Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wesley Clark: "humanitarian hawk" and why money raised doesn't matter...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:52 AM
Original message
Wesley Clark: "humanitarian hawk" and why money raised doesn't matter...
Highlite quotes:

even Karl Rove might have trouble turning a winner of the Silver Star into a weenie.

in “War in a Time of Peace,” David Halberstam writes that Clark “saw brilliantly what was in front of him ... like a laser scope.” Great quality in a president... but Halberstam also writes that “his peripheral vision ... was considerably more limited.”

Article Excerpts

If Wes Clark goes nowhere, you can already hear the tired punditry: He didn’t have enough cash. He started too late. Blah, blah, blah. This analysis has already begun, though it is close to meaningless.

LET’S START WITH THE MONEY. In the primary season, fund-raising is mostly just a fancy and not terribly accurate poll—a way to measure support among the wealthy and, with the Internet, the passionate. You can have half as much money as the next guy and still win because, unlike Senate campaigns, presidential contests are fought out in the “free media,” where live-TV skills trump paid ads. Money helps build a field organization that can cushion later missteps, but it’s the symptom, not the cause, of success. I’ve seen candidates win Super Tuesday states where they had no ads on the air and only a half-dozen volunteers on the ground. Remember: momentum generates money, not the other way around.

Similarly, early starts are relevant only if the candidate is simultaneously obscure and in touch with the national mood, like Jimmy Carter in 1976. Four and a half months—the time between now and the first primaries—is plenty of time to introduce oneself to the voters.

Clark’s timing is exquisite. In any other election year, a former general wouldn’t have a chance in the Democratic Party, which is deeply ambivalent about the military. But active Democrats know that they must restore credibility on this issue to stay competitive as a party. Even if he fades, Clark helps in that process. Republicans are already trying to tar him with the Clinton brush; both are Rhodes scholars from Arkansas (though not close friends), and a chunk of Clinton’s staff is joining Clark. Yet even Karl Rove might have trouble turning a winner of the Silver Star into a weenie. Clark pushed so hard to liberate Kosovo in 1999 that he alienated the other brass. They were wrong and he was right, and millions of lives were saved. The timing is good for a humanitarian hawk. Although he hasn’t yet outlined specifics, Clark’s message is also strong. It will basically be that he is more in touch than Bush on domestic policy and more competent on foreign policy.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/969672.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. About the Rove spin machine.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Funny how some folks at DU have fallen for it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Dont worry about the Negativity ....
It will all resolve in the end ....

U N I T Y ... will prevail ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No worries here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. In every single contested primary races
since 76 the guy with the most money won. Carter outraised Kennedy, Mondale outraised Hart, Dukakis ourraised all comers in 88, Clinton outraised all comers in 92, and Gore outraised Bradley in 00.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. This pretty much sums up my amazement at the Clark support
From the above article:

"Although he hasn’t yet outlined specifics, Clark’s message is also strong."

The first part of the qoute proves the unfounded nature of the second part.

Why is anyone willing to support someone whose policies have not been set forth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC