Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are lefties suddenly squabbling over Jane Fonda?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:53 AM
Original message
Why are lefties suddenly squabbling over Jane Fonda?
Why are lefties squabbling, in other words, over a phony issue manufactured by right-wingers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. we are not squabbling!
are so
are not
are too
huh uh!!!!!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I disagree!
Wait....:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Democrats don't hush their women" as pointed out by a caller to Springer
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 11:03 AM by mtnester
on this topic....

I agree with the caller.

(On edit - although some of them right now seem to think it will be OK to give away some of our rights.....may as well continue pointing out the DLC agenda wherever I can. Flame away if you like, it won't be the last time today and I am wearing my rhinoceros skin as well)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. She ain't my woman. She's her own woman. Nobody has her, she is not owned.
She can make whatever noise she wants. It's nobody's business to tell or force her to do anything. (your caller's wording is very interesting... if not 1950s-centric...)

I won't tell her to hush, but I sure as hell will vocalize my opposition of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. You exactly have that right
just as she does...no finger pointing by me, you and I see eye to eye on individual's rights to speak their minds.

I took it to mean the caller was referring to the way the Repubs "handle" their women folk (no offense to womenfolk, being as I am part of that group)

I know we don't do that, but I have sure seen some quite a few folks here in the past day or two trying (not referring to yourself)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just becasue she's back in the news. No other reason. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. She'll always be Barbarella to me.*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another WMD
Weapon of Mass Distraction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. The momentum to end this travesty of an invasion
has not gotten to the point where all anti-war factions unite for the common cause of ending the conflagration.

It took almost a decade for that to happen during the last imperialistic misadventure.

I predict that after faux troop 'withdrawals' before the 2006 elections and the subsequent troop increases, and when American deaths reach 5,000 or so, we will either welcome ALL parties of whatever stripe in aid of ending this clusterfuck to the cause, or it will be a permanent Gaza Strip situation....particularly with the PNACization of the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. I am sorry but
Jane Fonda had herself photographed with the ENEMY.We have images in our heads and hearts of her laughing so prettily with the enemy.The photo has appeared more and more lately.Who do you suppose is parading that picture?
Jane has said that she is ashamed of it and has apologized.Thank you Jane.
Many Vietnam Veterans will not forgive her and why should they?ANY Vietnam Veteran can say what he pleases.....he fought for everyones right to do so no less so for himself!
I believe that if she were truly sorry for her actions she would "bow out".For the memory of those that died and for the tortured memories of those that lived and DO despise her.
Iraq War Hawks could not ask for a better "poster-has-been" than Jane Fonda.
She is a megalomaniac.With all her money she could be doing much much more than parading a name that she herself tainted.
BOW OUT......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Jane Fonda did not take us to war in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. No Vietnam vet fought for free speech
Sorry to bust your little dream, but that's the reality. Look up on what Diem and later South Vietnamese Governments did. Look up on what the US government did (SDS, Kent State). Free speech was never being fought for in Vietnam, nor so in almost any other conflict.

She was photographed with the "enemy"? Who made them our "enemy"? The US Government did, for no reason, and it cost 50,000+ Americans their lives. She has no need to apologize for opposing such a sick cause, and her picture on an AA Gun really doesn't change my opinion. Why should it?

She risked her career to speak out against what was wrong, and you dare call her greedy? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Many whacked off thinking about Barbarella!
Therein lies the crux of their contradiction!

Jane Fonda also made a movie in which a Viet Nam vet returns, can't remember the rest of the shit, but that right there should have ended the critique. But the fundies need to be exposed for being holier than thou. If they cannot forgive her, does that make them better than God?

And if Jane was a traitor what about Standard Oil and its sacred deal with the Nazis? Why do they get a free pass with the veterans.

Last time I checked Nazis killed our troops. Jane only gave them an erection!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Please
I never used the word greedy.Risked her career...you can sell that down the road. I work with Vietnam Vets who do not like her and it is for them that I say she should bow out... respect them if she is truly sorry.SHE felt that she should apologize but you don't? And soldiers who went to Vietnam were defending our constitutional rights...we were fighting the spread of communism remember...cold war....hocus pocus.The last time I looked that included free speech.Do you really think that the politics of the war were known to 19 and 20 year olds as the signed up or got yanked from school?Iraq Hawks will make minced meat out of her and in so doing will not be good for the cause...in case you haven't noticed ...people don't like her.She is not a good person to be out front on this issue. Why is she doing this?Has she advanced any good cause in the last 30 years of her ultra privileged life?.(oops forgot those flat tummies).Once a diva always a diva.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. give it up...that war, like this one
had nothing to do with "our constitutional rights" and the vietnam vets i know would be the first ones to say that. and yes, young men and women were duped then, as they were duped this time about iraq.
those same "people" who don't like her also don't like:
bill clinton, al gore and john kerry, or liberals and democrats, in general.
you should really do some research on fonda...before you malign her. from what i've read, she been very generous in sharing her wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. You are generalizing. I hate her for embracing the enemy...
and saying our POWs were being treated humanely. She enabled and abetted their torture in doing so. When they came home and collaborated each other's stories she called them liars and hypocrites. She apologised years later only because we were interfering with the shooting of one of her movies. Fuck her and the bus she rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. ok
hate away. i'm certain she won't lose any sleep over it. and no vietnamese person was ever MY enemy, just as no iraqi person is MY enemy. it's unfortunate that americans still haven't learned that people aren't just going to let them take their country from them without fighting back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. The North VietNamese were shooting at me, my fellow troops...
and my South VietNamese friends. That made them my enemy. The VC in country were comparable to most of the Iraqi "insurgents." Believe me, anyone shooting at you becomes the enemy. jane fonda gave aid and comfort to them, her fellow communists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. i understand your feelings
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 02:40 PM by noiretblu
however, people aren't just going to allow YOU to shoot them either, especially if they believe you are an invader. what would suggest iraqis do? allow themselves to be killed so halliburton and becthel can make a ton of money? i mean really...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. The only reason I mentioned Iraq was comparing the wars.
It does not apply to jane. There was an elected government in Saigon being attacked by her North VietNamese friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. She has grown up, admitted her mistakes, and is doing it differently this
time.

What's the big deal?

The 'Iraq War Hawks' you refer to will slam the peace movement no matter who the representatives are. I say screw 'em.

If Jane can help mobilize people, more power to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Remember Richard Nixon? Lyndon Johnson?
Jane did some stupid stuff. Nixon and Johnson carefully built a high-profit war that crippled America's economy for a decade, killed 50,000 of its troops, and killed another two million indochinese, most of whom were non-combatants.

How is it that Jane Fonda is the only one people are angry with?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Kissinger
...Remember they tried to make Kissinger head of the 9/11 investigation and people... me and many others went crazy because we hate what he did during Vietnam and will not forget.He was appointed and un appointed very quickly.There was an uproar!.She is not the only person that some dislike.I hate Kissinger.I feel badly for Jane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. OMFG!
I can't believe I forgot Henry Kissinger.

Jane Fonda would have a difficult time indeed matching Kissinger for spilled blood.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. At least she went to Viet Nam, unlike our chickenshit pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. Rumsfeld was photographed with Hussein.
Cheney illegally did business with him. Let's talk about that.

Fonda has apologized, it was foolish.

The Neo-Cons will never apologize for their well planned "foolishness". And the Neo-cons were/are much older than Fonda was when she made her mistake.

Frickin' move on to something that matters NOW, fer cry-eye.

Quit nursing pain that's done, be a man, or woman. Please grow a little larger within yourself about the issue.

Absolutely horrible things are happening NOW. Thousands are dying. And thousands are on their way out, none of us is safe from the foolishness of this administration.

It is no mistake that the crackpot right keeps throwing this up in our faces, they've done damage a million-fold with their foolishness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because we suffer from
"What will they think about us" syndrome. The left needs to stop worrying about what republicans say about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. she's going on a US tour to oppose the war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. She is a self-serving sycophant. And recently she did something incredible
She praised Pickles and thought * would be a great guy if she spoke with him. :wtf:

If she has a point she should also realize that * of all people surely would not give her the very time of day. NOBODY on the repuke side likes her, especially since narking on our troops in Vietnam which in turn put out troops into a very nasty position. The war was wrong, yes. Her direct actions were just as despicable.

Personally, she seems to be a pot-stirring attention whore. Her Vietnam stunt must be the highlight of her career but the pro-* flip-flopping from a couple months ago is also a shock stunt.

She's also an actress. Never forget that. Any actress getting into politics is there for the attention and ego masturbation. Nothing more. The same can be said for ALL the others: Ventura, schwazenegger, reagan, and the rest. Self-serving sycophants. Nothing more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You forgot something
She's very pro-Linux.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Okay, then I will choose to nitpick:
I dislike her narking in the Vietnam war that got our troops needlessly further tortured.

I dislike her turnabout pro-* attitude from a few months back.

Thespianism and politics do not go hand in hand and she ranks p there with reagan, schwarzenegger, ventura, and the others.

And she loves Linux. Great. Does she love the concept behind it (which is socialism-centric) or how big corporations have taken Linux, repackaged it, and sell it for humongous amounts of money (thereby stealing from all the people volunteering to write the code in the first place)? I'm sure other people who dislike or outright hate her will do a 180 just because of that alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Ventura was an athlete not a thespian
and scyophants? Who was Fonda being a sycophant for? LBJ? SDS? And who would she be doing it for now? BFEE? Move-on?

Egomaniacs probably, but sycophant does not seem like the right word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
49. Her tour is also going to bring about an uncountable number
of needless vegetable deaths, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. A she just wrote a book that needs some buyers

Don't get me wrong, this war needs to end , but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. distraction, distraction, distraction...
Like Barbra, Jane is always good 4 riling up the neoconpoops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Because we've got more than lefties here.
;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Bow + Arrow + Target **twang**>>---> **zip**>>-->**thunk** Center Shot!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. WE are not squabbling over her.
Just others stirring up stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I was wondering the same thing. Here's an idea:
Let's focus our ire on Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
21. Word.
I don't think they realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Because she was the original Swiftboat smear artist and discredits any
cause she publicly embraces.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. Surely, you jest. Jane Fonda stands for everything the Swifites don't.
Discredits any cause she embraces? Not to me, and a whole bunch of other anti-war folks who remember her courage during the Vietnam genocide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. Because we love to paint targets on our feet, and then shoot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. It is interesting, but I think if she's this divisive at DU,
Imagine what her bus tour could do. I am glad she is willing to speak out against this war. I support her right to do so. I just think a national bus tour with Fonda as headliner is ill advised. To me, that would be like Michael Jackson touring as a child advocate. Jackson has not been proven guilty of anything but weirdness but I doubt he'd find broad support as a spokesperson for the rights of children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. max Cleland
....Let Jane pay for someone like Max Cleland to do this.He has the trust and respect of most Americans and he has fought wars including the rethugs! It would be 100% better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Sounds good to me n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. Lefties aren't squabbling over Jane Fonda.
Although I wish we'd stop feeding the trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. bingo eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. ?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. what makes you think it's the lefties?
I never knew lefties to get in a huff over jane fonda, just right wingers. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. There are some who think "we" should be very careful not to offend
the right. They argue that anyone who the right attacks should be denounced and ostracized so that "we" can be more appealing to the most brainwashed and ignorant segments of the US population. Thus, they say, in the interest of "winning," it is very important that "we" do not associate with people or causes that might draw the ire of the corporate media. They argue this way, of course, for "our" best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Who's Jane Fonda? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
46. Because Re-fighting THAT War Keeps Focus off of THIS War n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
47. It's red-baiting by the "moderates" who fear being called radicals.
All the anti-war "lefties" I've known over many years think Jane is a hero. The timid wing of the Democratic Party seem to have trouble with her because supporting her efforts will upset Rush Lumpbutt and his ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. Because a lot of them are childish
little babies who are still nursing a 35 year old resentment and are toxic in their bitter hatred of a woman who apologized but apparently have forgiven the unrepentant Nixon, Kissinger, Westmoreland, et. al.

or not.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. It's that decades old resentment that
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 12:29 PM by LibDemAlways
gets me. I posted yesterday on another thread that if Jane wants to be an activist senior citizen, that's her right. One person wrote an impassioned response telling me I was being insensitive to Vietnam Vets and letting me know how much he/she despises Fonda. Sorry, but Fonda, though naive at the time of her 1972 trip, was trying to use her celebrity to end the war and bring the troops home. Her book delivers an interesting account of the trip as well as her motives, admission of mistakes, and regrets. She later made "Coming Home" which was all about the plight of the Vietnam Vets.

You are right. Where is all the hatred toward the architects of the war who were responsible for the death and destruction? Why on earth should anyone care, over 30 years later, about the bit part played by an actress turned activist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Naive, please. jane was 34 year old...
when she made her trip to North Vietnam. She was even older when she called our returning POWs liars and hypocrites. Her apology came in 1988, 16 years later, because we were demonstrating at her movie site. Why should anyone hold a grudge over 30 years later? Perhaps if you were a VietNam veteran you would understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. Oooh, there it is!
It's the "I'm a Vet" defense.

Well, no point in duscussing this, you've pulled rank on me.

:hi:

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. I consider it childish to forgive an enemy who "apologised"...
under duress and years after the fact. Her "apology" came years after the war and only after our demonstrations slowed shooting on her movie. Please point out where anyone has forgiven Nixon, Kissinger, Westmoreland, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #58
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
54. because carl rove is a traitor
along with the rest of the cabal.

that's why we talk about other less important things, because there are bigger fish to fry.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
60. Jane Fonda suppressed my sexism...

...and eventually cured me of treating women like mindless drones.

What a revelation to discover an articulate, attractive and liberal woman who was willing to sacrifice her career for a pro-humanity political choice. She showed us that EVEN 'privilege' wanted this war to end.

That helped the anti-war effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
61. Of course manufactured. She had an incredible film career after
the war. She was also a great box office draw. That should tell you something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC