Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Welcome to 1984

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:57 PM
Original message
Welcome to 1984
I returned yesterday from a week in Hawaii and was emptying my 12 year old daughter's suitcase of an assortment of still damp beachwear when I came across a slip of paper informing me that the case had been opened at the airport on Kauai and hand inspected by TSA. Now a planeload of American tourists returning from vacation on a small island poses no threat to anybody. Yet the TSA has been given the authority to riffle through dirty undies and soiled tee-shirts at random simply because...well...the government says they can. The same daughter also had her carry-on swabbed for explosives after it had gone through the x-ray machine and revealed nothing more interesting than flip-flops and the latest Teen People magazine. I realize these people are only doing their job, but my God, we're paying to have strangers fingering our personal possessions for no good reason. I'm all for smart security. But this is just plain dumb. The loss of personal privacy at the hands of Big Brother has become the real threat, and Americans, still traumatized by 911, have all too easily and readily given up the freedom they supposedly cherish. What will be next? Strip searches of random passengers while the rest look on? Nothing is out of bounds with the BFEE in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would have to disagree that it is for no good reason.
Events have shown otherwise. Plane bombs and hijackings do occur.

Also, it is random screening. They check bags at random.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I agree, SD.
I travel all the time, and I haven't had a bad experience with TSA. They are usually quite polite and professional, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They open bags after swabbing them
for explosives and after seeing who they belong to. You must personally present your bag to the screener. A twelve year old child returning from a Hawaiian vacation has never, to my knowledge, committed an act of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. A 12 yo child is a perfect target for someone putting something in ..
her bag without her knowing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. There is always a first time. There have been female suicide bombers.
Why not put the bomb in your childs luggage... They are less likely to search it, right?

Sorry, but airport screening is a necessary annoyance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. As I said, the bag is opened only
after it's already been swabbed for explosives - something I have no problem with. Unless sunscreen residue qualifies as an "explosive" there's no good reason to open the bag once it's passed the "no explosives" swab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. The swab is far from 100% effective. Random screening is needed also./nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Boy, we sure have a lot of supposed DUers here eager to be searched!
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 09:06 PM by shance
Im sorry this happened to you and your family. I would have found it intimidating as well and what concerns me is I am hearing this from other Dems who are traveling.

I think an important step for anyone who has this happen, is to call their local ACLU chapter to inform them of your recent experience and ask them, if this is standard procedure or have they found an unusual amount of activists/progressives having their luggage searched and themselves searched more than is standard procedure.

Being that TSA and Homeland has been instigated largely through this administration and given that they have violated privacy laws by creating a 'no-fly' list, this is something that Americans who oppose the Administrations policies need to be aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. So you can not be a DUer and support airport screening? lol /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Not sure about "eager to be searched"....but we have a whole bunch...
...who seem to want to have profiling instituted. That shocks me on a progressive forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Nicole Richie would agree with you.
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 05:10 PM by MercutioATC
"Lionel Richie's daughter Nicole had to show her breasts to airport security staff after her nipple ring triggered off metal detectors."



http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1026865.html?menu=



For chrissakes, it's NICOLE RICHIE! She's considered a threat now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I think she WANTED to show them (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'd agree, but there were no paparazzi involved...
(to be fair, Nicole has calmed her act down a bit...I haven't read anything wild about here in a while)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Diana Ross has been "felt up" at the
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 05:17 PM by LibDemAlways
airport as well. Last year metal in my ankle from an old injury set off the metal detector in Seattle and sent me, a fifty-plus housewife off to the feel-up zone too. I'm sorry, but it's gotten ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Been to a Courthouse lately?
Intrusive searches are the rule anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. As I recall, this happened after a rash of courthouse shootings..
With the drama on display at family court especially, I think I would want the extra security if I worked there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Actually I was thinking farther back
Williamson county always had serious security, Travis has had it for sometime, certainly before the recent problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ben said it best . . .
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. –Benjamin Franklin, 1759


What do they do with suit cases that are locked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Locked cases have the locks cut off.
It is clearly stated at all TSA checkpoints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Somehow I do not think Ben would be talking about this particular
type of incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. For a liberal/progressive forum, there sure are a lot of people..
in favor of profiling on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I started the thread and am not at all in favor
of "profiling." I am all for "smart" security. Swabbing every bag for explosives is fine by me. But "random" searches of already x-rayed, swabbed bags makes no sense and strikes me as intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Two quotes from you:
"A twelve year old child returning from a Hawaiian vacation has never, to my knowledge, committed an act of terrorism."

"Now a planeload of American tourists returning from vacation on a small island poses no threat to anybody."

Those sound like pleas for profiling to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bennywhale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. I concur with your worry. The control
of the population is only half done to combat any threat.

Tyrannical and authoritarian measures have always come in throughout hiustory under the guise of "security"

The problem is once these liberties are gone, due to the nature of this open ended "war" they will never return.

The causes should be fought instead of a plaster on th symptons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Its because of the drugs war
Your daughter was probably smuggling 2 keys of hawaiian sativa, and
they busted her, have thrown her in prison, and have replaced her
with a robotic imitation.

Check to see of the back of your daughter's head comes off, and if it
does, check the logo on the integrated circuts in there.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Was anything stolen out of the luggage?
Wonder where the liability would be in that scenario.

Where is your daughter's diamond ring - i thought it was in that bag before you found the slip of paper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Nothing stolen. They do claim to put it all back.
Nevertheless, I think these "random" searches should be conducted in front of the owner of the suitcase, not in secret as is currently the case. Before long we'll be ordered to keep our houses unlocked when we leave so the government can come in and check out our stuff at will. That's where we seem to be heading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. every bag is supposed to be checked
all my checked bags get the tsa love note

we're supposed to have 100 percent of pax bags inspected now

would be more weird if the bag wasn't inspected

plastic explosives don't show on xray

how do you lose privacy by someone giong through your dirty swimsuits, they already suspect you of swimming if you went to hawaii
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. One checked bag was inspected, the other not.
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 09:48 PM by LibDemAlways
I was told to leave the suitcase unlocked "in case of" a "random" inspection. Whatever. But don't I have a right to be present while the government is going through my already x-rayed, explosives-tested stuff? This fingering the underwear in secret business I think crosses the line between legitimate security concern and invasion of personal privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. uhm... I'm a flight attendant and i would like every bag checked..
right now they don't check all checked luggage and that scares the crap out of me...
the whole airline security is just for show
i want all bags checked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
31. I would feel better if all bags were checked.
At least then you can be sure that tsa isn't selecting "certain people" for their "random searches". And the bags should be checked in front of the owners.

I think there is a fine line between actually trying to keep people safe and using security as a way to take away the people's rights. A line that both sides have to be careful of crossing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC