Freepers trying to turn

[raysr]

this poll http://www.thekcrachannel.com/news/4784016/detail.html
(Controversial Artwork)

[Kerrytravelers]

1. DUne and kicked.

:kick:

[friesianrider]

2. Done, kicked. nt

[Goldeneye]

3. done

[Union Thug]

4. done nt

[Southsideirish]

5. Done!

[Tommymac]

6. Done. nt

[evlbstrd]

7. Done.

[tomg]

8. done

[movonne]

9. done

[Dave Reynolds]

10. Done

And I always think it says "crackchannel".

[Rainscents]

11. Done!

[Erika]

12. done n/t

[Jamison]

13. Done

.

[WeirdOne]

14. That artwork kinda makes the Department of Justice look bad doesn't it?

Basically saying there is no justice. Maybe it's true, but not a good message to send.

[LeftyMom]

18. It's at the state DOJ building

It's not in a federal building or office.

[Swamp Rat]

15. Done n/t

[personman]

16. Done.

[walldude]

17. Done... Wait a sec... Done..

After re-reading the question I voted, because it asked if "the" artwork should be displayed. If you are going to have an art display then all artwork should be included. If they had removed the word "the" from question, then I probably wouldn't have voted. I don't see any need for a government building to have art displays. The same way I don't see a need for the government to display religious paraphernalia. Next thing you know they'll be twisting the law saying that the 10 Commandments painted in a circle around a Velvet Jesus is a work of art and therefore should be displayed in every federal building in America. Somehow I think when it comes to government property things should remain neutral. You want to have displays in government buildings, have photos of the American people going about their lives and pics of all the beautiful places in America. The beaches in Miami, The Rocky Mountains, The Grand Canyon, The Painted Desert. Stuff like that. A daily reminder to the government of who and what they work for. Just MHO ;)

[knowbody0]

19. kick