Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark was a Rethuglican until a month ago.....he couldnt run against *...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:50 AM
Original message
Clark was a Rethuglican until a month ago.....he couldnt run against *...
so he changes parties...how transparent is that?

Dean is my man, with good fiscal policies and a clean slate as a Democrat.

President Dean, yes I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Clark was a Republican
then why did he vote for Clinton 2x, and Gore in 2000? Why did he campaign for Democrats running for office in 2002?


http://www.dmregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/20029892.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. but then why did he raise money for the Republican party
as recently as June, 2001? that is where he made his comments about Reagan and the first Bush and that the second Bush has "a great team" including Rumsfeld,ect. It was at a Republican Party Fund-raiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The same reason he did for Democrats as recently as fall of 2002..
...he has friends in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. fine
and some of his friends are now people that Kerry and Dean are calling on to resign.

The facts are that he admits he was a Republican and voted for people like Nixon and Reagan and the first Bush and he then says he switched to Clinton and Gore but he still was raising money for the GOP as late as 2001--I'm sorry but why should this man be the Democratic nominee over the many lifelong Democrats who are running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
48. Looks to me as if CLark is not dem or republican...


but rather simply an opportunist.


Sorry but I’m not voting for anybody for the dem nomination who does not have an established democratic record… and LIEBERMAN has a better record than Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. can you PROVE he voted for Clinton and Gore NO NO NO nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. And I can say the same to you
Can you PROVE he voted for Nixon and Reagan? No. So, we'll both have to either believe him or not, 'k?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
63. Yes we can
Clark said he voted for Nixon/Reagan.

Or are you saying Clark is a liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. Can you PROVE "you" voted for Clinton and Gore? Yea, me neither
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:47 AM by NNN0LHI
Damn hard to prove a negative. Ain't it?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. Well let's see...
Why would you vote for Clinton when Clinton is giving you a high ranking military job? Hmmm why why why.... Just can't figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. There's this thing called a PRIMARY
If he was a rethug, he would be challenging Bush in a Republican one. What is it with these junk posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He changed parties a month ago.
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Says who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
61. Howard Dean says so.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Was he actually registered as a Republican, or did he
just vote that way back in the eighties?

There's a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Sources? No? Wishful thinking? YES!
...so obvious with those like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. here is a link...."Just when and why did Clark become a Democrat anyway"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. This is the same old same old addressed here over and over..
...it doesn't say or imply Clark was a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertrand Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. No
It says he registered as a Democrat less than a month ago, not that he was a Republican and switched parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. Well, when he decided to run (oh, when he was "drafted")...
...as he said, there was only one choice, running for the Democratic nomination. See, the Republicans already have their nominee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappurr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. Please document your contention that Clark was a registered republican
And I have always spoken very highly of John Dean and seriously considered voting for him in the primary. But with the flagrant flaming posts against Clark, containing the same kind of lies and exaggerations that the Deanies say they detest in the RW, I'm starting to wonder what kind of man attracts supporters like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well said...
A few of the Deanies are really showing their desparation by using rightwing tactics to detract from Clark.

Just like the rethugs, they're repeating the same lies and exaggerations even after they've been exposed.

It's the old rightwing way: Repeat it enought and people will believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
47. Here you go Cappurr
This is not proof that he was a Registered Republican- rather that he only registered Democrat this month, September 2003. I think I read earlier that he was a registered Independent but honestly not sure. Keep thinking highly of Dean. My esteem for him is growing.

You should really read this thread when you have time because it may provide you with a few more missing pieces that I didn't find very re-assuring:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=423043#424808

Thursday, September 18, 2003

Speaking on May 11, 2001, as the keynote speaker to the Pulaski County Republican Party's Lincoln Day Dinner, Clark said that American involvement abroad helps prevent war and spreads the ideals of the United States, according to an AP dispatch the following day.

Two weeks later, a report in U.S. News and World Report said Arkansas Republican politicos were "pondering the future of Wesley Clark:" "Insiders say Clark, who is a consultant for Stephens Group in Little Rock, is preparing a political run as a Republican. Less clear: what office he'd campaign for. At a recent Republican fund-raiser, he heralded Ronald Reagan's Cold War actions and George Bush's foreign policy. He also talked glowingly of current President Bush's national security team. Absent from the praise list -- his former boss, ex-Commander in Chief Bill Clinton."

Clark told CNN's Judy Woodruff earlier this month that he had decided to register as a Democrat. Left unsaid and unknown at this point is exactly when and why he decided to become a Democrat.

http://www.politicsus.com/front%20page%20archive/091803.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. This issue needs to be discussed
over, and over, and over, and over, and over again...
Because "Is Too!" and "Is Not!" is productive dialogue... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Yes, most ReTHUGlicans believe exactly that. It involves smearing
and lying about the competition. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. flame bait ... and pathetic at that. I predict a ...
locking in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yes Dean will make a great ...
V.P. the Presidency is out of his reach though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. clark is at best VP material
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 AM by Noordam
IT IS ABOUT THE ECONOMY STUPID

I want an economy president not a war president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I want a President just like Clinton!
And I see that in Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Gimme a C.....
-l-a-r-k!

Clark!

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. Got somethin'
I don't know what yet...but I've learned over the years to trust images that come to me over and over after an event...and after the debate, for hours and even through the night...the image of Wesley Clark kept appearing behind my eyelids.

He hit an emotional connection with me...and I think that means he's the closest thing to "that Thing" in the field.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Whoa!
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 PM by PassingFair
Maybe you're "channeling" Clark's democratic birth father too! See you at Lourdes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Economy president - right! That's why I want Clark:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. If one believes Clark is VP material
wouldn't it stand to reason that he's presidential material also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. Clean slate???
What about SS, Medicare, Toxic label by the Sierra Club. And sealing his records? Real clean slate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. What is troubling
here is that when Jim Jeffords switched parties and became an independent he was cheered as a hero by democrats. He was voting with republicans up to the last minute. Democrats have been begging John McCain to become an independent. Democrats have been begging Lincoln Chafee and Olympia Snowe to leave the republican party. These defections would be greeted with celebration. Dean has deeply disappointed me with his attacks on Clark's loyality to the democratic party. It is gutter politics and I expect more from him. Anyone one who joins the Democratic party should be accepted and welcomed. Clark should be tested and challenged on policy, not on this issue. I know a lot of people here listen to Mike Malloy, I listen often myself. But I think he is wrong when he makes statements asserting that he hates all republicans and that all republicans are evil. I think this kind of message undercuts one's credibility. I personally know republicans who think Bush is an idiot and has royally screwed up the country. It is participating in a rather immature analysis to paint anyone who has ever been or voted for a republican as marked for life with a big red R on their forehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Is this the meme of the week over at www.clarkland.com?
Jeffords screwed over the republicans, that is what made us all happy. Jeffords did not ask for Democratic support. He went from against us to neutral. Clark is trying to go from against us to our leader. There is a HUGE difference between the situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Hopefully Clark will screw the Repubs 'big-time'.....
DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. No, actually
It is my very own meme from this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. I've been hearing it for a few days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Wondering about the heroic Jeffords act too....
I also welcome a whiff of fresh air with Clark's bi-partisan roots.

:hi:

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
51. Jim Jeffords did not switch parties to seek higher office.


Clark did switch parties to seek higher office.... that of CIC over a 4 star general.

"Dean has deeply disappointed me with his attacks on Clark's loyality to the democratic party. It is gutter politics and I expect more from him. Anyone one who joins the Democratic party should be accepted and welcomed."


I'd be happy to welcome congressman Clark into the party.... and after he has an established record of demcoratic service, I'd be happy to vote him into higher offcie.

However he has no such record and is only just joined the party and does not just want to be welcomed, but voted in as our nominee for president.

That's a bit different than being simply accepted and welcomed, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
56. What is important is that he is a Democrat now.
Don't we want people to leave the republican party and join us? Why is this such a huge problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
23. In Arkansas, I don't believe one has to register
as Democrat or Republican. If you were voting in a primary, you could change every time if you chose to do so and vote in one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. Ummm
He has said repeatedly that he voted for Clinto AND gore both, and if we can't DIS-prove that, we're only going to hurt ourselves in the long run by continuing to bring this up. The man SAYS he's a Dem, and since i have no proof that he's NOT, I take him at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
31. Clark wants to privatize social security
I don't understand why he's getting a free pass on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. That is absolutely not true
Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Clark's getting a free pass on a lot of issues.
And I don't get it, either.

I'm dismayed when I see that democrats who would be protesting loudly an obviously anti-dem statement or proposition all of a sudden rationalize it if their candidate supports says it or supports it. And it's not just Clark supporters who do so. I understand compromising here and there if you've found someone who stands for most of what you do. I don't understand the willful popularity contests; "I like this guy best no matter what he says or does; no matter what his record is." That seems like self-destruction to me.

As for Clark, is there an issue that the other candidates don't address as well or better? I'm left to assume that the hoopla is a military one; dems afraid they can't beat bush because of the current terrorist fears and military presences around the world without an actual military guy at the helm. Like bush has some sort of military experience that makes him a military leader. :eyes:

And the military connection is what raises flags for me. I'm betting that when Clark defines his position on domestic issues, it won't sound too much different than the rest of the candidates. They're dem issues, and he'll have to address them.

But privatization....that's a republican agenda. Where's the concern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. why would anyone be concerned about a bullshit lie? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Because it's not true.
There is no concern there because it's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. What we really need
is a domestic platform. That would help us determine the truth of that statement. Does Clark have something organized and defined on domestic issues that we can look at? The impression that I've gotten...just my impression...is that he has alot to say about foreign affairs, and isn't ready to talk about domestic affairs in detail. Which I would think he would be prepared to do; he's had all of this year to develop something to present to us, while the rest of the candidates have been campaigning.

If he has come up with something recently that I don't know about, please give a link. I'll check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. COMPLETE BULLSHIT
You are either ignorant or deliberately spreading misinformation.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. where in the WORLD did you get that misinformation?
It is utterly, absolutely untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. MSNBC's Townhall show
A couple of congressman/senators were on and spoke about what Clark was for. Another issue was that when Clark spoke, the Republicans really liked what he had to say (at many points his rating among Republicans was above 75% favorable). I'm sure that means that Clark has a good chance of bringing voters together, but I'm very concerned that he thinks privatizing Social Security is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phegger Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. Clark...
...has flat-out said that he does NOT favor privatizing Social Security. Is some kind of group hysteria taking over here or what??

-ph :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. That's funny
Because it's entirely not true, perhaps?

I mean, you can only trot out "He voted for Reagan! He's Satan" so many times, but I thought you guys could come up with something a little better.

He answered that question pretty decisively (though a bit long-winded, I'll give you), during the debate last Thursday.

So stop spreading FUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
42. Clark has admitted voting for Nixon twice, Regan twice and bush sr once
Clinton twice and Gore once...ok now move along...nothing to see here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm glad you're supporting McGovern...errr...I mean...Dean.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. a general appeal to decency: please STOP using McGovern's name as a slur
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:37 PM by noiretblu
it's not only unfair...it's undeserved and reprehensible. the man was and is a fine DEMOCRAT, and with a long and distinguished career as a public servant. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
50. Green is the new Orange n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
55. KUCINICH, GREEN or DEAN right?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Thats kinda funny you think like that
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:32 PM by JohnKleeb
I am a Kucinich supporter and believe me Kerry is up there on my list as is Gephardt and Edwards well they are in my middle. Now Clark he isnt. I am pretty near green party politics too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phegger Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
58. Based on what?
Clark was a Rethuglican until a month ago

Based on what?

(Besides hysterical hyperbole and misinformation)


-ph :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC