Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lets use the Correct word>>>>>>>>> Blastocyst

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:05 AM
Original message
Lets use the Correct word>>>>>>>>> Blastocyst
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 10:05 AM by bluedog
Blastocysts
A human blastocyst


A blastocyst is a stage of development of an embryo when it is around five days old and made up of about 100 cells. A blastocyst at the stage at which embryonic stem cells would be extracted is still young enough to be able to divide into two embryos, making identical twins, or in rare cases, merge with another blastocyst, even one of the opposite sex<1>, to create a chimera, an individual comprised of populations of cells with two different sets of DNA. From the biological point of view, these points mean the blastocyst is not yet an individual. Blastocysts are an early developmental stage far from possessing a nervous system (or any other organs), and thus biologically speaking do not have feelings.



eople think "baby" when one say embryonic stem cells, the real word should be used always.......in spoken and written statements about this....you know how dense the right is.....

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. As someone mentioned in another thread: can you take a tax deduction
for that "child" ? No? Then it ain't a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Don't give them any ideas. These MFers are so desperate they might
just do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Then I'll take a deduction for every sperm in my nuts
Or at least half a deduction. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. There ya go! Damn, I'm losing all my deductions but fast
(periomenopause!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Perfectly put....thankyou n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. The blastocyst will, if not killed, ultimately develop into

what even you call a baby.

That's an undeniable fact. Life does begin at conception; from the beginning, the rapidly developing embryo shows all the traits that biologists use to identify something as being a living thing,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's NOT a baby at that stage.
You just admitted that. ......"The blastocyst will, if not killed, ultimately develop into" Life does not begin at conception. Life begins at BIRTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. what I call a baby
is a being that grows inside the mother for months.........the first flutter is the sign of life.a woman feels this...

the process of ..freezing the "cells" which will probably never be used for a living breathing life......is a strange way to say that these "beings" should not be destroyed by cell research..........when in time these viles are tossed and destroyed.............thats where the GOP are wrong........they are disgarded and not used to even benefit living lives and in many cases babies............follow that logic
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Repeating something ad nauseam and calling it an "undeniable fact"
doesn't make it a fact.

"The blastocyst will, if not killed, ultimately develop into what even you call a baby."

The same could be said about a sudden urge to have sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. so does my sinus infection
Judging by the pain in my face, it's probably got a lot more than eight cells too. Anybody want to start a picket at the Kiaser pharmacy or can I go get some my antibiotics in peace?

We have to draw the line somewhere and if we're drawing it at organisms with few cells and no organization we're going to have to ban soap and antibiotics. No baking bread, all that yeast shouldn't die for your convenience.

You'd better plant all the seeds in your food too- that's a potential apple there in that core!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree! We should call it BLASTOCYST STEM CELL RESEARCH.
Put a pen dot on a piece of paper and show the sheeple what a BLASTOCYST looks like. HARDLY a 'baby' :eyes: The Democrats in Congress should NEVER, EVER, EVER call it Embryonic Stem Cell Research. That's just playing into the religious RWer's hands. Just like they tried to call Late Term Abortions, Partial Birth abortion. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. That is a good idea. "Embryonic" isn't even accurate.
Good thinking, and I'll pass it on to people in SCR activism, if that's okay by you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. PLEASE DO.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Accuracy doesn't matter to the Repugs.
Remember "Partial Birth Abortion"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. "Embryonic" is accurate, it's just that
"blastocyst" is MORE specific.

"Embryonic" can refer to any point in time in the entire embryonic process of development. A blastocyst, however, is a very specific stage when the embryo is comprised of eight cells. And THAT is what many couples have frozen as a result of in vitro fertilization.

An analogy:

child

or

newborn, infant, toddler, preschooler, school-age, pre-teen, etc.

Embryo is a bit of a generic term, but blastocysts ARE embryos just like a toddler is a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. So many of these people are truly ignorant
of any and all biology. Apart from using the term baby, I have heard them call them fetuses and even, infants. They talk about harvesting "body parts" (???), or when the supply runs out from IVF, using "aborted babies".

If they refuse to even learn basic biology, they are absolutely hopeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. "toddlers," once even, by some woman to another DUer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. I thought a blastocyst was Rush Limbaugh's excuse
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 10:22 AM by SpiralHawk
for wiggling out of service to the nation in the military?

Or possibly what Jeff Gannon ejaculated ("Blast-O-cyst!") after his first date with Rush?

Could I be wrong?

This thread is very helpful in terms of "re-educating" me.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. Next thing you know, an episode of lusting will need
protection as it could result in a baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Interested in pushing for SCR? There's a new PAC dedicated
to it (it's also on the DU home page):

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stempac/

Be forewarned--there is much praising fo Bill Frist occurring now, but those of us who have been pushing SCR are willing to take any help we can get!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Around 40% of all blastocysts don't make it to the embryo stage
Without intervention from humans in any way. The woman doesn't even know it's there.

Also take into account fertility clinics. They create far more blastocysts than they need. What do they do with the ones they don't need?

There's a reason fertility clinics require more than one fertilized egg and multiple tries to get a live baby nine months later. The body rejects far more than it accepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Very true.
And to make matter worse, most of the blastocysts in deep freeze right now are NOT high quality blastocysts. That's because if the parents have already had one or two or three or four transferred, they definitely had the highest quality blastocysts transferred (they are graded according to quality).

My friends still have three blastocysts in cold storage. Two are medium to low quality and one is very low quality. Chances are, even if they were donated to a surrogate (my friends have infant twins now from the two highest quality blastocysts and don't want any more), those blastocysts wouldn't make it because of their low quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. ist isnt a baby it is a cyst.. get used to it..!! that pig wont ever fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. I was amazed that Bill Frist used that very word yesterday.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
20.  BLASTOCYST STEM CELL RESEARCH..atten congresscritters
SAY:.........BLASTOCYST STEM CELL RESEARCH.

on all media and print material they put out........the members of congress should use this term.......the talking heads..should use this term.

remember language means a whole lot to this bunch ..they always turn it around and parse words.


gingrich taught them (http://www.politicalstrategy.org/archives/000013.php......)



lets turn the tables...thisi is a winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, please.
While a blastocyst IS a stage within the entire range of embryonic development, it's far more accurate to call the eight-celled mass of balls that are frozen "blastocysts" than "embryos." One is just far mroe specific and accurate than the other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hey, life is not a malfunction, they are alive
Anybody looking to blast those cysts is going to have to go through me first. Life is precious and needs to be nurtured and protected until it reaches the age of 18 when it can be sacrificed on the altars of cheap oil and/or cheap labor.
Blasting cysts is violence against life, and - Huh. This isn't the lounge and I should not make jokes about blasting cysts.
Never mind.

Blastocyst or embryo it is still a simple triage - throw them away, store them frozen indefinitely, or use them for medical research. Some of them might be implanted, but there is no shortage of embryos to be implanted, and we can always make more. There are also plenty of five year olds more in need of help and protection to waste time worrying about manufactured embryos. Don't we make these or at least assemble them? Realistically, eggs and sperm with almost as much potential to become human life go down the drain all the time. Oh, the horror, the horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. I just read a wonderful article in the Chronicle of Higher Education
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 07:31 PM by lawladyprof
sorry can't remember the date or title--but the author made the argument that we need to consider how we define human life at the end of life because that is relevant to beginning of life issues. He contended that we consider death to have occurred (and this is pretty much true in all countries) when the individual is brain dead. The blastocyst has no brain nor a functioning nervous system. This level of functioning (different from Terry Schivo (spelling?) in an end-of-life person would not provoke any disagreement about preserving "life." The author said we need to rely more on the science underlying and the ethics of neurology (neuro-ethics?) to help us with beginning-of-life issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC