Ed Shultz today: CAFTA
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:10 PM
Original message |
|
He's going to have Jim Moran, a Democrat who voted for the bill, and a Republican (didn't catch the name) who voted against it.
Ed is talking about the cheap labor issue.
|
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. he's why I listen to my computer from 2PM to 9 every day |
|
Randi is talking about Jessica Simpson's political awakening
did you hear about that?
hahahahahahaaaaaa
"Jessica Simpson has seen more combat action than our president.....she's more of a man than he!!!!"
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I like Randi but listen through XM |
|
and this is an important issue. I'm glad he's covering it. He's very against CAFTA.
|
ncrainbowgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What's the name of the repub? Has it come on yet? (n/t) |
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What Jim Moran is saying is |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 02:41 PM by demnan
that by having a trade deal with Central American more American materials will be used in manufacturing than would be used by the Chinese.
He also says that the cheap labor issue won't be as big an issue because of the the high tariffs in C.A.
"Right now only product that Central America can export is it's people - by providing jobs we can help alveviate the immigration"
Interesting points he makes. You have to remember that Jim Moran's district has a high population of Central American immigrants. They are probably in favor of this bill because it will help their relatives.
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ed Shultz is now comparing the loss of jobs from NAFTA |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 02:45 PM by demnan
with the possible loss of jobs with CAFTA. Shultz:"Do you feel like you betrayed the Democratic party?"
. . Moran:"I don't think we can wait another 3 years for an administration that will care more about trade . . . we have to try to move forward we have to try to work with our neighbors"
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Personally I am against CAFTA |
|
but I think Jim Moran did make some valid points on the subject. I think with the fact that China is making so many strides to make everything may be a selling point for others to have trade agreements to counter them.
However, the farmers never benefit from these deals.
|
Elwood P Dowd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
7. His argument is almost identical to what we were hearing about NAFTA |
|
in 1993. CAFTA will creat jobs and raise the standard of living in Central America. CAFTA will reduce illegal immigration. Typical bullshit.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I'm so sick of this shell game. |
|
What good COULD come from this type of agreement is negated because they won't put in the restrictions & regulations that would be necessary to make it good for everyone.
Nope... just a FASTER race to the bottom.
Idiots.
|
Up2Late
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
9. This is such a Red Herring, if they actually stopped all the... |
|
...illegal crossers, it would lead to the collapse of the American and Mexican economies. It's such Bull Shit.:freak:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.