting them OVER THERE so we don't have to fight them over here'. it also harkens to the world war one song, 'over there', which makes us long for the good ol' days when we had wars for specific reasons.