Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Creepy update about the space shuttle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:33 PM
Original message
Creepy update about the space shuttle
ABC News is now reporting that in fact there were additional pieces of foam that broke off and DID hit the shuttle during take off. Yikes.

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/07/creepy-update-about-space-shuttle.html

***


My take is that the most likely possibility is that the only abnormal thing about this is that they had a camera to actually tape the foam falling off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you go to Crooks and Liars
They have a video of the take off from the Today show and you can see it coming out. I finally saw the video and the whole time I was holding my breath cause of last time. I'm so glad that it was successful. I hope President Kennedy is watching wherever he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think that this is new information
The piece they knew about before broke off at too high an altitude for anything bad to happen, because the air is so thin up there. It sounds like the pieces they're now describing broke off earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Could we please build a shuttle that isn't damaged by FOAM?
Or go back to building more economical rockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nightline did a piece on this last night.
Apparently NASA is in a panic. The new head of NASA is apparently getting slammed for letting it take off, for approving the mission.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. They blasted off with Mercury Retrograde. D'Oh
Astrologers, they say, are just a bunch of liberal whackos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL
:rofl:

They don't have to be liberal, I guess. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. When's the thing
spose ta land back on earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emperor_Norton_II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. August 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. My mother just said that she heard it damaged the wing ...
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 07:43 PM by BattyDem
just like the last time. :scared:

Did anyone else hear that? She said it was on the news tonight, but she couldn't remember if it was the local broadcast or the network/national broadcast.


On edit: She thinks it was ABC News. They were also talking about a possible rescue mission involving Atlantis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emperor_Norton_II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. MORE DATA
NASA analysts suspect at least one piece of foam insulation did in fact hit the wing of the space shuttle Discovery as it took off on Tuesday, ABC News has learned.

Engineers had believed that the foam did not strike Discovery, but new analysis has led them to suspect at least one small piece of foam did hit the shuttle's wing, leaving what engineers described as a scuff mark.


Not quite as creepy when you look at it with context, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Foam has likely been falling off shuttle tanks since first use
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 07:58 PM by Spinzonner
the issue is the size of the pieces and if and where they strike the orbiter and if the damaga is significant enough to cause a breach during reentry.

Apparently, until Columbia, none of the critical criteria came together.

One problem with the shuttle - which refers to the whole machine, not just the orbiter - is that has never, and probably can't, be realistically tested other than in actual flight. So all so-called fixes are theoretical until actually used.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The real problem with the shuttle...
is that it was supposed to be replaced 10-20 years ago by something better.

In the history of flight, 20 years is a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. And NASA management figures since it went ok before,
it will be ok this time as well.
Same kind of reasoning as with the infamous o-rings.
Firing of safety personel since then makes it easier for NASA management to discard the warnings and any advise not to launch.
The space shuttle now has a 1 in 50 catastrophic failure rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:08 PM
Original message
And in each case the managers were given a warning they chose not to heed

The Morton Thiokol Engineers who warned about the external temperatures before the launch of Challenger - ignored and criticized.

The NASA engineers who requested to have military satellites photograph Columbia on orbit to examine the wings after being hit by the tank insulation on liftoff - refused
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder what they're not telling us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. It isn't creepy so much as it is
a total and unmitigated disaster for the shuttle program. They have just gone through $1B and 2.5 years of effort to fix the 'big chunks of foam falling off the fuel tanks' problem and it is clear that the fix is a complete failure. They are back at square one, right where they were the day Columbia disintegrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. "They have just gone through $1B and 2.5 years of effort ..."
"...to fix the 'big chunks of foam falling off the fuel tanks' problem and it is clear that the fix is a complete failure."



Why is it that under this administration, EVERY government organization or program spends lots of money and time ... but never gets anything right? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. oh it isn't just this administration
the government's ability to waste vast sums and accomplish nothing is legendary.

I'm not sure that this was even a task that could be accomplished. They are stuck with a 30 year old design that, if I remember correctly, was more than a bit of a compromise at the time. The real failure here is the failure to develope a replacement system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You're right about that ...
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 08:16 PM by BattyDem
but at least other administrations got something right once in a while. I can't think of one good thing that this administration has done for the country or one real success that it's had.

The shuttle is grossly outdated. It should have been replaced years ago. I don't understand why they keep dumping money into the program instead of developing new technologies and vehicles. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. There is another thread here in GD with about 75 posts
I read it earlier the original poster states there is "no problem" and nothing to worry about. Is this news new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emperor_Norton_II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. A new detail, but nothing particularly "creepy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. What that probably means is that THIS flight dodged the bullet
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 08:15 PM by Spinzonner
but that because the fundamental problem has not been solved, the risk is unacceptably high for subsequent flights, depending on if and where a piece of external tank insulation falls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emperor_Norton_II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Which is why the brass put a hold on future flights
..not that they did the most intelligent thing and announce this after Discovery landed, thus saving us a few boatloads of hysterical reaction, but those are the breaks.

But yeah, that's a good summary of the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC