Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Better Hurry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:35 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Better Hurry
If he has anything he would be well advised to act know before this sham of a hearing to discredit him gets underway. The truth is about to be crucified upside down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I dont think so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. So where's an "OldLeftieLawyer" when you need one? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I was just wondering the same thing Dr.
Where is OldLeftie? I depend on her advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not.
He wil act when he is ready...he is tough as nails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I too have a real concern about Pat Roberts' "hearings"
Pre-emptive immunity in exchange for testimony just like they did for the Iran-Contra felons. I believe Judge Roberts was involved in that criminal enterprise as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Is that what they did?
Maybe we need a little DU history lesson on that - after all, it's the same players. Pretty likely they will try the same M.O. And I don't really remember how that all went. I wasn't paying attention at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. North, Poindexter, Abrams, they all had their felony convictions
overturned because they testified under immunity. Just like the cockroaches they are they never die they just go into hiding until the lights go out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. .
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 10:38 PM by Stephanie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. The difference is...
... what Fitzgerald is doing is taking place in a REAL court with REAL consequences, not the court of public opinion that doesn't really matter for shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. but gonzo can fire fitz
the smear needs to come first so that firing seems justified to the sheeple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Agreed...that was my reason for opening the thread.
Despite what we may want to believe about blind justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I don't think he can fire him.
I think he can remove him from his Chicago position but I don't think he can remove him from this case. Can he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. If Fizt has something on *,
no way * fires him. Just because the lead prosecutor is fired, the investigation will not stop ... in fact, it will be a public relations nightmare...see the Saturday Night Massacre ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I am not sure about that
Gonzales is recused from the case. I don't know who can fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes! This court currently is untouchable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agree but they CANNOT fire him with out a FIRE STORM.
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:56 PM by autorank
They're vile and underhanded, to wit, Senator Roberts supposedly holding hearings on the progress of the Fitzgerald investigation.

Before I responded I checked to see which DC area grand jury Fitzgerald was using.

If you want to really nail someone and move at break-neck speed for any court system, you'd use the Eastern District, Virginia. That district is famous for speed and efficiency. It may or may not be a liberal panel.

If you want to really nail a the "powerful" or a nasty Republican and move at a speed of your choice, you'd use the District of Columbia grand jury.

http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1083899,00.html

Here's what Matt Cooper, reporter who gave up his sources, said:
"Grand juries are in the business of handing out indictments, and their docility is infamous. A grand jury, the old maxim goes, will indict a ham sandwich if a prosecutor asks it of them. But I didn't get that sense from this group of grand jurors. They somewhat reflected the demographics of the District of Columbia. The majority were African American and were disproportionately women. ... These grand jurors did not seem the types to passively indict a ham sandwich. I would say one-third of my 2 1/2 hours of testimony was spent answering their questions, not the prosecutor's, although he posed them on their behalf. I began to take notes but then was told I had to stop, so I'm reliant on memory."

We'll see. I think that this is a motivated group led by a highly motivated prosecutor. Time is of the essence, unless he's going after Bush or Cheney, in which case, he must have all details in place.

Wouldn't it be funny if he was able to get Judith Miller's testimony from a jail house snitch at the Alexandria Womens Correctional Facility.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. i read that there were 10 african american women on GJ..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. here is a comment by Tom Flocco
A comprehensive grand jury investigation, with subpoenas, testimony and interrogation by independent, a-political career prosecutors like Patrick Fitzgerald could well blow the lid off 30+ years of illegal operations, financial terrorism, 9.11 mass murder, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Kennedy assassination and pre-emptive war based upon lies--a lengthy pattern of illegal activities by a succession of White House crime families, according to both Webb and V. K. Durham.

http://www.stewwebb.com/Financial%20terrorism%20towers%20over%20September%2011%20by%20Tom%20Flocco.htm

heads up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Color me surprised and blown away... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Malloy told earlier tonight
that he's up in October. So he'll have to be done either then or before then. I hope he hurries too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerOstrich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. What's the statutes of limitations on the (potential) crimes ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeirdHoward Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. Fitzgerald isn't leak happy
If you remember the Starr investigation, he leaked daily to the press. Fitzgerald is pursuing this matter in the appropriate way. It's not as satisfying for those of us who want to see justice served right away, but I trust and hope that it will be in due time. I'm expecting indictments this fall sometime.

-wh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC