Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Got A Call From The FBI Yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:45 AM
Original message
Got A Call From The FBI Yesterday
Phone rings. I pick up.

"This is Agent XXXXX, from the FBI. Can i ask you a couple of questions?" I told him "Sure". (I did ask for corroboration, a phone number where he could be reached, etc.) Then i called HIM back, and really did get the FBI front desk. So, it's all legit.

Well, anyway apparently as part of their responsibility to HSD, they are randomly perusing files and he asked, "Has anyone contacted you regarding your chemical knowledge of explosives?" I said "No. If someone had, i would have called you guys." He said thanks, and that was it.

Seems a fairly inefficient way to combat terrosism.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Should have said, "why yes. All these anti-abortion folks
call me all the time. I wonder why"..


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Should Have Thought Of That
However, probably best not to mess with the FBI when you have an explosives file with them. Ya think?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why they aren't terrorist
they are fetus liberators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Aren't abortion doctors fetus liberators?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. Only in an Iraqi innocent civilian collateral damage
sort of way . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. yeah I'm sure the FBI would have a wonderful sense of humor about that
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM by Catholic Sensation
HEY YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID "I DON'T KNOW, HEY OSAMA, HAVE WE GOTTEN ANY CALLS HERE ABOUT EXPLOSIVES?"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Do you want the Professor to join Lil Kim in jail?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I Know I Don't Want That!
Especially since i didn't do anything.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
44. Don't ever say anything like that. In fact, take the name and badge
number and tell him you'll call him back when you have a tape recorder. Identify them on the tape before you answer any questions, and if you feel uncomfortable with the questions, say so and say you want to consult your attorney. If Freeportgate showed me anything, it showed me to not to be sarcastic or unrecorded. They can make a mountain out of a molehill, especially if they claim you confessed.

Dangerous times for Dems folks. We are considered just a bit right of the "struggle against extremism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm SURE any scientist who did help a potential terrorist
would tell an FBI agent all about it.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good Point
Apparently i'm not a suspect. They're just checking. Like i said, seems inefficient. But, i did due diligence, and it really was the FBI.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Professor...that confirms my suspicions...we're all doomed!! lol....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here our federal government scored a major blow against terrorism
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM by slackmaster
By shutting down our local pirate radio station, which had by far the best programming available in the area.

:eyes:

http://www.pirate969.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. See, They're Doing Their Jobs, Just Wonderful
Ultimate example of efficiency! And, some $80k a year guy calls me on the phone to combat terrorism.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. was it SAC Wiggum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good One
No he seemed brighter than that! Lots. He was, in fact, very pleasant and business-like.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. LOL!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Interesting - CIA and NSA just answer with 4 digits and do not
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:54 AM by papau
admit who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. How Would You Know That?
How come you get called by NSA and CIA? How come!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. If he told you
He'd have to arrange for you to meet "an unfortunate accident"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Then I Don't Need To Know!
I'm not stupid!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. Long ago that was of interest for me - but a wait for the clearance
put me in private industry - for good.

But after 2 years of unreal invasion of privacy and trace backs of all around me I got my "high" clearance (back then there were only a dozen levels of high "top secret" clearance - I am told they have over 300 levels now!)

In any case, they "promoted" me (my entrance grade and pay on offer acceptance went up in various communications to me) for about 10 years after that. Last 30 years have been quiet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. So, You're NOT Spying On Me, Then
Whew! I was worried there.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. You could have really put a burr under their asses
"Why, no. I would have called you. I'll be sure to keep an eye out for that anthrax mailer, though. By the way, how are those pre-9/11 translations coming along?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I Figured It Best Not To Tweak Them
They've already got me on a list. Why irritate them further? Getting higher on the list so that more than a simple phone call is involved would be a bad thing.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
48. Maybe they just wanted to let you know, they know where you live!
Perhaps, the question about anyone contacting you about your knowledge of explosives was just an excuse, to call you and remind you that you are being watched. ;)

Actually, I think they are digging deeper into the Universities because many of those associated with terrorist attacks have attended Universities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. I Don't Work At A Uni Anymore Though
Besides, it's not that hard to find out where someone lives. Probably could do that over the internet anyway. The only reason to call me is my knowledge of explosives. That's it.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Shit.
Does that mean that we're NOT gonna make explosives this weekend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. It Does NOW!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Could they be monitoring your internet habits?
and found that you post on DU?

Obviously it doesnt mean anything sinister to rational people but these arent rational people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. My Names Been On This List Since The Late 70's
I was fingerprinted, had a background check, pictures taken. The whole deal. This wasn't a surprise. You can't take the type of instruction i took without this standard being met.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. of course, you were cleared to talk about this
during an ongoing investigation?

:tinfoilhat:

dp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I Didn't Ask
And, i'm not being investigated. That's why i was concerned about the relative inefficiency of this approach. Seems fairly unproductive.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Probably had one of them there "truth machines" hooked up to the line
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM by mtnester
just for you!
:tinfoilhat:

On edit - or one of them there voice imprint thingys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Voice Pattern Thingie?
Well, i told the truth, so i'm off the hook!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #32
53. Are you sure you didn't small talk golf scores?
Lying to an FBI agent is a crime! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. Nope
I can really shoot in the low 70's. Done it a bunch of times this year. So, that's not a lie either.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. That's the rub...
I know you shoot in the low 70's, but they can't believe you, and that's their benchmark on truth/lying: Your golf score response measured a lie in their world, so your lack of contact response is a lie, too...just a thought, Professor. ;)

I think I'm going to hit a bucket of balls today and try out some old persimmon woods that are new to me. A complete set - one through five (including a four wood)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. Are Wooden Woods Still Legal?
Just kidding. They do look good, don't they?
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. They sound good, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. ...whew...
good to know.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. Sounds pretty efficient to me.
Sure, they may not catch any terrorists that way, but it's a good way to let your average citizen know "we are watching you - we know who you are and where to find you".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yeah, But I Already Knew That
My name has been on file since the late 70's when i learned my knowledge of explosives and bombs. They won't let you take the short courses taught by ACE without a background check, fingerprints, & pix. So, i've known for over 25 years that they knew i was one to follow. I'm just surprised that this was considered a way to combat terrosism. Random phone calls to someone who's been on their list for this long to see if i would admit to being contacted by a terror group. If i had and was concerned, i would have called them. If i had, and was one of the bad guys, i wouldn't admit it. Seemed kind of silly.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #29
55. Maybe they're just washing their lists?
Cold-calling just to check that it's not stale data (like all reputable
telemarketing firms do!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
34. quite an efficient way to combat prematurely anti-fascist thinking tho
lying to an fbi agent is a federal crime

they have been known to twist any slight moment of confusion or really any statement at all into what they say is a lie

best never to answer fbi questions if you can help it

and if you must answer such questions don't elaborate on the statement, a simple yes or no will do

"if someone had, i would have called you guys," says you, but you know not their definition of "anyone" or "contact," a contact could be an email you never even opened, a phone call you forgot to return because it was a little off or you were busy or you never knew what it was really about


the fbi has their own definition of words and a man i know had troubles because he said "printer," where the fbi said "computer" -- by the fbi definition even your microwave is a computer if it has an integrated circuit in it -- very easy to trip someone up -- it was a damn printer not a computer -- still the man ends up in a rico case -- big mess

cointelpro teaches us that if the fbi can't pin a crime on a person because they are innocent, they may convict the person of "lying to the fbi"

scary stuff

don't know how an innocent person can protect themselves other than not to answer snoopy questions

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I'm Not Worried
If i was, i wouldn't have taken the ACE courses back in the day and gotten an FBI file in the first place. I'm on file. I can't do anything about that now.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. no point to worry
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM by pitohui
however much point to good planning

we all have a file if we've ever done anything really, best to keep answers to questions as simple as possible

i'm sure your attorney has told you the same

i think you'll be fine but i also think the fbi is not being inefficient here, which was the complaint

they will have their choice of people to round up when they need to if they need to, on obstruction and lying charges alone, with much documentation already to hand

would be nice to avoid being in the group that could be picked up on charges that look real to the media

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Then I Won't Worry
Besides, too late now.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
36. Weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Not Really That Weird
I suppose i should have noted in the first post that i've had a file with them since around 1977 because of some special instruction i took with the A.C.E. It required b'ground checks, pix and fingerprints. So, i've known for a long time that they know about me. But, i've never actually used the skills i learned, so i'm clean. I'm not worried about myself. I just thought this was a silly way to protect the homeland.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
40. You called him back at the number he gave you
and someone answered "FBI"?

I'm sure it was them, but that struck me as funny all the same - like you should ask him what office he's at, then go look up yourself what the phone number for the branch is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. No! I Short Formed The Story
I did due diligence before i answered any questions. I didn't cover the entire detail of that part of the conversation. I did exactly what you suggested. I asked for the primary number of the facility at which he was based, then checked the number for that location in the blue pages. I just didn't cover that detail the first time. I didn't think it important. But, i should have since it made you concerned. My fault.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. I thought of that instantly too! If I were pulling a scam, I'd have
an accomplice to answer the "font desk" phone too!

The only way you can check this for sure is to contact your local FBI office, give the info you have, and ask them to confirm or deny it's validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. Read My Reply
I just didn't think it important to cover all the details of due diligence. I did all that the poster suggested.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
43. They contacted professors at my alma mater too
But of course, that was AFTER the London bombing when they discovered a previous grad student/TA from NCSU was involved.

It's kind of weird to think that I was living in the same town as this terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Eeep!
Yeah, that's a little closer than i want to be to any extremist.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
50. Two FBI agents came knocking on my door 2 months ago
Scared the hell out of me. They showed me their badges and picture ID's. They wanted to know what I knew about the man across the street. I am renting and just moved here a few months ago. I have only seen the man (older man in his 50s or 60s) outside getting into his car or mowing the lawn and told them so. I think he lives alone there since I have never seen a woman or kids at that house.

I have no way of knowing if they were legit or not, but I watched from my window as they went to the house next door too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. That's nothing to be scared about
He's most likely a government employee or contractor with a clearance. Every few years they renew your clearance with a new background check, and it's standard procedure to go around to the neighbors asking questions for that.

So please don't be looking at him like he's a terrorist for the next few years!


stupid side story for that: during Desert Storm I needed my clearance updated, and I was living in family housing at the university, which was 95% foreign families. Some of the people they asked told me about it afterward: "They asked if I was a US Citizen, I said no, I'm Jordanian, and then they asked 'Well, if you WERE an American citizen, would you trust her with state secrets?'". My clearance was held up for a while, and finally an agent called me at my house to say they were having problems because they had to develop contacts from the last 5 years, and couldn't find any Americans in my community who knew me (I was living overseas for a chunk of that time). Apparently they had staked out my one American friend's house for a week, sitting through some awful weather - too far from a parking area to watch from a car, waiting for her to come home - during the week she was away on vacation. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
54. Was it agent Mike?
Anyways, you just blew a perfectly good business opportunity.

When someone from the government calls and asks you "Has anyone contacted you regarding your chemical knowledge of explosives?" you should answer "Why do you ask? Are you hiring?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. They Could Have Hired Me YEARS Ago
If they wanted me they could have called me 25 years ago. So, i just figure they don't want a weirdo like me around.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
59. A friend of mine back in '60s was hauled away for questioning.
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 11:09 AM by Tierra_y_Libertad
He was a sporadic, non-violent, anti-war protestor, who didn't belong to any radical organizations. But, he had worked as a dynamiter in some mine in Michigan.

Apparantly, the FBI goons had taken a picture of him at some protest, tracked his name down through an informant, checked his Air Force Records (he had gotten out by claiming to be a Communist) and started putting things together.

He's not the kind of guy to be intimidated by anything, and thought the whole thing hilarious.

Many years later, I came home from work and found an FBI agent's card in my mailbox with a note on the back to call him. I had been very active in the anti-war movement, participated in some violent demonstrations, had my picture taken several times, belonged to a couple of "radical" organizations and associated with several more.

As it turned out, the agent was doing a "background" check on a neighbor I didn't know.

I breathed a sigh of relief.

Nothing came of it, but

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. I Admit To Some Intitial Trepidation
That's why i told him i'd call him back. Some people were concerned that i called back at the same number, but i neglected, in the OP, to mention that i confirmed the number as a field office. But, when he first called, i was nervous thinking "Why would the FBI call me?" Once i knew why, i just thought it was a silly method to track down potential terrorist activities.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. As well you should. Those creeps don't exactly have a sterling record.
Especially concerning civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
65. Zoinkies!
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 11:34 AM by Susang
What a fun day you had! :eyes:

On edit: Glad you double checked their info! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC