Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge sentencing would-be LA bomber, blasts Bushco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:36 AM
Original message
Judge sentencing would-be LA bomber, blasts Bushco
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/07/27/state/n235930D68.DTL

Judge chides Bush administration's anti-terror tactics while sentencing would-be LA bomber

By GENE JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

(07-27) 23:59 PDT Seattle (AP) --

The sentence itself was fairly straightforward: An Algerian man received 22 years for plotting to bomb the Los Angeles airport on the eve of the millennium. It was what the judge said in imposing the term that raised eyebrows.

U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour said the successful prosecution of Ahmed Ressam should serve not only as a warning to terrorists, but as a statement to the Bush administration about its terrorism-fighting tactics.

"We did not need to use a secret military tribunal, detain the defendant indefinitely as an enemy combatant or deny the defendant the right to counsel," he said. "The message to the world from today's sentencing is that our courts have not abandoned our commitment to the ideals that set our nation apart."

He added that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks have made Americans realize they are vulnerable to terrorism and that some believe "this threat renders our Constitution obsolete ... If that view is allowed to prevail, the terrorists will have won."


..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, this judge warms my heart's cockles!
Nice to see someone who stands up for what he believes and isn't afraid to express those beliefs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue sky at night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am sure he will be drummed out of..........
office or found dead of an "apparent suicide".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthboundmisfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now THIS is a judge worthy of promotion & appointment.
He truly RESPECTS our Constitution.
I hope Judge Coughenour will go far!:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bad judge!
No SCOTUS nomination for you! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nom. to highlight one of the good guys! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'll second that emotion n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace4all Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. think I'll use these quotes in a LTTE
he really nails it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Right On!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sensenbrenner will be on his ass
and criticize the sentence and order the judge to to change the sentence and give him life or the death penalty. It's part of his new job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. & Pat Poberts will start the "investigation" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. bush and company
Bush and company seem like they really relish taking the power and making things happen. Something like ethics is just an annoying hindrance. That is why all these power hungry guys are surrounding bush for a chance to jump in and do something and express their egos, rumsfeld, rove, cheney. He got them all in the door. I think of Bush's line in that taped phone conversation where he said "I want to lead, that is why I wouldn't smoke pot", or something similar. What does he equate leadership with? Running around invading people, stomping on the constitution? Puzzling. I don't get his psychological motivation. :freak:
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StaggerLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. True patriot!

:patriot:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Brilliant. That needed to be said.
How long before forced retirement for this judge do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Gee... I wonder why he wasn't considered for SCOTUS?
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 11:28 AM by tk2kewl
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyhuskyfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. The full story...
Is that he only became a judge because his wife was on the judicial committee that appointed him. His wife holds all the power in that family -- Judge John actually still wets his bed.

I'm afraid I've already said too much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. ==
this "desk-jockey" wife no doubt single handedly anointed him, bypassing any judicial committee. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well Stated On His Part! Kicker!
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 08:01 AM by DistressedAmerican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC