|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:37 AM Original message |
"Scientists Experiment With Current in Nev." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why oh why does this sound like research for a space weapon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Note that it has something to do with Nukes.. or so they say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The only thing that I can think of on how this relates to nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Space weapons require massive amounts of energy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. This is the first step in producing Star Wars space weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I was actually hoping for the independence thing.. but they didn't say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
7. Our Warhead developers achieve a simpler/better Atomic bomb? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. What does a "better" nuke entail? Bigger boom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I'm just reading the words in the newsletter that says"better" means fewer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 08:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Sounds like a bigger boom to me. Do you think they are working on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Hellfire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-28-05 09:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Less costly exotic material/design easily tested for lack of decay over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC